NCT05461586

Brief Summary

Prospective, multi-center, non-interventional, randomized, comparative clinical study to identify an optimal refractive technique that provides maximum plus refractive endpoint for best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2022

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 14, 2022

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 18, 2022

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 9, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 9, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

26 days

First QC Date

July 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

January 4, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Difference between two manifest refractive techniques on outcome variable MRSE

    Refractive technique 1 will use a plus lens fogging technique and refractive technique 2 will use the Duochrome technique to achieve maximum plus refraction for best-corrected visual acuity (BCDVA).

    Day 0

  • Difference between two manifest refractive techniques on visual acuity

    Refractive technique 1 will use a plus lens fogging technique and refractive technique 2 will use the Duochrome technique to achieve maximum plus refraction for best-corrected visual acuity (BCDVA).

    Day 0

Study Arms (2)

MR #1/MR #2

Subjects who participated in PCOL-102-AHSF who were bilaterally implanted with TECNIS IOL lenses will be randomized into the (MR #1/MR #2) sequence and receive two different maximum refractive techniques one at a time consecutively.

Device: Refractive Technique (MR #1)Device: Refractive Technique (MR #2)

MR#2/MR#1

Subjects who participated in PCOL-102-AHSF who were bilaterally implanted with TECNIS IOL lenses will be randomized into the (MR#2/MR#1) sequence and receive two different maximum refractive techniques one at a time consecutively.

Device: Refractive Technique (MR #1)Device: Refractive Technique (MR #2)

Interventions

Fogging method that employs fogging lens to ensure there is sufficient visual defocus to induce blur.

MR #1/MR #2MR#2/MR#1

Duochrome method that employs the chromatic aberration of the eye, with the shorter wavelengths (green) focused in front of the longer (red) wavelengths

MR #1/MR #2MR#2/MR#1

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participant in PCOL-102-AHSF who were bilaterally implanted with TECNIS IOL, Models C1V000, C2V000 or ICB00 and have completed and are at least 30 days postoperative from their second eye surgery.

You may qualify if:

  • Participant in PCOL-102-AHSF who were bilaterally implanted with TECNIS IOL, Models C1V000, C2V000 or ICB00 and have completed and are at least 30 days postoperative from their second eye surgery;
  • At least one implanted eye with clear ocular media;
  • Signed informed consent and HIPAA authorization or equivalent documentation necessary to comply with applicable privacy laws pertaining to medical treatment in Australia and New Zealand;
  • Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) worse than 0.66 decimal (6/9 or 20/30 Snellen);
  • Subjects with ongoing adverse events that might impact outcomes during the study visit as determined by the investigator.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sunshine Eye Clinic

Birtinya, Queensland, 4575, Australia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Refractive Errors

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. Clinical Trial

    Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2022

First Posted

July 18, 2022

Study Start

July 14, 2022

Primary Completion

August 9, 2022

Study Completion

August 9, 2022

Last Updated

January 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

More information

Locations