Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium Versus Propofol for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fospropofol disodium for injection compared to propofol for sedation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Aug 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2023
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
September 1, 2022
10 months
August 5, 2022
September 19, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of time spent reaching sedation goals
Proportion of RASS assessment time points for subjects meeting target sedation levels among all RASS assessment time points during study drug administration without rescue sedation.
Within 7 days of the study began
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Invasive ventilator free time within 7 days
Within 7 days of the study began
Rate of successful extubation within 7 days
Within 7 days of the study began
Incidence of unexpected extubation
Within 7 days of the study began
Proportion of delirium in the ICU
During ICU stay
Non-ICU survival time within 28 days
Within 28 days of the study began
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fospropofol disodium for injection
EXPERIMENTALFospropofol disodium continuous infusion to reach a RASS score of -3 to 0. Remifentanil continuous infusion of 4 to 9 ug/kg/h for analgesia.The dosage adjustment plan was determined by the attending physician. Whether to use other sedative drugs is up to the attending physician.
propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropofol continuous infusion to reach a RASS score of -3 to 0. Remifentanil continuous infusion of 4 to 9 ug/kg/h for analgesia. The dosage adjustment plan was determined by the attending physician. Whether to use other sedative drugs is up to the attending physician.
Interventions
Fospropofol disodium for injection continuous infusion to reach a RASS score of -3 to 0. Remifentanil continuous infusion of 4 to 9 ug/kg/h for. The dosage adjustment plan was determined by the attending physician. Whether to use other sedative drugs is up to the attending physician.
Propofol for injection continuous infusion to reach a RASS score of -3 to 0. Remifentanil continuous infusion of 4 to 9 ug/kg/h for. The dosage adjustment plan was determined by the attending physician. Whether to use other sedative drugs is up to the attending physician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged \>= 18 and \<= 75 years; Endotracheal intubated; Patients currently on mechanical ventilation \<= 96 hours and expected to be mechanically ventilated \>= 24 hours; Demand for light/moderate sedation (a RASS score of -3 to 0).
You may not qualify if:
- Informed Consent is unsigned; Participated in any other interventional research within 3 months; Tracheostomy; BMI \<= 18 and \>= 35 kilograms per square meter Pregnant; Lactant; Known or suspected allergy to various components of the study drug or to opioids and their salvage drugs, or other diseases (such as pancreatitis associated with hyperlipidemia) for which lipid emulsion should not be used; Patients who cannot be evaluated for RASS for various reasons (such as mental illness, acquired or congenital mental retardation, deafness, severe neuromuscular disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, cerebrovascular disease, coma, or severe cognitive impairment due to structural diseases such as stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, head injury, malignancy, hypoxic brain injury, or cerebral edema); Patients with an expected survival period of less than 48 hours; Severe hepatic insufficiency (CTP score is 10-15 points); Chronic kidney disease (CKD grade 3 above); Unstable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction; Left ventricular ejection fraction \<= 30%; Heart rate \< 50bpm(intravenous pumping of isoproterenol \<4ug/min, heart rate ≥50bpm may not be excluded); Type 2 second-degree or third-degree atrioventricular block (except those implanted a pacemaker); Two vasoconstrictors are used to maintain SBP above 90mmHg after sufficient fluid resuscitation; Myasthenia gravis; Patients with a history of drug abuse, drug abuse, alcohol abuse and long-term use of psychotropic drugs within 2 years before the screening period. Binge drinking is defined as regular drinking more than 14 times per week (1 time = 150ml of wine or 360ml of beer or 45ml of spirits);
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xiaobo Yang, MDlead
Study Sites (1)
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2022
First Posted
August 8, 2022
Study Start
August 10, 2022
Primary Completion
June 15, 2023
Study Completion
September 10, 2023
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-09