Contribution of Online Stress and Pain Mindfulness Treatment to ACT Process Change and Outcomes in Chronic Pain
Differential Contributions of Online Stress and Pain-explicit Mindfulness Treatment Groups to Processes, Patient Experience and Outcomes in Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Analysis
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mindfulness is a popular set of knowledge and practical techniques that can help people cope with stress. It includes meditation practices, everyday small practices to break and change usual habits, as well as understanding and developing competencies to be more aware of thoughts, emotions and physical sensations. Mindfulness can help not to excessively react to them, or becoming distressed by these, as well as pain. In persistent pain (pain that lasts more than three months), mindfulness is thought to improve depression, quality of life, and even how sore people feel. There are numerous versions of mindfulness and mindfulness-based therapies. One approach, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), is based on science (as opposed to religion or common sense). ACT helps people to learn about and apply skills to cope with thoughts, emotions and sensations without getting upset, distracted or impeded by them. It also assists people to develop the ability to set clear goals that matter in their life. ACT evaluates successful outcomes in this areas (called 'processes') and how these link to changes in pain, mood and stress. However, more puritan mindfulness courses tend to only focus on the latter. Research on mindfulness courses for chronic pain, can show that people improve, but not so well what changes in people's experience and skills, or how such skills are applied. The investigators also know that pain sufferers who attend mindfulness courses for stress, may say it is not so relevant to their pain difficulties. In this study the investigators want to explore how both mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses, online, contribute to:
- How specific areas of ACT and other mindfulness learning change
- If/how these link with practical skills and any emotional or improvements in the participants' quality of life, use of medication or GP visits.
- If/how the above correlate with physiological stress responses such a heart rate variability To help us evaluate this, the investigators will ask participants to complete scientifically accepted questionnaires and interview a proportion of participants. Some may be invited to wear portable heart rate monitors. The investigators will then use statistical methods and qualitative methods to evaluate change. This may help us with better supporting chronic pain sufferers with choices around mindfulness as a standalone or as part of attending intensive pain-coping programmes involving different professions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started Dec 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedJune 6, 2023
June 1, 2023
5 months
July 21, 2022
June 5, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Differential contribution of mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) process 1: Acceptance utilising The 7-item Acceptance and Action Questionnaire v.2
This will be utilised to measure and track the patient's change (if any) - at relevant time points in the study - in willingness to experience general unpleasant feelings and emotions that are not pain related (not to unfairly disadvantage the stress version of the course). Assessed by Likert scale on multiple itemts (1 = Never True ; 7 = Always true)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
Differential contribution of mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) process 1a: Pain Acceptance utilisikng the 8-item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire
This will be utilised to measure and track the patient's changes (if any) - at relevant at each time point in the study - with acceptance of pain. Assessed by Likert Scale on multiple items (0 = Never true; 6 = always true).
baseline, pre-intervention, during intervention, immediately after intervention, 3 months after the intervention
Differential contribution of mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) process 2: Contact with the Present Moment: The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale will be utilised.
This will be utilised to track and measure the patient's changes (if any) - at each time point in the study - of mindful attention and awareness. Assessed by Liker Scale on multiple items (1 = Almost Always; 6 = Almost Never)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
Differential contribution of mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) process 3: Self in context: The Self Experience Questionnaire will be utlised.
This measure will be utilised to track and measure the changes (if any) - at each time point in the study - of patient's ability to observe themselves as separate from triggering processes. Assessed by Likert Scale on multiple items (0 = never true; 6 = always true)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
Differential contribution of mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) process 4: Cognitive fusion: the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire
This will be utilised to measure and track the patient's changes (if any) - at each time point in the study - with how entangled they are with thinking.Assessed by Likert Scale on multiple items (1 = Never True; 7 = always true)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
Differential contribution of mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) process 5: Values: The Chronic Pain Values Inventory
This will be utilised to measure and track the patient's changes (if any) - at each time point in the study - with how able they are to notice what matters in their life and their discrepancy with / from it. Assessed via Likert scale on importance/success 0 - 5 (0 = not at all important/successful; 5 = extremely important/successful)
baseline, pre-intervention, during intervention, immediately after intervention, 3 months after the intervention
Differential contribution of mindfulness for stress and mindfulness for pain courses on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) process 6: Committed Action: The 8-item Committed Action Questionnaire
This will be utilised to measure and track the patient's changes (if any) - at each time point in the study - their ability to commit to valuable behaviours. Assessed by likert scale on multiple items (0 = Never True; 6 = always true)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (8)
IMMPACT consistent, changes in Pain Intensity (How sore the participant is) will be evaluated utilising the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way, week 4 of 8); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
IMMPACT consistent, changes in Pain Interference (on functioning and aspects of quality of life) will be evaluated utilising the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way, week 4 of 8); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
IMMPACT consistent measurement of change in emotional functioning: depression screening utilizing the Beck Depression Inventory - Fast Screen (BDI-FS)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way, week 4 of 8); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
IMMPACT consistent measurement of change in emotional functioning: catastrophizing, utilizing Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way, week 4 of 8); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
IMMPACT consistent measurement of change in patient's ratings of global functioning
baseline at recruitment; baseline, pre-intervention; during intervention (half-way, week 4 of 8); immediately after intervention; 3 months after the intervention
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Breathworks Mindfulness for Health
ACTIVE COMPARATORan 8-week, online, protocol based mindfulness course designed to manage chronic pain and chronic health conditions
Breathworks Mindfulness for Stress
ACTIVE COMPARATORan 8-week, online, protocol based mindfulness course designed to manage stress
Waiting list
NO INTERVENTIONThe Waiting list will be for the whole sample of participants (acting as a waiting list control). From this, participants will be randomly allocated to one of the Arms above
Interventions
As for previous descriptions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of Chronic Pain: Pain for longer than 3 months
- Ability to communicate and literacy in English
- Age 18 years or older
- No current outstanding medical tests or procedures for conditions expected by the GP to interfere with participation in treatment.
