NCT05489757

Brief Summary

The accurate assessment of intraoperative tissue perfusion is essential in any branch of surgery. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most feared complications following gastrointestinal surgery, with potentially threatening consequences resulting in worsened short- and long-term outcomes. Consistently, a recent meta-analysis showed a correlation between AL and shorter disease-free survival in colorectal surgery. Despite its multifactorial origin, AL is highly related to inadequate visceral perfusion. Traditionally, perfusion assessment and subsequent anastomotic viability have been evaluated by surgeons using intraoperative indicators, such as color, pulsation of vessels, presence of peristalsis and bleeding from the resection lines. However, these clinical parameters are not able to reliably assess the real visceral perfusion and their evaluation is limited in minimally invasive surgery. Hence, the growing interest for innovative techniques able to properly assess tissue perfusion. Among these, the fluorescence angiography (FA) with indocyanine green (ICG) has become increasingly popular during the last decade, although its approval for biomedical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dates back to 1956. ICG is an amphiphilic, non-toxic, tricarbocyanine iodide dye that can be safely injected intravenously and is exclusively eliminated by the liver, without any absorption. Thanks to its fluorescent properties, it allows the real-time visualization of tissue vascularization. FA with ICG has shown promising results for the evaluation of perfusion in numerous surgical procedures, thus leading to modifications of the surgical strategy and consequently to a decrease in the rates of AL. On the other hand, ICG interpretation is subjective, based on the evaluation of fluorescence performed by the operating surgeon. These results lack into a high inter-observer variability and affect the possibility to obtain objective, reproducible and reliable tissue perfusion assessments. Quantitative fluorescence angiography with ICG (Q-ICG) could overcome these limitations. In Q-ICG the fluorescence signal is elaborated by a new computer quantification algorithm and translated into a fluorescence-time curve (FTC), from which several Q-ICG parameters and values can be extracted. Given the power of ICG in reflecting the perfusion of examined tissues, a new quantification algorithm has the potential to turn the subjective parameters derived from surgeon's perspective into objective numeric values. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate which Q-ICG values provided by a new quantification algorithm correspond to subjective perfusion parameters usually evaluated by the surgeon in patients undergoing left colon, rectal or esophagogastric resections. The secondary aim is to evaluate possible correlations between Q-ICG values provided by the quantification algorithm and perioperative outcomes.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
239

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 16, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 5, 2022

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

November 28, 2023

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

ICG quantificationEsophagectomyColorectal resectionPerfusion assessment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Maximum intensity of ICG fluorescence

    % (absolute value)

    One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.

  • Time to first ICG fluorescence signal

    seconds

    One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.

  • Time-to-peak

    seconds

    One timepoint: at day 0, after the externalization of colon/stomach, before packing the colorectal/esophagogastric anastomosis.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Correlation with postoperative outcomes

    From day 0 to day 30 after discharge

Interventions

Perfusion assessment with SPY Q-ICG system

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial
  • Male and Female, Age \> 18 years
  • Patients undergoing left colon, rectal or esophagogastric resections
  • Patients with malignant or benign disease
  • Minimally invasive or open approach surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Absence of esophagogastric or colorectal reconstruction (e.g. Miles procedure)
  • Limited sigmoid resection without ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity or intolerance to indocyanine green (ICG) or iodine contrast agents,
  • Patients with hyperthyroidism or benign thyroid tumor
  • Acute or chronic kidney failure (stage ≥ 3)
  • Pregnant or lactating women, or with a positive pregnancy test performed before surgery
  • Any clinical condition for which, in the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the patient or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Lorenzo Cinelli

Milan, 20132, Italy

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal FistulaRectal FistulaPostoperative Complications

Interventions

Drug Delivery Systems

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System FistulaDigestive System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesFistulaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsIntestinal FistulaIntestinal DiseasesRectal DiseasesPathologic Processes

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Drug TherapyTherapeutics

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Prospective, Interventional, Monocentric Cohort Study on Medical Device (CE marked, according to indications for use) Prospective, Observational, Monocentric, Pharmacologic Cohort Study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Research Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2022

First Posted

August 5, 2022

Study Start

February 16, 2022

Primary Completion

November 30, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

November 28, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations