Effectiveness of Dry Needling in People With Episodic Tension-type Headache
1 other identifier
interventional
36
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Tension-type headache is a widespread disorder, with a lifetime prevalence in the general population ranging between 30% and 78%. Tension-type headache also places a financial burden on society and individuals. Myofascial pain can reduce the range of motion and patterns of muscle activation and play an important role in tension-type headache. Based on the previous studies, dry needling can reduce local and referred pain, increase range of motion and improve patterns of muscle activation in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with tension-type headache is not fully known. Objective: The aim of this study will be to investigate the effectiveness of dry needling on pain, active range of motion, functional disability, and frequency of headache in patients with episodic tension-type headache. Method: This study will be a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Thirty-six patients with episodic tension-type headache will be randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group (dry needling and routine physical therapy) and the control group (sham dry needling and routine physical therapy). The primary outcomes will be pain intensity and active range of motion of the craniocervical region. Functional disability and frequency of headache will be considered secondary outcomes. Outcomes will be assessed before and one week after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedFebruary 16, 2023
February 1, 2023
6 months
August 2, 2022
February 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Pain level
0-100 Numeric Pain Rating Scale will be used to evaluate changes in level of pain from the baseline to one week after the intervention. Zero indicates no pain and 100 indicates maximum pain that the patient experiences.
Change between baseline and one week after intervention.
Active craniocervical range of motion
Active craniocervical range of motion of the participants with episodic tension-type headache will be measured using a SAEHAN plastic universal two-arm goniometer with 360° goniometer face and 30-cm (11.81- in) movable arms. For measuring active flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation, the participants will be asked to sit upright on a chair with a padded backrest supporting the thoracic spine with their feet flat on the floor and arms positioned comfortably on the armrests beside them. To minimize the contribution of the thoracic spine, the participant will be securely strapped across the shoulders to the chair using an inelastic belt. All the measured angles will be documented by a third person. The movements will be measured in the following sequences: flexion, extension, left lateral flexion, right lateral flexion, left rotation, and right rotation.
Change between baseline and one week after intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Functional disability
Change between baseline and one week after intervention.
Frequency of headache:
Change between baseline and one week after intervention.
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will include 18 participants with episodic tension-type headache. The treatment will include dry needling of the suboccipital, levator scapula, upper trapezius, masseter, sternocleidomastoid, splenius capitis, and cervicis, frontalis, and temporalis muscles and routine physical therapy. The needles will be inserted to obtain local twitch response, and this process will continue until no more local twitch response occurs in each session. Then the needles will be left in place for 20 minutes. In each session, three muscles from one side will be needled. Routine physical therapy will include information on nature, management, course of episodic tension-type headaches, and Multimodal care that includes craniocervical exercises and postural correction. The treatment will last two weeks, six sessions, three times a week.
Control group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control group will include 18 participants with episodic tension-type headache. The treatment will include "sham" dry needling of the suboccipital, levator scapula, upper trapezius, masseter, sternocleidomastoid, splenius capitis, and cervicis, frontalis and temporalis muscles and routine physical therapy. The sham dry needling method includes the insertion of the needles subcutaneously and no local twitch response will be obtained. The needles will be left in the place for 20 minutes. In each session, three muscles from one side will be needled. Routine physical therapy will include information on nature, management, course of episodic tension-type headaches, and Multimodal care that includes craniocervical exercises and postural correction. The treatment will last two weeks, six sessions, three times a week.
Interventions
The method of performing the dry needling technique will be based on the methods presented by Dommerholt and Fernandez-de-Las-Penas. One length of sterile, disposable 0.30 mm x 30 mm solid filament needle (Tony, China) will be used. The length of the needle for each participant will be selected based on the size of the participant. The needles will be inserted to obtain local twitch response, and this process will continue until no more Dry needling: The method of performing the dry needling technique will be based on the methods presented by Dommerholt and Fernandez-de-Las-Penas. One length of sterile, disposable 0.30 mm x 30 mm solid filament needle (Tony, China) will be used. The length of the needle for each participant will be selected based on the size of the participant. The needles will be inserted to obtain local twitch response, and this process will continue until no more local twitch response occurs in each session. Then the needles will be left in place for 20 minutes.
