NCT05465577

Brief Summary

This trial is a mixed-methods, non-randomized design guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to develop, implement, and evaluate Coverage and Cost-of-Care Links (CC Links) -a novel financial navigation intervention for hematologic cancer survivors and their caregivers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
94

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

July 15, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

financial navigationquality of lifehardshipcaregiversfinancial toxicity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in coping behaviors

    "Coping behaviors" was measured using a series of 9 yes/no items that first assess whether any recommended cancer care was skipped for any reason (yes/no), and then whether the reason for not receiving the care that they or their doctor believed necessary was due to any of 8 listed reasons (yes/no for each). Typical reasons included 'Couldn't afford care,' 'Insurance company wouldn't approve or pay for care,' and 'Had problems getting to the doctor's office.' The sum of the number of yes responses is the total score, with higher scores indicating greater coping behaviors in response to financial hardship. The items in this scale are from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey - Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Survey (MEPS-ECSS).

    Approximately 8 months (baseline and following resolution of financial needs)

  • Change in material conditions

    "Material conditions" was measured using 8 items (6 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement (MEPS-ECSS) and 2 from demographic survey) that measure the financial condition of the participant with cancer and their family. Six of the items are yes/no and these include questions on borrowing money or go into debt, filing for bankruptcy, and concerns about having to pay large medical bills because of the cost of cancer treatment. The remaining two items are ordinal and measure the amount of debt related to cancer costs (options range from $0 to $100,00+), and the how they perceive their household's income currently (choices range from 'living comfortably on present income' to 'finding it very difficult on present income'). The latter two items are rescaled to 0-1 variables, so they have the same ranges as the yes/no items and are summed to create the total score. Higher scores indicate greater financial hardship.

    Approximately 8 months (baseline and following resolution of financial needs)

  • Change in psychological response (financial toxicity)

    Psychological response (i.e. financial toxicity) was measured using the 11-item Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) that measures emotional aspects of financial hardship (financial toxicity) among cancer patients. Each item is scored on a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 0='Not at all' to 4='Very much.' Sample items include 'My out-of-pocket expense are more than I thought they would be' and 'I am frustrated that I cannot work or contribute as much as I usually do.' Lower values indicate greater financial toxicity.

    Approximately 8 months (baseline and following resolution of financial needs)

  • Change in health-related quality of life

    Health-related QOL was measured using four Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scales.xx Each of these were scored and standardized by submitting the raw values to the HealthMeasures scoring service. standardized values of the total scores were used throughout the analysis for this study. The four scales include the PROMIS physical health and emotional health subscales (from the 10-item PROMIS Scale v1.2 - Global Health),xx the 4-item PROMIS- Anxiety Short Form, and the 6-item PROMIS-Depression Short Form. The physical (physical health, function, pain, and fatigue items) and emotional health (QOL, mental health, social activities, and emotional problem items) subscales are each based on 4 items, with higher scores indicating a more positive health self-assessment. For the anxiety and depression scales, higher scores indicate a greater manifestation of symptoms.

    Approximately 8 months (baseline and following resolution of financial needs)

  • Change in distress.

    Distress was measured using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's (NCCN) Distress Thermometer and its accompanying 40-item problem list. A cutoff score of 4 indicated clinically elevated distress levels

    Approximately 8 months (baseline and following resolution of financial needs)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Financial Savings

    Approximately at 8 months (following resolution of financial needs)

Study Arms (2)

Financial Navigation- Patients Only

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients only participated in financial navigation program.

Other: CC Links

Financial Navigation- Patient and Caregiver

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients and their caregivers participated as a dyad in financial navigation program.

Other: CC Links

Interventions

The CC Links intervention is built on a platform of interdisciplinary team-based science, which ensured that the financial navigator worked closely with other members of the healthcare team including oncologists, nurses, transplant coordinators, social workers, and case managers, to help enhance financial hardship screening and connect survivors and caregivers with financial assistance services.

Financial Navigation- Patient and CaregiverFinancial Navigation- Patients Only

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • hematological cancer patients from the Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation at the University of Kentucky
  • caregivers of cancer patients
  • positive screening for financial hardship

You may not qualify if:

  • \- unable to provide consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Financial StressHematologic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress, PsychologicalBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Jean S Edward, PhD, RN

    University of Kentucky

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2022

First Posted

July 20, 2022

Study Start

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion

February 1, 2022

Study Completion

February 1, 2022

Last Updated

July 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations