The Influence of Manual Therapy Applied to the Cervical Spine in the Prevention of Balance Disorders in the Elderly
ManEq
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Falling is a major trauma that can occur with aging, leading to very significant psychological and physical health effects with financial and societal consequences. It is therefore essential to explore therapeutic treatments that can reduce this risk. Some recognized effective treatments exist, concerning in particular the re-education of the muscles of the lower limbs. However, to our knowledge, none of them focus on the cervical spine although the latter is located at an essential physiological crossroads. Manual therapy, which has already demonstrated its impact on pain and balance parameters in the elderly, could be a painless and non-invasive tool of choice in addressing this problem.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 28, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.6 years
May 20, 2022
July 26, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
change of SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery test) score at day 0 after 1 intervention
The subject will then be asked to stand up and perform the different steps of the Short Physical Performance Battery test following the instructions of the evaluator, leading to a score between 0 (worse score) and 12 (best score)
at Day 0 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
change of SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery test) score at day 7 after a second intervention
The subject will then be asked to stand up and perform the different steps of the Short Physical Performance Battery test following the instructions of the evaluator, leading to a score between 0 (worse score) and 12 (best score)
at Day 7 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
SPPB (Short Physical Performance Battery test) score at day 21
The subject will then be asked to stand up and perform the different steps of the Short Physical Performance Battery test following the instructions of the evaluator, leading to a score between 0 (worse score) and 12 (best score)
at Day 21 in both groups before the intervention for sham group
change of walking speed at day 0 after 1 intervention
The subject will performed a 4m gait measurement
at Day 0 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
change of walking speed at day 7 after a second intervention intervention
The subject will performed a 4m gait measurement
at Day 7 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
walking speed at day 21
The subject will performed a 4m gait measurement
at Day 21 in both groups, before the intervention for sham group
Secondary Outcomes (18)
change in Heart Rate Variability at day 0 after 1 intervention
at Day 0 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
change in Heart Rate Variability at day 7 after the second intervention
at Day 7 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
Heart Rate Variability at day 21
at Day 21 before the intervention for sham group
change in cervical range of motion at day 0 after 1 intervention
at Day 0 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
change in cervical range of motion at day 7 after the second intervention
at Day 7 before and immediately after intervention in both groups
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Sham (ligth touch)
SHAM COMPARATORPlacebo intervention composed of light touch treatment on the cervical spine.
Manual therapy
EXPERIMENTALManual therapy applied to the cervical spine.
Interventions
The manual therapy intervention is performed twice on the experimental group, once on day 0 (D0) and the second time on day 7 (D7). This intervention consists of a manual therapy protocol (base on myofascial release) applied to the cervical spine. Protocol consists of succession of techniques: suboccipital decompression, disengagement of Cervical 0-1-2,vibratory stimulation at C4 level and myofascial release technique of the cervical aponeuroses. Outcomes are evaluated before and after intervention.The same schedule will be reproduced on D7. On D21, only one assessment will be done at the beginning of the session.
The Sham group receives placebo treatment twice (D0 and D7). This placebo treatment also called "light touch" treatment consists of applying light pressure with broad support from both hands on either side of the joint, in contact with the skin, without equal bone pressure or therapeutic intention, for a duration comparable to that of manual therapy. Outcomes are evaluation before and after placebo intervention. The same schedule will be reproduced at D7. On D21, only one assessment will be done at the beginning of the session and a manual therapy treatment on the cervical spine is provided to balance access to care in the two group
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older, of either sex
- Autonomous, able to walk ten meters alone without walking aid
- Able to understand instructions necessary for the correct performance of the measurements.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients suffering from a locomotor handicap or severe chronic progressive pathologies preventing the protocol from being carried out correctly
- Patient who has an history of surgery - fracture - dislocation of the cervical spine
- Patient who has cognitive impairments (Mini Mental Statement \<20)
- Patient who has life expectancy less than 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- EZUS-LYON 1lead
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
Lyon, Rhône, 69004, France
Related Publications (1)
Pinloche L, Souvignet S, Germain M, Monteil K, Hautier C. The short-term effect of a myofascial protocol versus light touch applied to the cervical spine towards the prevention of balance disorders in the elderly: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2022 Aug 31;30(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12998-022-00446-0.
PMID: 36045446DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurianne PINLOCHE, MD
Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2022
First Posted
July 27, 2022
Study Start
February 4, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 28, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share