NCT05503758

Brief Summary

Cesarean delivery (CD) is an obstetric surgery for fetal delivery that involves both an abdominal incision (laparotomy) and a uterine incision (hysterotomy). It is presently the most prevalent surgery in the United States, with over 1 million women giving birth by cesarean section each year.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 28, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 29, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 29, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 13, 2022

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 17, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 2, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

August 13, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 28, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Lumbar paravertebral muscle frequency (tone)

    Tone is a contractile property of a muscle which describes the resting muscle's resistance to passive and active stretch forces

    Assessment will be done 6-12 weeks after the use of anaesthesia for Cesarean section by the MyotonPRO device

  • Lumbar paravertebral muscle stiffness

    Stiffness is a biomechanical property of a muscle and its connective tissue which refers to the tissue's resistance toward the deformation of external load

    Assessment will be done 6-12 weeks after the use of anaesthesia for Cesarean section by the MyotonPRO device

Study Arms (4)

Group A

9 participants have exposed to midline epidural anaesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Device: Myoton PRO device (MyotonPRO; Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia)

Group B

22 participants have exposed to midline spinal anaesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Device: Myoton PRO device (MyotonPRO; Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia)

Group C

10 participants underwent general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Device: Myoton PRO device (MyotonPRO; Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia)

Group D

22 participants were in the control group (no previous pregnancy or anaesthesia).

Device: Myoton PRO device (MyotonPRO; Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia)

Interventions

The MyotoPRO device is a portable objective device for measuring the contractile (tone), and biomechanical (stiffness) properties of lumbar paravertebral muscles (LPVMs).

Also known as: Myotonometry
Group AGroup BGroup CGroup D

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsBecause this study is presented to the department of Physical Therapy for Women's Health to observe the changes after cesarean delivery and its relevant anaesthesia.
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Sixty-three women participated in this study and were recruited from South Valley University Teaching Hospitals, in Qena governorate, Egypt.

You may qualify if:

  • All women gave birth through a cesarean delivery.
  • All women either primiparous or multiparous have not had anaesthesia (epidural, spinal, or general) for at least one year prior to the last obstetric anaesthesia.
  • Their ages ranged from 18 to 35 years.
  • All participants had a body mass index (BMI) of not more than 30, and a waist-to-hip ratio of not more than 1.
  • Participants were assessed between the 6th week to the 12th week postnatal.
  • All participants were able to continue all assessment procedures.
  • They were medically stable.

You may not qualify if:

  • Women who delivered through vaginal delivery.
  • Women who delivered through cesarean delivery, but the used anaesthetic technique was the paramedian approach for either the epidural or spinal anaesthesia.
  • Women with urinary tract infections.
  • Women who were below 18 years old or above 35 years old.
  • Women who had a (BMI) above 30 or a waist-to-hip ratio above 1.
  • Women who did not continue all assessment procedures.
  • Women who had any specific low back pain as women who were diagnosed with lumbar disc prolapse, scoliosis, or spondylolisthesis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of physical therapy, South Valley University

Qina, Qena Governorate, 83523, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Iddrisu M, Khan ZH. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery: general or regional anesthesia-a systematic review. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021 Dec;13(1):1-7.

    BACKGROUND
  • Mhyre JM, Sultan P. General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Occasionally Essential but Best Avoided. Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):864-866. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002708. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30985305BACKGROUND
  • Lenhardt R. Body temperature regulation and anesthesia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;157:635-644. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64074-1.00037-9.

    PMID: 30459029BACKGROUND
  • Struzik A, Karamanidis K, Lorimer A, Keogh JWL, Gajewski J. Application of Leg, Vertical, and Joint Stiffness in Running Performance: A Literature Overview. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021 Oct 21;2021:9914278. doi: 10.1155/2021/9914278. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34721664BACKGROUND
  • Van Deun B, Hobbelen JSM, Cagnie B, Van Eetvelde B, Van Den Noortgate N, Cambier D. Reproducible Measurements of Muscle Characteristics Using the MyotonPRO Device: Comparison Between Individuals With and Without Paratonia. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018 Oct/Dec;41(4):194-203. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000119.

    PMID: 28005829BACKGROUND
  • Sung, S., and Mahdy, H. (2021):

    BACKGROUND
  • Hodges PW, Danneels L. Changes in Structure and Function of the Back Muscles in Low Back Pain: Different Time Points, Observations, and Mechanisms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Jun;49(6):464-476. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8827.

    PMID: 31151377BACKGROUND
  • Hamilton RI, Garden CLP, Brown SJ. Immediate effect of a spinal mobilisation intervention on muscle stiffness, tone and elasticity in subjects with lower back pain - A randomized cross-over trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Jan;29:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Oct 9.

    PMID: 35248290BACKGROUND
  • Lo WLA, Yu Q, Mao Y, Li W, Hu C, Li L. Lumbar muscles biomechanical characteristics in young people with chronic spinal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 23;20(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2935-z.

    PMID: 31759390BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Lecturer of Physical Therapy for Women's Health

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2022

First Posted

August 17, 2022

Study Start

June 28, 2021

Primary Completion

January 29, 2022

Study Completion

January 29, 2022

Last Updated

October 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations