Vaginal Biorevitalization With Polydeoxyribonucleotides for the Improvement of the Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
VABIP
VABIP Study (Vaginal Biorevitalization With Polydeoxyribonucleotides) for the Improvement of the Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
1 other identifier
interventional
136
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of vaginal biorevitalization to improve the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) between the gold-standard treatment with local estrogen-based hormone therapy versus local salmon polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedApril 11, 2023
April 1, 2023
5 months
July 15, 2022
April 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Change from baseline urogenital domain score in the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at 3 months
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Items 9, 10 and 11 evaluate the urogenital domain. 0 points were considered asymptomatic, 1point indicated mild symptoms, 2-3 points moderate symptoms and \> 4 indicated severe symptoms.
3 months
Change from baseline Item 9 Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Item 9 assesses the severity of sexual problems, including changes in libido, sexual activity, and dyspareunia. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
3 months
Change from baseline Item 10 Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Item 10 assesses the severity of urinary problems such as polyuria, urinary urgency, bladder instability, and urinary incontinence. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
3 months
Change from baseline Item 11 Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Item 11 assesses the severity of vaginal dryness. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
3 months
Change from baseline Vaginal Maturity Index (VMI) at 3 months
The vaginal maturation index (VMI) is used to assess the hormonal status of the vaginal epithelium, which quantifies the proportions of cell types in the vaginal epithelium. The VMI was evaluated through vaginal cytology, where the percentage of basal/parabasal, intermediate and superficial cells were calculated.
3 months
Change from baseline Estrogenic Effect at 3 months
The estrogenic effect is used to evaluate the local action of estrogens in the vaginal epithelium. The higher value, it means that it is having a greater trophic effect due to local estrogen stimulation. To calculate this outcome, it was used the next formula: Estrogenic effect= \[(% of basal/parabasal cells\*0)+(% of intermediate cells\*0.5)+(% of superficial cells\*1)\]
3 months
Change from baseline Oxford grading scale at 3 months
The Oxford grading scale evaluates the contraction capacity of the muscles of the pelvic floor. It was used at the time of vaginal examination. 0 points meant no contraction , 1 point a flicker contraction, 2 points a weak contraction, 3 points a moderate contraction, 4 points a good contraction, and 5 points a strong contraction.
3 months
Change from baseline vaginal pH at 3 months
Vaginal pH tests measure the acidity of the vagina. A normal vaginal pH value was considered when it was between 4.0 and 5.
3 months
Change from baseline colposcopic findings at 3 months
The presence or absence of vaginal folds, paleness and vaginal lesions were colposcopic findings that were evaluated as nominal dichotomous variables. Lugol's staining was performed during colposcopy. The degree of Lugol's staining was evaluated as an ordinal variable with 4 degrees, depending on the intensity of staining of the vaginal mucosa.
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Polynucleotide vaginal suppositories
EXPERIMENTALIn this arm 72 first-time participants of the "peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic" of the "Regional Hospital October 1st " of ISSSTE Mexico, were randomly enrolled to be treated with local salmon polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) therapy.
Conjugated estrogens cream
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm 64 first-time participants of the "peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic" of the "Regional Hospital October 1st " of ISSSTE Mexico, were randomly enrolled to be treated with the gold-standard treatment with local estrogen-based hormone therapy.
Interventions
3 g polynucleotide vaginal suppositories were administered nightly for 6 days.
Conjugated estrogen cream 1g was applied intravaginally on Monday, Wednesday and Friday for three months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-time patients with the diagnosis of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause with an MRS \> 5 in the urogenital domain, with alterations in the vaginal maturity index (VMI).
You may not qualify if:
- Incomplete clinical records.
- History of prolonged use of steroids.
- Use of alternative local therapies applied in the vagina's mucosa.
- Use of local therapies with vaginal suppositories for any reason 15 days before the beginning of the study.
- Clinical evidence of infectious cervical-vaginitis or vulvovaginitis.
- Evidence of urinary tract infection (UTI).
- Lack of adherence to medical treatment.
- Diagnosis of cancer.
- Diagnosis of depression.
- Diagnosis of uncontrolled primary or secondary immunodeficiencies.
- Allergies to any of the medications administered.
- BIRADS \>2 or high risk of developing breast cancer, ovarian cancer or endometrial cancer.
- Use of oral hormonal or non-hormanl therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital Regional 1o de Octubrelead
- Hospital General Regional No. 1 IMSScollaborator
- Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexicocollaborator
- National Polytechnic Institute, Mexicocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE
Mexico City, 07300, Mexico
Related Publications (11)
The NAMS 2020 GSM Position Statement Editorial Panel. The 2020 genitourinary syndrome of menopause position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2020 Sep;27(9):976-992. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001609.
PMID: 32852449BACKGROUNDSchneider HP, Heinemann LA, Rosemeier HP, Potthoff P, Behre HM. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): reliability of scores of menopausal complaints. Climacteric. 2000 Mar;3(1):59-64. doi: 10.3109/13697130009167600.
PMID: 11910611BACKGROUNDHeinemann K, Assmann A, Mohner S, Schneider HP, Heinemann LA. [Reliability of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): Investigation in the German population]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2002 Mar;124(3):161-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32268. German.
PMID: 12070795BACKGROUNDSchneider HP, Rosemeier HP, Schnitker J, Gerbsch S, Turck R. Application and factor analysis of the menopause rating scale [MRS] in a post-marketing surveillance study of Climen. Maturitas. 2000 Dec 29;37(2):113-24. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(00)00177-8.
PMID: 11137330BACKGROUNDHeinemann K, Ruebig A, Potthoff P, Schneider HP, Strelow F, Heinemann LA, Do MT. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scale: a methodological review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 2;2:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-45.
PMID: 15345062BACKGROUNDWeber MA, Limpens J, Roovers JP. Assessment of vaginal atrophy: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan;26(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2464-0. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
PMID: 25047897BACKGROUNDMcCracken JM, Balaji S, Keswani SG, Hakim JC. An Avant-Garde Model of Injury-Induced Regenerative Vaginal Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 Apr;10(4):165-173. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1198. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
PMID: 32602816BACKGROUNDChung HS, Lee HS, Park K. Estrogen modulates epithelial progenitor cells in rat vagina. Investig Clin Urol. 2021 May;62(3):349-353. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200513. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
PMID: 33834644BACKGROUNDRahn DD, Carberry C, Sanses TV, Mamik MM, Ward RM, Meriwether KV, Olivera CK, Abed H, Balk EM, Murphy M; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group. Vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;124(6):1147-1156. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000526.
PMID: 25415166BACKGROUNDNappi RE, Martini E, Cucinella L, Martella S, Tiranini L, Inzoli A, Brambilla E, Bosoni D, Cassani C, Gardella B. Addressing Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA)/Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) for Healthy Aging in Women. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 21;10:561. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00561. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31496993BACKGROUNDThe NAMS 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement Advisory Panel. The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2017 Jul;24(7):728-753. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000921.
PMID: 28650869RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Juan M Ocampo-Godinez, M.D., Ph.D.
Laboratorio de Bioingenieria de Tejidos, UNAM
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patricia Loranca-Moreno, M.D., M.Sc.
Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre, ISSSTE
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The pathologist and colposcopists were blinded to the treatment the participants received.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 15, 2022
First Posted
July 19, 2022
Study Start
June 23, 2021
Primary Completion
November 23, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
April 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04