Down Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) vs Standard Sizing Strategy TAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0)
TAILOR-TAVR
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement For Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis (Type 0) Using Down Sizing Strategy Compared With Standard Sizing Strategy (HANGZHOU Solution): A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
206
1 country
15
Brief Summary
To compare down sizing strategy versus annular sizing strategy technique (control group) in Type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with self-expanding valves (SEVs): a randomized superiority trial
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2030
October 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
4.1 years
June 28, 2022
September 29, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite endpoint of Clinical Event Rate of Device Success (VARC-3), Free of pacemaker implantation, and Free of new onset complete left bundle branch block at 1 month
Composite endpoint of Device Success (VARC-3), Free of pacemaker implantation, and Free of new onset complete left bundle branch block at 1 month
1 month after index procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
New onset complete left bundle branch block
1 month after index procedure
Permanent pacemaker implantation
1 month after index procedure
Device success Rate
1 month after index procedure
More than (≥) moderate regurgitation
1 month after index procedure
Study Arms (2)
TAVR with down sizing strategy
EXPERIMENTALBalloon sizing will be used during procedural. Pre-dilation with balloon size just below the annular size. 20mm for annular size of 20-23mm. 23mm for annular size 23-26mm. Waist sign with less than mild contrast regurgitation: Evolut PRO Valve one size smaller than manufacturer recommendation and Target implant depth 0-3mm. No waist sign and/or contrast regurgitation or unable to finish supra-annular sizing: Evolut PRO annular sizing (per manufacturer recommendation) with implant depth 0-3mm.
TAVR with standard sizing strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPre-dilation with balloon size just below the annular size. 20mm for annular size of 20-23mm. 23mm for annular size 23-26mm. The prosthesis size of Evolut PRO will be chosen based on manufacturer recommendation. The target implant depth will be 0-3mm.
Interventions
Down sizing strategy in Type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding valves
Traditional sizing strategy in Type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expanding valves
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 65 years;
- Age \<65 years and age ≥ 60 years with high surgical risk after combing STS Risk Estimate (≥ 8%), Katz activities of Daily Living, major Organ System Dysfunction and Procedure-Specific Impediment;
- Severe, bicuspid aortic stenosis: Mean gradient ≥40 mmHg OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec OR Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2); if SVi \<35mL/m2, low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography is required;
- NYHA classification ≥ II;
- Type 0 (Sievers classification) by MDCT;
- Perimeter-derived annulus diameter ranges from 20.0 mm to 26.0 mm;
- Candidate for Transfemoral TAVR;
- The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee (EC) of the respective clinical site.
You may not qualify if:
- Any contra-indication for Self-expanding bioprosthetic aortic valve deployment Leukopenia (WBC \< 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb \< 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Plt\< 50,000 cell/mL).
- Active sepsis, including active bacterial endocarditis with or without treatment;
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before the intended treatment \[(defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)\].
- Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months (90 days) of the procedure.
- Estimated life expectancy \< 12 months (365 days) due to carcinomas, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease or chronic end stage pulmonary disease.
- Any Emergent surgery required before TAVR procedure.
- A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following that cannot be adequately medicated:aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin; clopidogrel; Nitinol (titanium or nickel); contrast media
- Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation.
- Subject refuses a blood transfusion.
- Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits).
- Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams.
- Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries).
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM with myocardium more than 1.5cm without an identifiable cause) with obstruction (HOCM).
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Severe mitral stenosis amenable to surgical replacement or repair.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
Fujian Provincial Hospital, Affiliated to Fuzhou University
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, China
Lanzhou University First Hospital
Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China
SUN YAT-SEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL SUN YAT-SEN University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Yulin First People's Hospital
Yulin, Guangxi, 537000, China
Zhengzhou Seventh People's Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450016, China
The Second XIANGYA Hospital Of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Jiaotong University
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
Qingdao Municipal Hospital
Qingdao, Shandong, 266000, China
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region People's Hospital
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006, China
Ning Bo First Hospital
Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315010, China
Related Publications (1)
Guo Y, Liu X, Li R, Ng S, Liu Q, Wang L, Hu P, Ren K, Jiang J, Fan J, He Y, Zhu Q, Lin X, Li H, Wang J. Comparison of downsizing strategy (HANGZHOU Solution) and standard annulus sizing strategy in type 0 bicuspid aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2024 Aug;274:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.011. Epub 2024 May 1.
PMID: 38701961DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jian' an Wang, PhD, MD
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and Outcomes Assessors all remain unaware of the intervention assignments throughout the trial.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2022
First Posted
August 23, 2022
Study Start
June 27, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2030
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
undecided