Comparison of Hyaluronidase and Dexametasone in Reduction of Postoperative Edema
Comparison of the Effects of Hyaluronidase and Dexamethasone on Reduction of Postoperative Edema in Impacted Wisdom Teeth Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
The present study is designed to reveal effectiveness of hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on reduction of postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection. For this purpose, 60 participants with symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth enrolled the present study. All measurements and evaluations were performed before and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days later the operation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2022
CompletedJuly 20, 2022
July 1, 2022
2.6 years
July 13, 2022
July 15, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (92)
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase experimental group
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in hyaluronidase control group
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in hyaluronidase control group
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in hyaluronidase control group
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in hyaluronidase control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in hyaluronidase control group
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone experimental group
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone experimental group
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone experimental group
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone experimental group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone experimental group
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 1. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 2. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 3. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the increase of edema in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape in dexamethasone control group
preoperative edema amount was subtracted from edema amount in 7. day in dexamethasone controlgroup
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between hyaluronidase experimental and hyaluronidase control groups in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of hyaluronidase experimental group was compared with that of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 1. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 2. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 3. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the difference in increase amounts of edema between dexamethasone experimental and dexamethasone control groups in postoperative 7. day using a measuring tape
edema increase amount of dexamethasone experimental group was compared with that of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
postoperative 4. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
postoperative 5. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
postoperative 6. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
postoperative 4. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
postoperative 5. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
postoperative 6. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in hyaluronidase control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
postoperative 4. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
postoperative 5. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
postoperative 6. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone experimental group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 1. day
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 2. day
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 3. day
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 4. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 4. day
postoperative 4. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 5. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 5. day
postoperative 5. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 6. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 6. day
postoperative 6. day
evaluation of the pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day
pain intensity of the patients in dexamethasone control group was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and daily count of NSAİ drug intake in postoperative 7. day
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group preoperatively.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
preoperative
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group preoperatively.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
preoperative
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group preoperatively.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
preoperative
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group preoperatively.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
preoperative
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of trismus using a ruler, which measures the opening between mandibular and maxillary right first incisors of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day.
amount of trismus is revealed measuring the distance between the tips of incisal edges of mandibular and maxillary right first incisors using a ruler
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group preoperatively.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
preoperative
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 1. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 2. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 3. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase experimental group in postoperative 7. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group preoperatively.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
preoperative
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 1. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 2. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 3. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of hyaluronidase control group in postoperative 7. day.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group preoperatively.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
preoperative
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 1. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 2. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 3. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone experimental group in postoperative 7. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 7. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group preoperatively.
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
preoperatively
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 1. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 1. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 2. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 2. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 3. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 3. day
evaluation of infection in operation site via determination of infection signs in physical examination of dexamethasone control group in postoperative 7. day
existence of infection signs were determined using physical examination method. if the count of + signs are more than half of total amount of determined signs, the evaluation is accepted as (+) infected.
postoperative 7. day
Study Arms (4)
hyaluronidase
EXPERIMENTALhyaluronidase control
NO INTERVENTIONdexamethasone
EXPERIMENTALdexamethasone control
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
injection of 150 IU hyaluronidase to perioperative region, submucosally.
injection of 8 mg dexamethasone to perioperative region, submucosally.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- symmetrical mandibular wisdom teeth with bone retention
- patients who are signed informed consent and acceptance of study involvement forms
You may not qualify if:
- existence of any systemic disease
- existence of any periodical drug intake
- existence of difference in operation times of right and left impacted wisdom teeth extractions more than 5 minutes
- existence of pregnancy
- existence of breastfeeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Near East University
Nicosia, 99138, Cyprus
Hacettepe University
Ankara, Sıhhiye, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Koc O, Er N, Karaca C, Bilginaylar K. Comparison of the effects of submucosal hyaluronidase and dexamethasone on postoperative edema, pain, trismus, and infection following impacted third molar surgery. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):1018. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04729-1.
PMID: 39215323DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2022
First Posted
July 20, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
July 20, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share