Indocyanine Green for Perfusion Assessment of DIEP Flaps
FAFI
1 other identifier
interventional
280
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Currently during DIEP flap reconstruction, the perfusion of the flap is assessed by the clinical view of the surgeon. Identification of demarcated ischemic zones of the DIEP flap could be optimized by using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in order to lower the rate of fat necrosis. This study evaluates whether intraoperative perfusion assessment with ICG fluorescence imaging causes a lower rate of fat necrosis compared to conventional intraoperative clinical evaluation of DIEP flaps.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2019
Longer than P75 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 19, 2022
August 1, 2022
6.3 years
August 17, 2022
August 17, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical relevant fat necrosis
Clinically relevant fat necrosis is defined as a palpable mass, either painful or not, and with or without aesthetic complaints, and developed within three months after surgery. The following grading system according to Lie et al. is used. Only grade III till IV is classified as clinical relevant fat necrosis. III: Major compromised reconstructive outcome, flap involvement:15-50%, clinical findings: Major contour defects (multiple), surgical management: Debridement/secondary procedure IV: Subtotal poor reconstructive outcome, flap involvement: \>50%, clinical findings: Skin defects, inadequate volume, volume loss, surgical management: Second local flap/ re-intervention initial flap
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Quantify perfusion of flaps
3 months
Registration of re-interventions
3 months
Registration of postoperative complications
3 months
Duration of surgery in minutes
1 day
Percentage extra resected tissue
1 day
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Interventional study arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgery will be performed according to local protocol. Flap viability during adequate hemodynamic conditions is evaluated a standard of care. Then after anastomosis of the flap but before the inset, the second intervention is performed. Intervention: evaluation of the perfusion of the skin and fat with fluorescence imaging using ICG. The flap is marked according to the fluorescence imaging evaluation, and parts without perfusion are resected. The remaining flap is inset to the remaining breast skin.
Control arm
NO INTERVENTIONSurgery will be performed according to local protocol.Flap viability during adequate hemodynamic conditions is evaluated as standard of care. Then after anastomosis of the flap but before the inset, the surgeon will leave the room, the researcher will make a recording of the flap and this will have no consequences for the procedure.
Interventions
Imaging with ICG near-infrared fluorescence is performed besides clinical judgement of the DIEP flap for perfusion evaluation. Based on fluorescence imaging, additional malperfused area(s) are resected.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients 18 years of age and older
- Who underwent a mastectomy for breast cancer or prophylactic due to genetic predisposition
- Patients scheduled for elective surgery for autologous breast reconstruction, uni- or bilateral, using DIEP or msTRAM flaps. In case of bilateral breast reconstruction the flaps should be bilateral anastomosed.
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to ICG, iodine or shellfish
- Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigators could potentially jeopardize the safety of the patient
- Impaired renal function defined as eGFR\< 50 mL/min/1.73m2 (this can be seen in the standard preoperative lab results)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2333ZA, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3015GD, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Tange FP, Verduijn PS, Sibinga Mulder BG, van Capelle L, Koning S, Driessen C, Mureau MAM, Vahrmeijer AL, van der Vorst JR. Near-infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for perfusion assessment of DIEP and msTRAM flaps: A Dutch multicenter randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 2;33:101128. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101128. eCollection 2023 Jun.
PMID: 37091505DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participant is blinded for the study arm. A second evaluator of postinterventional fat necrosis is blinded for the study arm.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Oncologic Surgeon - Hepatobiliary and Colorectal
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2022
First Posted
August 19, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2019
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 19, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share