Developing a Dyadic Shared Decision Making Tool About Firearm Storage
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Given that firearm ownership is legal, common, and valued by many people in the U.S, safe storage is important to minimize the risk of unauthorized access, injury and death. Safe storage is particularly important in households with children, as they are at elevated risk of death by unintentional injury or suicide if a gun is accessible in the home. However, only 1/3 of firearm-owning parents with children in the home report consistently safe storage. Decisions about firearm storage are complex, with perceived costs and benefits of different storage options varying by individual factors (i.e., primary reasons for firearm ownership, types of firearms), family factors (i.e., age and mental and physical health of household members), and community factors (i.e., crime and norms). Storage decisions affect all household members, and prior research finds that firearm owners who discuss storage with other family members have the safest storage practices. However, a recent survey study of firearm-owning US parents of school-aged youth (n=749) found that in only 55% of parenting dyads are both parties highly involved in the decision about how firearms are stored. In this sample, investigators observed that safe storage was more likely when both members of a parenting dyad were highly involved in the storage decision (regardless of their gender and whether one or both own firearms). However, at present firearm storage interventions are directed at individuals rather than family systems. Given the prevalence of pediatric firearm injuries and the role of within-family processes in storage safety, there is a critical need to develop a feasible, self-directed, family-centered firearm safety intervention. The objective of the proposed short-term project is to develop and obtain preliminary data about acceptability and feasibility of a prototype of a brief decision aid for parenting dyads. The conceptual framework for the decision aid is the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, and then investigators will adapt the Ottawa Person Decision Guide for Two to this issue and for self-facilitation outside of the clinical setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 2, 2022
CompletedDecember 5, 2022
December 1, 2022
2 months
June 24, 2022
December 1, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in communication intentions
Parent self-report of their intentions to talk with their partner about how their household stores firearms (e.g., In the next 2 weeks, do you think that you will talk with your partner about how your household stores firearms? \[Response options: definitely no, probably no, probably yes, definitely yes\])
Baseline, Immediately post-intervention
Change in planning intentions
Parent self report of their intention to make a plan with theirpartner about storing firearms in their household more safely. (e.g., In the next 2 weeks, do you think that you will make a plan with your partner about storing firearms in your household more safely? By plan we mean having a discussion and deciding on something you are all expected to do. \[Response options: definitely no, probably no, probably yes, definitely yes\])
Baseline, Immediately post-intervention
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Decision making
Baseline, Immediately post-intervention
Study Arms (2)
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive a link to review an educational webpage (e.g., the AAP Firearm Storage Web Page)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive the newly developed prototype (e.g., the Family Safety Check In)
Interventions
Prototype decision aid to support within-family communication and decision making about firearm storage.
Educational web page that discusses safe firearm storage practices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parent or guardian of at least one child under the age of 18
- Lives with at least one other adult (e.g., romantic partner, parent)
- Lives in the United States
- Has at least one firearm in the home
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seattle Children's Research Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2022
First Posted
July 11, 2022
Study Start
July 15, 2022
Primary Completion
September 2, 2022
Study Completion
September 2, 2022
Last Updated
December 5, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share