- Has not previously received non-medical treatment at a specialist pain centre, or attended a multidisciplinary pain management programme.
- Ability to utilise online video conferencing technology (i.e. ownership of a compatible device \& necessary technical competence)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are actively suicidal
- terminally ill or have
- Dementia
- cognitive impairment
- learning difficulties, or
- the primary care physician knows of another reason to exclude.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Government of Jerseylead
- Liverpool John Moores Universitycollaborator
- Breathworks CICcollaborator
- Primary Care Body (Jersey, United Kingdom)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Pain Clinic
Saint Helier, JE1 3UH, Jersey
Related Publications (50)
Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504.
PMID: 16443717BACKGROUNDBawa FL, Mercer SW, Atherton RJ, Clague F, Keen A, Scott NW, Bond CM. Does mindfulness improve outcomes in patients with chronic pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jun;65(635):e387-400. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685297.
PMID: 26009534BACKGROUNDBond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.
PMID: 22035996BACKGROUNDAbdulla A, Adams N, Bone M, Elliott AM, Gaffin J, Jones D, Knaggs R, Martin D, Sampson L, Schofield P; British Geriatric Society. Guidance on the management of pain in older people. Age Ageing. 2013 Mar;42 Suppl 1:i1-57. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs200.
PMID: 23420266BACKGROUNDBraun V. and Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in Psychology; 3(2):77-101.
BACKGROUNDBrown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
PMID: 12703651BACKGROUNDBurch, V. (2008). Living Well with Pain and Illness: Piatkus.
BACKGROUNDBurch, V., & Penman, D. (2013). Mindfulness for Health: A practical guide to relieving pain, reducing stress and restoring wellbeing: Little, Brown Book Group.
BACKGROUNDDay, M. A. (2017). Overview of the eight-session treatment. In Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Clinical Manual and Guide, (pp. 89-113): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
BACKGROUNDDay MA, Jensen MP, Ehde DM, Thorn BE. Toward a theoretical model for mindfulness-based pain management. J Pain. 2014 Jul;15(7):691-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.03.003.
PMID: 24985483BACKGROUNDDworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012. No abstract available.
PMID: 15621359BACKGROUNDFeliu-Soler A, Montesinos F, Gutierrez-Martinez O, Scott W, McCracken LM, Luciano JV. Current status of acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a narrative review. J Pain Res. 2018 Oct 2;11:2145-2159. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144631. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30323649BACKGROUNDGillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE, Campbell L, Kerr S, Tansey L, Noel P, Ferenbach C, Masley S, Roach L, Lloyd J, May L, Clarke S, Remington B. The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Behav Ther. 2014 Jan;45(1):83-101. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
PMID: 24411117BACKGROUNDGuyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.
PMID: 18436948BACKGROUNDGuy W. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology (DHEW Publication No. ADM 76-338). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1976.
BACKGROUNDHarrison AM, Scott W, Johns LC, Morris EMJ, McCracken LM. Are We Speaking the Same Language? Finding Theoretical Coherence and Precision in "Mindfulness-Based Mechanisms" in Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):2138-2151. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw310.
PMID: 28082525BACKGROUNDHayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG (1999): Acceptance & Commitment therapy: An Experiential Approach to Behaviour Change. New Your, Guilford Press.
BACKGROUNDHedges, L. (1981). Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107-128.
BACKGROUNDHennessy, G. (2017). The Little Mindfulness Workbook: Everyday techniques to help you combat stress and enhance your life: Crimson Publishing.
BACKGROUNDHilton L, Hempel S, Ewing BA, Apaydin E, Xenakis L, Newberry S, Colaiaco B, Maher AR, Shanman RM, Sorbero ME, Maglione MA. Mindfulness Meditation for Chronic Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2017 Apr;51(2):199-213. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9844-2.
PMID: 27658913BACKGROUNDHopper MJ, Curtis S, Hodge S, Simm R. A qualitative study exploring the effects of attending a community pain service choir on wellbeing in people who experience chronic pain. Br J Pain. 2016 Aug;10(3):124-34. doi: 10.1177/2049463716638368. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
PMID: 27583139BACKGROUNDKabat-Zinn J. An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;4(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3.
