Evaluating a New Sensor That Measures the Health of the Retina in Normally-sighted Subjects
Evaluation of an Electroretinogram Sensor
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
90
1 country
2
Study Start
March 1, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 31, 2026
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
December 31, 2026
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of a new contact lens electrode to record a measurable electroretinogram (ERG). ERG sensors in various forms have been in common clinical use for more than 50 years. The ERG sensor that is the subject of this study is the RM Electrode, developed by RetMap, Inc. (project sponsor). The RM Electrode is not yet approved by the FDA. The RM Electrode will be compared to other commercially available electrode The first Aim of the present study is to compare the functionality of the RM Electrode and other commercially available electrodes. Following standard ERG test protocols, responses will be recorded from ten healthy (normally-sighted) adult subjects using both electrodes (used in random order). The signal quality of the ERG responses obtained from both contact lens electrodes will be compared. Signal quality will be determined by measuring ERG signal amplitudes and calculating signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Signal-to-noise ratios will be used to establish substantial equivalence. ERG test results will not be used to determine the effect of the devices on the participants. The second Aim of the present study is to evaluate the risk of ocular irritation caused by use of the RM Electrode compared to other commercially available electrodes. A typical ERG test session lasts 20 minutes. Ten healthy (normally-sighted) adult subjects will wear the RM Electrode on one eye and a commercially available electrode on the other eye, for a total of 60 minutes, in 20-minute sessions with short breaks in between. To determine the effect of the devices on the participants, the eyes will be evaluated for irritation.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 31, 2026
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
July 14, 2022
Actual (reported)August 22, 2022
Actual (reported)March 1, 2023
Actual (reported)December 31, 2026
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
December 31, 2026
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Arm1: ERG signal quality, including peak amplitudes, noise levels, and signal to noise ratios.
Signals recorded from both contact lens electrode will be evaluated for a-wave and b-wave peak amplitudes, signal power, noise power and signal-to-noise ratios.
Up to 24 weeks
Arm 2: Ocular irritation using clinical grading scales
Slit-lamp examination and standard clinical grading scales for bulbar redness, limbal redness, tarsal redness, and corneal staining (fluorescein).
Up to 24 weeks
Electroretinogram Signal Quality: This Arm will participate in a comparative study using two ERG sensors, one commercially available electrode and one seeking FDA approval (RM Electrode). This will be done by performing standard ERG test protocols with both electrodes worn one at a time, in one eye (random order) in ten healthy (normally-sighted) adult subjects.
Ocular Irritation: Ten healthy (normally-sighted) adult subjects will wear the RM Electrode in one eye and a commercially available electrode in the other eye for a total of 60 minutes, in 20-minute sessions with short breaks in between. The eyes will be evaluated for irritation (standard clinical grading scales for bulbar redness, limbal redness, tarsal redness, and slit-lamp examination of corneal staining) after each 20-minute interval.
The RM Electrode is a corneal ERG electrode. The distinguishing features of the RM electrode are that it is a soft contact lens with a recessed electrode (i.e. no metal electrode makes direct contact with the eye). The RM Electrode also has an integral speculum to hold the wearer's eye lids open. The electrode is designed for superior positional stability on the eye during testing. These features work together to improve ERG signal quality.
UIC Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Illinois College of Optometry
Chicago, Illinois, 60616, United States
McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;130(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10633-014-9473-7. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
Hoffmann MB, Bach M, Kondo M, Li S, Walker S, Holopigian K, Viswanathan S, Robson AG. ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2021 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;142(1):5-16. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09812-w. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
Robert Hyde, MD/PhD
UIC Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences
Michael Chaglasian, OD
Illinois College of Optometry
First Submitted
July 14, 2022
First Posted
August 22, 2022
The ERG Jet electrode is an FDA approved, commercially available corneal ERG electrode.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Study Start
March 1, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 31, 2026
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Study Completion
December 31, 2026
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Last Updated
August 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: