Comparison of Surgical Approaches in Reducing Mandibular Angle Fracture
Comparison of Intra-oral and Extra-oral Surgical Approach in Reducing Fractures at the Angle of the Mandible
1 other identifier
interventional
360
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compared the surgical approach to the lower jaw fractures, an approach from the face and an approach from inside the mouth were used and compared for the outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2022
CompletedJuly 20, 2022
July 1, 2022
6 months
July 18, 2022
July 19, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Indication of post-surgical infections
Redness, swelling, pain, bleeding, or any discharge
Up to three weeks
Limited jaw opening
Mouth opening considered limited if the patient can only open mouth to a width of less than the width of his/her three fingers (index, middle, ring).
Up to three weeks
Study Arms (2)
Intra-Oral Surgical approach
EXPERIMENTALThe mandibular fracture was reduced using an intra-oral surgical approach.
Extra-Oral Surgical approach
EXPERIMENTALAn External/Facial approach was used to reduce the mandibular bone fracture.
Interventions
An incision on the skin over the mandible versus incision on the gingivae inside the mouth
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged 16 to 60 years
- Both Genders.
- Patients undergoing surgery for mandibular angle fracture
You may not qualify if:
- Pathological fractures.
- Condylar and sub-condylar fractures.
- Edentulous patients.
- Fire arm injury (FAI).
- Fractures of the middle third of face.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ayub Teaching Hospitallead
- Université Montpelliercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ayub Teaching Hospital
Abbottābād, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 22010, Pakistan
Related Publications (12)
1. Abbas I, Ali K. Management of mandibular fractures a prospective study; Pak Oral Dent 2007;22:151-2.
BACKGROUND2. Muzzafar K. Management of maxillofacial trauma. AFID Dent J 2008;10:18-21.
BACKGROUND3. Nayyak MS, Ekanayake MBK. Assessment of maxillofacial injuries. Pakistan Oral Dent J 2007;21:12-8.
BACKGROUNDAbbas I, Ali K, Mirza YB. Spectrum of mandibular fractures at a tertiary care dental hospital in Lahore. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2003 Apr-Jun;15(2):12-4.
PMID: 14552240BACKGROUND5. Zaki MA, Islam T, Mamon S, Aleem A. Pattern of maxillofacial injuries received at Abassi Shaheed Hospital, KMDC, Karachi. Annual Abassi Shaheed Hosp. 2008;7:291-3.
BACKGROUNDLawoyin DO, Lawoyin JO, Lawoyin TO. Fractures of the facial skeleton in Tabuk North West Armed Forces Hospital: a five year review. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1996 Dec;25(4):385-7.
PMID: 9532313BACKGROUNDEdwards TJ, David DJ, Simpson DA, Abbott AA. Patterns of mandibular fractures in Adelaide, South Australia. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994 May;64(5):307-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1994.tb02216.x.
PMID: 8179524BACKGROUND8. Patel MF. Fixation techniques & mandibular osteosynthesis. In: Langdon JD, Patel MF. Operative maxillofacial surgery. 1st ed London: Chapman & Hall, 2005;331-45.
BACKGROUNDRenton TF, Wiesenfeld D. Mandibular fracture osteosynthesis: a comparison of three techniques. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Apr;34(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(96)90372-1.
PMID: 8861293BACKGROUNDMoreno JC, Fernandez A, Ortiz JA, Montalvo JJ. Complication rates associated with different treatments for mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Mar;58(3):273-80; discussion 280-1. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(00)90051-x.
PMID: 10716108BACKGROUND11. Risdon F: Ankylosis of Temporomandibular Joint. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 21:1933.
BACKGROUND12. Ali S, Warraich A. Comparison of two surgical procedures in reduction of mandibular angle fracture. Pak oral Dent J. 2010;30(2):287-90.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alman Khan, BDS,FCPS
Ayub Teaching Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2022
First Posted
July 20, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
August 31, 2017
Study Completion
August 31, 2017
Last Updated
July 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
These are walk-in patients to the facility and we are officially obligated to keep their confidentiality. The facility may be approached for the data and data maybe provided subject to the approval of the subjects.