Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density
Evaluation of Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density. (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial- Split Mouth Design)
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The preparation of the implant site has a major influence on the success rate and long-term survival of dental implants. Piezoelectric devices and special implant drilling inserts are now emerging to replace conventional drills.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2022
CompletedAugust 23, 2022
August 1, 2022
7 months
August 17, 2022
August 20, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Time of surgery
Average surgical times for implant site was estimated
through operation completion
Change in implant stability
ISQ was measured using ostell device
at baseline and 4 months
Change in bone density
Mean bone density using CBCT
at baseline and 4 months
Study Arms (2)
Study
EXPERIMENTALControl
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Sequential osteotomy drilling was done using mectron piezosurgery implant drilling protocol
bone osteotomy for implant placement was done following the BEGO Semados RS/RSX TrayPlus conventional drilling
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with bilateral missing premolars
- Remaining bone height more ≥ 10mm.
- Remaining bone width ≥ 6mm
You may not qualify if:
- patients that smoke more than 10 cigarettes/day
- Patients with uncontrolled systemic disease.
- Presence of bone pathology within the future osteotomy site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beirut Arab University
Beirut, 11-5020, Lebanon
Related Publications (1)
Arakji H, Osman E, Aboelsaad N, Shokry M. Evaluation of implant site preparation with piezosurgery versus conventional drills in terms of operation time, implant stability and bone density (randomized controlled clinical trial- split mouth design). BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 3;22(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02613-4.
PMID: 36463145DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer of DPH and Clinical statistician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2022
First Posted
August 23, 2022
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08