Vitamin D to ENhance TraUma REcovery
VENTURE
Randomized Controlled Trial of Vitamin D to Reduce Racial Disparity in Chronic Pain Following Motor Vehicle Collision
2 other identifiers
interventional
71
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to determine whether the administration of a single dose of Vitamin D in the Emergency Department following a motor vehicle collision can improve musculoskeletal pain severity as well as reduce musculoskeletal pain outcome disparity between Blacks and White following a motor vehicle collision. This randomized controlled trial is a pilot study to determine feasibility and potential efficacy (response to study drug, ability to reduce racial disparity in pain outcomes). This data can be used to adequately power a larger randomized controlled trial to fully assess efficacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 28, 2025
CompletedMarch 28, 2025
May 1, 2023
1.3 years
July 11, 2022
February 17, 2025
March 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Chronic Pain Severity
Estimates of efficacy will be obtained via repeated measures analysis of pain severity over the 3 months following injury using mixed effects models. Pain will be assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as severe as one can imagine. Higher scores represent worse outcome. These values (collected in identical fashion over 3 months following motor vehicle collision) will be entered into a linear mixed model, and overall effect estimates (beta coefficients) among treatment groups will be determined
Over 3 months following MVC
Chronic Pain Race X Treatment Arm Interaction
Estimates of interaction between race and treatment assignment will be obtained via repeated measures analysis of pain severity over the 3 months following injury using mixed effects models. Pain will be assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as severe as one can imagine. Higher scores represent worse outcome. These values (collected in identical fashion over 3 months following burn injury) will be entered into a linear mixed model, and the beta coefficient for the race by treatment interaction term will be assessed.
Over 3 months following MVC
Enrollment of the 90-participant Sample Size During Enrollment Period (Feasibility)
One feasibility measure of this study is demonstrating the ability to recruit 90 patients into the trial within 15 months of enrollment of the first participant. Feasibility of enrollment is defined as the number of potential participants screened for study eligibility versus the number of persons who enrolled in the study.
13 months of enrollment after the first participant
Percent of Participants Who Are Compliant With Follow-up (Feasibility)
The primary objective of this study is to ensure that the investigators are able to make follow-up assessments on a majority of participants. The percent of participants who are compliant with follow-up will be determined 3 months following their motor vehicle collision. Feasibility is defined as \>80% of enrolled participants at 3 months following Motor Vehicle Collision (MVC).
through study completion, 3 months following MVC
Study Arms (2)
Ergocalciferol (Vitamin D2)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR300,000 international units (IUs) of Ergocalciferol in 6 50,000 IU capsules. These will be given in a single dose prior to discharge from the Emergency Department.
Ergocalciferol placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInert substance will be administered in 6 capsules indistinguishable from the 50,000 IU Ergocalciferol capsules administered in the active treatment arm.
Interventions
300,000 international units (IUs) of Ergocalciferol in 6 50,000 IU capsules.
Inert substance will be administered in 6 capsules indistinguishable from the 50,000 IU
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years of age
- Admitted to ED within 24 hours of motor vehicle collision
- Plan to discharge to home from the emergency department
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study (with the exception of the blood draw sample collected in the ED, which is optional)
- Has a smartphone with continuous service \>1 year
- Able to speak and read English
- Alert and oriented, and capable of engaging in informed consent
- Willing to take on-time dose of study medication (6 capsules of Vitamin D or placebo)
- Non-Hispanic white or non-Hispanic black
- Point of care Vitamin D level \<100 ng/ml
- During ED admission pain severity must be at least 4/10 or higher
You may not qualify if:
- Substantial comorbid injury (e.g., long bone fracture)
- Pregnancy/breastfeeding
- Prisoner status
- Chronic daily opioid use prior to MVC (\>20 mg oral daily morphine equivalents)
- Active psychosis, suicidal ideation, or homicidal ideation
- Plans for hospital admission
- Known chronic kidney disease, stage 4 or higher (GFR≤29)
- Intubated and sedated at time of enrollment
- Inability to provide informed consent (receipt of sedative, hypnotic agent making the patient non-decisional for consent)
- Vitamin D supplements in excess of 800 IU daily
- Any other history or condition that would, in the site investigator's judgement, indicate that the patient would very likely be non-compliant with the study or unsuitable for the study (e.g., might interfere with the study, confound interpretation, or endanger patient)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
High rate of missing Vitamin D levels at 3-months could impact findings.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Sam McLean, MD, MPH
- Organization
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samuel McLean
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This will be a blinded study. Investigators, participants, and coordinators will be blinded to the treatment assignment. Active and placebo treatments will be indistinguishable.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2022
First Posted
July 14, 2022
Study Start
January 24, 2023
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 28, 2025
Results First Posted
March 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning 12 months following publication and continuing for 36 months
- Access Criteria
- Investigator has approved IRB, IEC, or REB and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared on request provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with the University of North Carolina (UNC).