Retrospective Review on PAEDIATRIC and ADOLESCENT ADNEXAL MASSES
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To review the characteristic, presentation and outcome of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedAugust 15, 2022
August 1, 2022
1.4 years
June 23, 2022
August 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
To review the characteristic of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the characteristic of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
To review the imaging findings of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the imaging findings of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
To review the biochemical markers of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the biochemical markers of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
To review the operative record of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the operative record of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
To review the histopathological findings of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the histopathological findings of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
To review the post-operative complications of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the post-operative complications of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
To review the post-operative menstrual symptoms of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the post-operative menstrual symptoms of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
To review the subsequent reproductive outcome of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
To review the subsequent reproductive outcome of girls presented with adnexal masses to hopefully develop a management algorithm for girls with adnexal masses.
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
girls with adnexal mass
All girls who presented with adnexal mass from 0-21 years old (inclusive). Subjects will be identified from review of clinical records. Girl aged 21 or below who attended the NTEC cluster from 1990-2021 with available medical records.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Expecting number of record will be reviewed: 300. Participant will be identified from review of clinical records. Participants aged 21 or below who attended the NTEC cluster from 1990-2021 with available medical records. Since not all data are available in each case, expecting 300 patient records will be reviewed to have target 139 completed record. Total number of females from HK census in 2021: 0-19 years old: 521857 9-11% are malignant Sample size calculation work with a 95% confidence level; Confidence interval (margin of error) of ± 5%; Population portion of 10% Population size: 521857 Sample size=139
You may qualify if:
- girls who presented with adnexal mass
- aged 0-21 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Girls older than 21 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (7)
Takayasu H, Masumoto K, Tanaka N, Aiyoshi T, Sasaki T, Ono K, Chiba F, Urita Y, Shinkai T. A clinical review of ovarian tumors in children and adolescents. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020 Jun;36(6):701-709. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04660-w. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
PMID: 32346848BACKGROUNDAkakpo PK, Derkyi-Kwarteng L, Quayson SE, Gyasi RK, Anim JT. Ovarian Tumors in Children and Adolescents: A 10-Yr Histopathologic Review in Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2016 Jul;35(4):333-6. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000257.
PMID: 26630227BACKGROUNDAmor F, Vaccaro H, Alcazar JL, Leon M, Craig JM, Martinez J. Gynecologic imaging reporting and data system: a new proposal for classifying adnexal masses on the basis of sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Mar;28(3):285-91. doi: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.3.285.
PMID: 19244063BACKGROUNDAndreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM, Froyman W, Benacerraf BR, Bennett GL, Bourne T, Brown DL, Coleman BG, Frates MC, Goldstein SR, Hamper UM, Horrow MM, Hernanz-Schulman M, Reinhold C, Rose SL, Whitcomb BP, Wolfman WL, Glanc P. O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):168-185. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191150. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
PMID: 31687921BACKGROUNDStankovic ZB, Sedlecky K, Savic D, Lukac BJ, Mazibrada I, Perovic S. Ovarian Preservation from Tumors and Torsions in Girls: Prospective Diagnostic Study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017 Jun;30(3):405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
PMID: 28137453BACKGROUNDTimmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C, Paladini D, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Van Huffel S, Valentin L. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;31(6):681-90. doi: 10.1002/uog.5365.
PMID: 18504770BACKGROUNDAldrink JH, Gonzalez DO, Sales SP, Deans KJ, Besner GE, Hewitt GD. Using quality improvement methodology to improve ovarian salvage for benign ovarian masses. J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct 10:S0022-3468(17)30638-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.016. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 29106919BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
KAREN NG, PI
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2022
First Posted
July 18, 2022
Study Start
August 12, 2022
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
August 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08