Cutaneous Acceptability, Comedogenic Potential and Efficacy of Two Cosmetic Products Used in Synergy
Clinical Evaluation of the Cutaneous Acceptability, Comedogenic Potential and Efficacy of Two Cosmetic Products Used in Synergy
1 other identifier
observational
46
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The open, intra-individual study aims to assess the cutaneous acceptability, comedogenic potential and efficacy of a cleansing gel and a cream used in synergy to relieve patients presenting with acne grade 2 and 3. Each subject is her/his own control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 11, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2022
CompletedAugust 9, 2022
August 1, 2022
10 months
August 2, 2022
August 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
change in cutaneous acceptability by the dermatologist with a 5-point scale
assessment of the acceptability of the parameters erythema, edema, dryness, desquamation, roughness on a 5-point scale (none, very mild, mild, moderate, severe)
from baseline to Day56
change in cutaneous acceptability by the participant with a 5-point scale
assessment of the acceptability of the parameters tightness, stinging, itching, warm/burning sensation on a 5-point scale (none, very mild, mild, moderate, severe)
from baseline to Day56
change in comedogenic potential
The variations (Day28-Day0, Day56-Day0) in the number of lesions are calculated for each kind of lesions. Descriptive statistics are done in order to determine the variation significance. * a non-comedogenic product does not induce any significant increase in the number of retentional lesions. * a non-acnegenic product does not induce any significant increase in the number of inflammatory lesions.
from baseline to Day56
change in Global Evaluation Acne (GEA) score
The dermatologist realizes clinical score of the product's anti-acne efficacy using the Investigator Global Acne Severity Score with a 6-point scale: from 0 Clear. No lesions. to 5. Very severe
from baseline to Day56
Eligibility Criteria
participants with acne grade 2 and 3 meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreeing to the study contraints
You may qualify if:
- phototype I to VI according to the following distribution:
- female subjects of \<18 years old and phototype I or II, 7 male subjects of \<18 years old and phototype I or II, 7 female subjects of \>18 years old and phototype I or II, 7 male subjects of \>18 years old and phototype I or II,
- female subjects of \<18 years old and phototype III or IV, 7 male subjects of \<18 years old and phototype III or IV, 7 female subjects of \>18 years old and phototype III or IV, 7 male subjects of \>18 years old and phototype III or IV,
- female subjects of \<18 years old and phototype V or VI, 7 male subjects of \<18 years old and phototype V or VI, 7 female subjects of \>18 years old and phototype V or VI, 7 male subjects of \>18 years old and phototype V or VI
- Caucasian (in Dermscan in Poland) and Negroid (in Insight Research in Mauritius)
You may not qualify if:
- cutaneous pathology on the studied zone other than acne (eczema, ...)
- topical acne treatment since less than one month
- participant manipulating her/ his acne lesions
- excessive exposure to sunlight or UV-rays within the previous month
- use of topical or systemic treatment during the previous weeks liable to interfere with the assessment of the acceptability and efficacy of the studied products (according to the investigator's appreciation)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Insight Research
Quatre Bornes, Mauritius
Dermscan Poland Sp. z o. o.
Gdansk, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Katarzyna Bednarczyk
Eurofins
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2022
First Posted
August 5, 2022
Study Start
January 13, 2021
Primary Completion
November 11, 2021
Study Completion
November 11, 2021
Last Updated
August 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08