PMID: 7042457BACKGROUNDKabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 281-306. doi:10.1080/14639947.2011.564844
BACKGROUNDKabat-Zinn J. Too Early to Tell: The Potential Impact and Challenges-Ethical and Otherwise-Inherent in the Mainstreaming of Dharma in an Increasingly Dystopian World. Mindfulness (N Y). 2017;8(5):1125-1135. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0758-2. Epub 2017 Jun 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 28989546BACKGROUNDMBSR Course Outline. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.umassmed.edu/cfm/mindfulness-based-programs/mbsr-courses/mbsr/mbsr-course-outline/
BACKGROUNDMBTT. (2011). Good Practice Guidelines for Teaching Mindfulness Based Courses. In: UK Network for Mindfulness Based Teachers.
BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Sato A, Taylor GJ. A trial of a brief group-based form of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for chronic pain in general practice: pilot outcome and process results. J Pain. 2013 Nov;14(11):1398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
PMID: 24035351BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Vowles KE. Acceptance and commitment therapy and mindfulness for chronic pain: model, process, and progress. Am Psychol. 2014 Feb-Mar;69(2):178-87. doi: 10.1037/a0035623.
PMID: 24547803BACKGROUNDMorse, J. M. (2000). Determining Sample Size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3-5.
BACKGROUNDNicholas MK. Self-efficacy and chronic pain. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society, St. Andrews, Scotland; 1989.
BACKGROUNDPoole H, Bramwell R, Murphy P. The utility of the Beck Depression Inventory Fast Screen (BDI-FS) in a pain clinic population. Eur J Pain. 2009 Sep;13(8):865-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.09.017. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
PMID: 19010075BACKGROUNDRoland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004. No abstract available.
PMID: 6222486BACKGROUNDSantorelli, S., F. (2014). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR): Standards of Practice. In. Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachussets Medical School: The Centre for Mindfulness, Medicine, Health Care and Society.
BACKGROUNDScott W, McCracken LM, Norton S. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Facets of Psychological Flexibility in a Sample of People Seeking Treatment for Chronic Pain. Ann Behav Med. 2016 Apr;50(2):285-96. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9752-x.
PMID: 26608280BACKGROUNDSegal, Z., V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J., D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
BACKGROUNDShapiro SL, Carlson LE, Astin JA, Freedman B. Mechanisms of mindfulness. J Clin Psychol. 2006 Mar;62(3):373-86. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20237.
PMID: 16385481BACKGROUNDSullivan, M.J.L., Bishop, S. and Pivik, J. (1995) The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and Validation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 524-532.
BACKGROUNDTan G, Jensen MP, Thornby JI, Shanti BF. Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain. 2004 Mar;5(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005.
PMID: 15042521BACKGROUNDVan Dam NT, van Vugt MK, Vago DR, Schmalzl L, Saron CD, Olendzki A, Meissner T, Lazar SW, Kerr CE, Gorchov J, Fox KCR, Field BA, Britton WB, Brefczynski-Lewis JA, Meyer DE. Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan;13(1):36-61. doi: 10.1177/1745691617709589. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
PMID: 29016274BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
PMID: 1593914BACKGROUNDYu, L., McCracken, L. M., & Norton, S. (2016). The Self Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ): Preliminary analyses for a measure of self in people with chronic pain. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(3), 127-133. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.07.006
BACKGROUNDKabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. Rev. and updated edition, Bantam Books trade paperback edition. New York: Bantam Books.
BACKGROUNDBPS (2013) Guidelines for pain management programmes for adults. British Pain Society. https://www.britishpainsociety.org [Free Full-text]
BACKGROUNDDobkin PL. Mindfulness-based stress reduction: what processes are at work? Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2008 Feb;14(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
PMID: 18243937BACKGROUNDWilliams L. Mindfulness on pain management programmes - are we teaching it as well as we could? Pain News.2019; 17(1) 31-32
BACKGROUNDFish RA, McGuire B, Hogan M, Morrison TG, Stewart I. Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8. Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):435-443. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.016. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PMID: 20188472BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Yang SY. The role of values in a contextual cognitive-behavioral approach to chronic pain. Pain. 2006 Jul;123(1-2):137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.021. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
PMID: 16564627BACKGROUNDYu L, Scott W, Goodman R, Driscoll L, McCracken LM. Measuring 'self': preliminary validation of a short form of the Self Experiences Questionnaire in people with chronic pain. Br J Pain. 2021 Nov;15(4):474-485. doi: 10.1177/2049463721994863. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
PMID: 34840795BACKGROUNDMcCracken LM, Chilcot J, Norton S. Further development in the assessment of psychological flexibility: a shortened Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8). Eur J Pain. 2015 May;19(5):677-85. doi: 10.1002/ejp.589. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
PMID: 25181605BACKGROUNDSullivan, M. J. L., S. R. Bishop and J. Pivik (1995).
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alessio Agostinis
Government of Jersey
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The data analysis will be performed blind by one of the researchers - after data has been anonymised and transferred.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Clinical Psychologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2022
First Posted
August 12, 2022
Study Start
December 21, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06