NCT05474521

Brief Summary

Due to the impracticality of accessing the gold standard test devices, researchers have developed easy-to-use and cost-effective smartphone applications that do not require expert knowledge, and these applications have been used to measure different motor abilities. Smartphone applications such as CODtimer, Stopwatch Movie watch, and Seconds Count are used to evaluate the ability to change direction within these biomotor features. However, the validity and reliability of these applications are the subjects of research.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 10, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 2, 2022

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 20, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 20, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 26, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

July 20, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 23, 2022

Conditions

Training GroupSensitivity

Keywords

Performance testSmarthone appAgility

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The relationship of smartphone apps versus gold standard measuring tool in measuring direction change performance

    Two photocell doors with a height of 1.5 meters and a distance of 2 meters were placed at the beginning and the end of the test. However, to take measurements with smartphone applications, video recordings were made with smartphones from a height of 1.5, 2 meters away from the photocell, parallel to the ending and starting points. To measure with the stopwatch, the researchers were positioned 1 meter next to the photocell at the endpoint. At the beginning of the test, the exit positions of the participants were standardized, and each participant applied the illinois test twice with three minutes of listening. The means of the obtained values were determined according to the following formula; (first trial time\[second\]+ second trial time\[second\])/2. Hypothesis tests were performed with trial time mean. It was assumed that the shorter the test times of the athletes, the better their performance.

    1-week

Study Arms (30)

Participant 1

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 2

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 3

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 4

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 5

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 6

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 7

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 8

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 9

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 10

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 11

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 12

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 13

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 14

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 15

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 16

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 17

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 18

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 19

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 20

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 21

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 22

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 23

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 24

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 25

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 26

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 27

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 28

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 29

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Participant 30

EXPERIMENTAL

The participant applied the Illinois test twice to determine the validity, reliability, and usefulness of the data collection tools.

Device: CODTimer test

Interventions

CODTimer testDEVICE

The Illinois test times of the participants will be measured with different phone applications that measure the change of direction performance, and each individual will perform the test twice.

Also known as: Stopwatch Moviewatch App, Seconds Count, Stopwatch, Photocell
Participant 1Participant 10Participant 11Participant 12Participant 13Participant 14Participant 15Participant 16Participant 17Participant 18Participant 19Participant 2Participant 20Participant 21Participant 22Participant 23Participant 24Participant 25Participant 26Participant 27Participant 28Participant 29Participant 3Participant 30Participant 4Participant 5Participant 6Participant 7Participant 8Participant 9

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Athletes who have not experienced an injury in the last 1 year and have a training history of at least one year.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Sport Science

Burdur, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Huseyin Sahin UYSAL

Burdur, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypersensitivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Huseyin Sahin Uysal, Msc

    Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: This study was performed according to the predictive correlational research design, which is one of the quantitative research methods. Participants included in the study were determined according to the simple random sampling method. Athletes who studied at the faculty of sports sciences participated in this research and the research was carried out with a single group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2022

First Posted

July 26, 2022

Study Start

March 10, 2022

Primary Completion

June 2, 2022

Study Completion

June 20, 2022

Last Updated

July 26, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Locations

TU(2)