GnRH Agonist for Luteal Phase Support.
Comparison of Pregnancy Rates After Luteal Phase Support With GnRH Agonist Versus Progesterone - a Prospective Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective To assess the the efficacy of luteal support with GnRH agonist in patients undergoing IVF in antagonist-based hcg triggered cycles compared with standard luteal support with progesterone. Design prospective randomized controled study Subjects Patients who underwent antagonist-based cycles performed in the "Shaare Zedek Medical Center" IVF clinic between 2020 and 2022 Intervention Intranasal GnRH-agonist or vaginal Progesterone for luteal support. Main outcome measures Pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates, ohss. The study cohort included 150 patients who underwent 164 cycles. A total of 127 cycles were included. Of them, 64 were treated with GnRH-a and 63 with progesterone. Hypothesis: This RCT suggests that GnRH-a for luteal phase support is associated with a higher positive β-hCG pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate, compared with standard progesterone support in an antagonist-based protocol triggered with hCG, while maintaining a similar safety profile.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedAugust 2, 2022
July 1, 2022
1.9 years
July 31, 2022
August 1, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pregnancy
\- positive Bhcg
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
clinical pregnancy
5 weeks
ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
GnRH-agonist group
EXPERIMENTALIn the GnRH-a group, LPS was initiated on the evening after the OPU, using Nafareline (Synarel nasal spray 200mg used once), followed by twice daily (total 400mg/day) until the day of serum β-hCG pregnancy test, and then stopped, regardless of the test results
Progesterone group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn the progesterone group, LPS was initiated on the morning after OPU, using micronized progesterone ( PV Utrogestan 300mg, 3 times daily), until serum β-hCG pregnancy tests results were available. If a β-hCG pregnancy was confirmed, LPS was continued until the end of the 8th gestational week
Interventions
GnRH agonist alone for luteal phase support in fresh IVF embryo transfer cycles
vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Shaare Zedek medical Center
Jerusalem, Israel
Related Publications (1)
Buhbut E, Nabulsi R, Avigdor G, Ben-Ami I. Comparison of pregnancy rates in antagonist cycles after luteal support with GnRH-agonist versus progesterone: prospective randomized study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jul;308(1):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07017-5. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
PMID: 37186265DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2022
First Posted
August 2, 2022
Study Start
June 8, 2020
Primary Completion
April 15, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
August 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07