Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision
1 other identifier
observational
382
1 country
3
Brief Summary
the investigators performed a retrospective multicenter propensity score matching study. From July 2016 to July 2021, 382 consecutive patients from different Chinese surgical departments were available for inclusion out of an initial cohort of 412, who underwent robotic or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2022
Shorter than P25 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2022
CompletedJuly 21, 2022
July 1, 2022
2 months
June 23, 2022
July 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
diseasefree survival(months)
Collect outcomes of follow-up and use Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to analyze it.
until July 2021
overall survival(months)
Collect outcomes of follow-up and use Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to analyze it.
until July 2021
Secondary Outcomes (10)
conversion rates
during the surgery
operative time
during the surgery
estimated blood loss
during the surgery
oral retake
up to 30 days after surgery
time to return to bowel function
up to 30 days after surgery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
robotic right hemicolectomy with CME
The robot was set to come and dock from the right shoulder of the patient. Three robotic 8-mm trocars (R1, R2 and R3) and two 12-mm trocars (camera and assistant port) were used for the robotic procedure. One working arm carrying a monopolar cautery hook/scissors for dissection was located in the left upper quadrant port (R1). The other two working arms carried bipolar forceps in the suprapubic port (R2), and Cadiere's fenestrated forceps in the right lower quadrant port (R3) that was used to keep the superior mesenteric axis in traction. After gentle cephalad traction on the transverse mesocolon with the grasp in R3, the assistant grasped the ileocecal valve through the assistant port to put the ileocolic vascular pedicle on tension and the ileocolic vessels were identified and lifted up with R2. All procedures were performed keeping the principle of complete mesocolic excision.
laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME
In the aparoscopic group, five trocars were used: a periumbilical incision and left upper quadrant for 12-mm trocars, both lower quadrants for 5-mm trocars, and the right quadrant for one more 5-mm trocar. A 30 degrees laparoscope was inserted through the periumbilical trocar site. After insertion of the trocars, the patient was placed in the Trendelenburg position with a 15 degrees rightward tilt. An ultrasonic device was used for dissection. All procedures were performed keeping the principle of complete mesocolic excision.
Interventions
The distribution of trocars was placed according to the position of Intuitive Surgical Inc. for robotic colectomy. The robot was set to come and dock from theright shoulder of the patient. Three robotic 8-mm trocars (R1, R2 and R3) and two 12-mm trocars (camera and assistant port) were used for the robotic procedure. One working arm carrying a monopolar cautery hook for dissection was located in the left upper quadrant port (R1). The other two working arms carried bipolar forceps in the suprapubic port (R3), and Cadiere's fenestrated forceps in the right lower quadrant port (R2) that was used to keep the superior mesenteric axis in traction. After gentle cephalad traction on the transversemesocolon with the grasp in R2, the assistant grasped the ileocecal valve through the assistant port to put the ileocolic vascular pedicle on tension and the ileocolic vessels were identified and lifted up with R3.
Eligibility Criteria
All consecutive patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME from July 2016 to July 2021 at three Chinese surgical departments (Department of General Surgery, Army Medical Center, Chongqing; Department of Colorectum, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing; Department of Colorectum, the 940th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Lanzhou) were included in the study
You may qualify if:
- Adenocarcinoma was confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy and it was located in the right colon.
- Preoperative enhanced abdominal CT examination showed no invasion of abdominal wall or adjacent organs.
- The patient underwent robotic or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME.
You may not qualify if:
- Multiple primary colorectal tumors
- Metastasis to abdominal
- Pelvic or distant organs
- Accompanied with bowel obstruction or perforation
- Neuroendocrine tumors
- Lymphomas
- Other malignant tumors.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital
Wanzhou, Chongqing Municipality, 404031, China
Army Medical Center
Yuzhong, Chongqing Municipality, 400042, China
No. 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Foce of Chinese People's Liberation Army
Lanzhou, Gansu, 730050, China
Related Publications (3)
Yozgatli TK, Aytac E, Ozben V, Bayram O, Gurbuz B, Baca B, Balik E, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T, Bugra D. Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 May;29(5):671-676. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0348. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
PMID: 30807257RESULTFerri V, Quijano Y, Nunez J, Caruso R, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Malave L, Isernia R, d'Ovidio A, Agresott R, Gomez P, Isojo R, Vicente E. Robotic-assisted right colectomy versus laparoscopic approach: case-matched study and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01084-5. Epub 2020 May 4.
PMID: 32367439RESULTSpinoglio G, Bianchi PP, Marano A, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Petz W, Borin S, Ribero D, Formisano G, Bertani E. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and 5-Year Survival in a Consecutive Series of 202 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3580-3586. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6752-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
PMID: 30218248RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2022
First Posted
July 14, 2022
Study Start
April 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
June 22, 2022
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07