M-Tapa Block vs External Oblique Intercostal Block for Laparoscopic Cholesistectomy
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided M-TAPA Block and External Oblique Intercostal Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ultrasound (US)-guided Modified Perichondral Approach Thoracoabdominal Nerve (M-TAPA) block is a novel block that provides effective analgesia in the anterior and lateral abdominal walls after laparoscopic surgery, and local anesthetic is applied only to the lower side of the perichondral surface. M-TAPA block is a good alternative for analgesia of the upper dermatome levels and the abdominal lateral wall and may be an opioid-sparing strategy with good quality recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. US-guided External oblique intercostal block (EOB) is a block performed by injection of local anesthetic between the external and internal oblique muscles. This block provides abdominal analgesia between T6-T10 levels. There are studies in the literature showing that it provides effective analgesia. However, there is no study comparing M-TAPA and EOB yet. In this study, our aim is to compare the effectiveness of US-guided M-TAPA block and EOB for postoperative analgesia management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Our primary aim is to compare patient recovery scores (QoR15 Turkish version), our secondary aim is to compare postoperative pain scores (24-hour NRS), postoperative rescue analgesic use (opioid), and opioid-related side effects (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2023
CompletedJune 27, 2023
June 1, 2023
9 months
August 10, 2022
June 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Global recovery scoring system (patient satisfaction scale)
We will use the Turkish version of Quality of Recovery / QoR-15 questionairre
Change from baseline score at postoperative 24 hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Postoperative pain scores (Numerical rating scale) (0-meaning "no pain" to 10-meaning "worst pain imaginable")
Postoperative 24 hours period (0, 2, 4, 8, 16 ve 24 h)
The use of rescue analgesia
Postoperative 24 hours period
Study Arms (2)
Group M-TAPA = M-TAPA group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by a pain nurse blinded to the procedure. 0,5 mg/kg meperidin will be performed for rescue analgesia.
Group EOB = EOB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by a pain nurse blinded to the procedure. 0,5 mg/kg meperidin will be performed for rescue analgesia.
Interventions
Under aseptic conditions, a high-frequency linear probe will be placed on the costochondral angle in the sagittal plane. Then the probe will be slightly angled deeply to visualize the lower view of the perichondrium. We will perform M-TAPA with total of 40 ml (20 ml for each side) of %0,25 bupivacaine.
In the supine position, a high-frequency linear US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be covered with a sterile sheath, and an 80 mm block needle (Braun 360°) will be used. The US probe will be placed on the midaxillary line between the spina iliaca anterior superior and the umbilicus. Using the In-Plane technique, 5 ml of saline will be injected under the external oblique muscle of the block needle and the block location will be confirmed. After the block location is confirmed, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered. The same procedure will be applied to the other side (40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in total).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Scheduled for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Bleeding diathesis
- anticoagulant treatment
- local anesthetics and opioid allergy
- Infection at the site of block
- Patients who do not accept the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Tulgar S, Senturk O, Selvi O, Balaban O, Ahiskalioglu A, Thomas DT, Ozer Z. Perichondral approach for blockage of thoracoabdominal nerves: Anatomical basis and clinical experience in three cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Oct 31. No abstract available.
PMID: 30388604BACKGROUNDAltiparmak B, Toker MK, Uysal AI, Turan M, Demirbilek SG. Reply to Tulgar et al.: Perichondral approach for blockage of thoracoabdominal nerves: Anatomical basis and clinical experience in three cases. J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:150-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 30553219BACKGROUNDTulgar S, Selvi O, Thomas DT, Deveci U, Ozer Z. Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) provides effective analgesia in abdominal surgery and is a choice for opioid sparing anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:109. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 9. No abstract available.
PMID: 30639940BACKGROUNDElsharkawy H, Kolli S, Soliman LM, Seif J, Drake RL, Mariano ER, El-Boghdadly K. The External Oblique Intercostal Block: Anatomic Evaluation and Case Series. Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2436-2442. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab296.
PMID: 34626112BACKGROUNDHamilton DL, Manickam BP, Wilson MAJ, Abdel Meguid E. External oblique fascial plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan 11:rapm-2018-100256. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100256. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.
PMID: 30635518BACKGROUNDTulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, Selvi O, Thomas DT, Ozer Z. Similarities between external oblique fascial plane block and blockage of thoracoabdominal nerves through perichondral approach (TAPA). J Clin Anesth. 2019 Nov;57:91-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.03.027. Epub 2019 Mar 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 30933854BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcomes Assessor and participant were blinded to the study
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2022
First Posted
August 16, 2022
Study Start
August 23, 2022
Primary Completion
May 30, 2023
Study Completion
May 30, 2023
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared