A RCT of UBE vs. MIS-TLIF in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy Versus MIS-TLIF in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
340
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a new spinal minimally invasive technique improved for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (LSP). The present study aims to establish a multicenter, large sample, randomized controlled study to explore the technical advantages and surgical indications of this new technique in the treatment of LSP by comparing with the classical minimally invasive posterior spinal interbody fusion; to compare the postoperative clinical and imaging results and analyze the surgical complications and preventive measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 29, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.7 years
July 28, 2022
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
ODI score
the D-value between the preoperative ODI score and 2-year-postoperative ODI score
2 year postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
UBE
EXPERIMENTALThe patient treated with unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)
MIS-TLIF
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient treated with classical minimally invasive posterior spinal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF)
Interventions
There are two surgical treatments for lumbar spondylolisthesis; one is UBE, and another is MIS-TLIF
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lumbar spondylolisthesis,
- yrs\<age\< 75yrs
- fusion levels \<2
You may not qualify if:
- greater than Lenke-slivia classification III
- severe osteoporosis (t value \<2.5)
- ASA 》IV
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
MUTCH J, WALMSLEY R. The aetiology of cleft vertebral arch in spondylolisthesis. Lancet. 1956 Jan 14;270(6907):74-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(56)92130-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 13287061RESULTOster BA, Kikanloo SR, Levine NL, Lian J, Cho W. Systematic Review of Outcomes Following 10-Year Mark of Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jun 15;45(12):820-824. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003485.
PMID: 32205705RESULTKwon JW, Park Y, Lee BH, Yoon SR, Ha JW, Kim H, Suk KS, Moon SH, Kim HS, Lee HM. Ten-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):773-780. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004334. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
PMID: 35125463RESULTPark SM, Park J, Jang HS, Heo YW, Han H, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS. Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
PMID: 31542473RESULTLightsey HM 4th, Pisano AJ, Striano BM, Crawford AM, Xiong GX, Hershman S, Schoenfeld AJ, Simpson AK. ALIF Versus TLIF for L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures Domains. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):808-816. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004333. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
PMID: 35125462RESULTHeo DH, Lee DC, Park CK. Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
PMID: 31042664RESULT
Related Links
- Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis
- ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures
- Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gang CHEN, MD.
2nd hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D and MD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2022
First Posted
July 29, 2022
Study Start
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We have not decided when to share the plan. We plan to share it after the study completion.