FDFG Versus SMAS Flap After Superficial Parotidectomy; Evaluation of Functional and Esthetic Outcome
Free Dermal Fat Graft (FDFG) Versus Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Flap After Superficial Parotidectomy; Evaluation of Functional and Esthetic Outcome
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
After parotidectomy, Frey's syndrome and facial disfigurement are the most common encountered complications. Free dermal fat graft (FDFG) and the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap, have very promising results. In this study, the functional and esthetic outcome from their usage were compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2022
CompletedJuly 14, 2022
July 1, 2022
5.7 years
June 16, 2022
July 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with Frey's syndrome
Number of patients who developed of Frey's syndrome as post-parotidectomy complication
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Degree of patients' satisfaction with the fascial symmetry
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Free Dermal Fat Graft
ACTIVE COMPARATORFree Dermal Fat Graft (FDFG) is applied to the superficial parotidectomy defect site
Superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORSuperficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) Flap is dissected and tailored to fill the defect after superficial parotidectomy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients indicated for superficial parotidectomy
You may not qualify if:
- Less than 18 years of age
- Proved malignant parotid tumor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University
Shibīn al Kawm, Egypt
Related Publications (2)
Curry JM, King N, Reiter D, Fisher K, Heffelfinger RN, Pribitkin EA. Meta-analysis of surgical techniques for preventing parotidectomy sequelae. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009 Sep-Oct;11(5):327-31. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2009.62.
PMID: 19797095RESULTFawzy A, Balbaa MA, Hagag M. Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial. BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3):zrac173. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac173.
PMID: 37151084DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
M. Ashraf Balbaa, M.D.
Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2022
First Posted
July 11, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2021
Study Completion
October 31, 2021
Last Updated
July 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Six months from the time of study publication
- Access Criteria
- Contacting the corresponding author
Study protocol will be available to be shared on request after study publication for 6 months.