The sham dry needling method includes the insertion of the needles subcutaneously and no local twitch response will be obtained. The needles will be left in the place for 20 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of CTTH based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition
- At least one active trigger point in each of the muscles of the sub occipital, sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius, temporalis, levator scapula, masseter, frontalis, and splenius cervicis and capitis
- Moderate pain intensity from 30 to 60 based on the numeric pain rating scale
You may not qualify if:
- Needle phobia
- History of surgery on head, neck, and shoulder
- pregnancy
- cancer, infectious diseases, or systemic diseases
- History of involvement with other types of primary headaches
- History of neck radiculopathy and other orthopedic neck injuries (including fractures, facet joint syndrome, etc.) in the past year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (18)
GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2.
PMID: 28919117BACKGROUNDChowdhury D. Tension type headache. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012 Aug;15(Suppl 1):S83-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.100023.
PMID: 23024570BACKGROUNDDowson A. The burden of headache: global and regional prevalence of headache and its impact. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2015 May;(182):3-7. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12650.
PMID: 25907016BACKGROUNDHeadache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. No abstract available.
PMID: 29368949BACKGROUNDFumal A, Schoenen J. Tension-type headache: current research and clinical management. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Jan;7(1):70-83. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70325-3.
PMID: 18093564BACKGROUNDBendtsen L. Central sensitization in tension-type headache--possible pathophysiological mechanisms. Cephalalgia. 2000 Jun;20(5):486-508. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00070.x.
PMID: 11037746BACKGROUNDFernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Cuadrado ML, Gerwin RD, Pareja JA. Myofascial trigger points and their relationship to headache clinical parameters in chronic tension-type headache. Headache. 2006 Sep;46(8):1264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00440.x.
PMID: 16942471BACKGROUNDKamonseki DH, Lopes EP, van der Meer HA, Calixtre LB. Effectiveness of manual therapy in patients with tension-type headache. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 May;44(10):1780-1789. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1813817. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
PMID: 32924640BACKGROUNDCagnie B, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Timmermans F, Delrue N, Meeus M. Physiologic effects of dry needling. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Aug;17(8):348. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0348-5.
PMID: 23801002BACKGROUNDGildir S, Tuzun EH, Eroglu G, Eker L. A randomized trial of trigger point dry needling versus sham needling for chronic tension-type headache. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e14520. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014520.
PMID: 30813155BACKGROUNDKamali F, Mohamadi M, Fakheri L, Mohammadnejad F. Dry needling versus friction massage to treat tension type headache: A randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jan;23(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.01.009. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PMID: 30691768BACKGROUNDMousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Montazeri A, Mehdian H, Karimi A, Abedi M, Ashtiani AA, Mobini B, Hadian MR. Translation and validation study of the Iranian versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Dec 15;32(26):E825-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815ce6dd.
PMID: 18091478BACKGROUNDCote P, Yu H, Shearer HM, Randhawa K, Wong JJ, Mior S, Ameis A, Carroll LJ, Nordin M, Varatharajan S, Sutton D, Southerst D, Jacobs C, Stupar M, Taylor-Vaisey A, Gross DP, Brison RJ, Paulden M, Ammendolia C, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Marshall S, Bohay RN, Stapleton J, Lacerte M. Non-pharmacological management of persistent headaches associated with neck pain: A clinical practice guideline from the Ontario protocol for traffic injury management (OPTIMa) collaboration. Eur J Pain. 2019 Jul;23(6):1051-1070. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1374. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
PMID: 30707486BACKGROUNDFernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Florencio LL, Plaza-Manzano G, Arias-Buria JL. Clinical Reasoning Behind Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Management of Headaches: A Narrative Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 9;17(11):4126. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114126.
PMID: 32527071BACKGROUNDvan Ettekoven H, Lucas C. Efficacy of physiotherapy including a craniocervical training programme for tension-type headache; a randomized clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2006 Aug;26(8):983-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01163.x.
PMID: 16886935BACKGROUNDMadsen BK, Sogaard K, Andersen LL, Tornoe B, Jensen RH. Efficacy of strength training on tension-type headache: A randomised controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2018 May;38(6):1071-1080. doi: 10.1177/0333102417722521. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
PMID: 28750588BACKGROUNDMadsen BK, Sogaard K, Andersen LL, Skotte J, Tornoe B, Jensen RH. Neck/shoulder function in tension-type headache patients and the effect of strength training. J Pain Res. 2018 Feb 23;11:445-454. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S146050. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29503581BACKGROUNDFarooq MN, Mohseni Bandpei MA, Ali M, Khan GA. Reliability of the universal goniometer for assessing active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic healthy persons. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Mar-Apr;32(2):457-61. doi: 10.12669/pjms.322.8747.
PMID: 27182261BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2022
First Posted
August 9, 2022
Study Start
June 30, 2023
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
February 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
The data sets of this study will be available upon a reasonable request to the corresponding author.