A Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-controlled Clinical Trial Protocol to Validate the Safety and Efficacy of a Steep Pulse Therapy System for the Treatment of Liver Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled study. In this study, patients with liver cancer were selected as the research subjects, and the subjects were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group used the steep pulse treatment system produced by Zhejiang CuraWay Medical Technology Co., Ltd., and the control group used the RF Ablation System produced by Covidien llc. A total of 5 or 9 visits were planned in this study, namely the screening period (-14-0 days), the day of the first ablation, 2 ± 1 days after the first ablation, 30 ± 5 days after the first ablation, and after the first ablation 90±7 days, the day of secondary ablation, 2±1 days after secondary ablation, 30±5 days after secondary ablation, and 90±7 days after secondary ablation. The complete ablation rate at 30 ± 5 days after the first ablation was used as the main efficacy evaluation index to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the steep pulse therapy system produced by Zhejiang CuraWay Medical Technology Co., Ltd. for liver tumor ablation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedJuly 11, 2022
June 1, 2022
7 months
July 6, 2022
July 8, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
30-day complete ablation rate
Complete ablation rate
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Total complete ablation rate
90 days
Success rate of puncture
1 day
Equipment failure rate
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Steep Pulse Therapy System
EXPERIMENTALRF Ablation System
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The steep pulse therapy system is produced by Zhejiang CuraWay Medical Technology Co., Ltd. for liver tumor ablation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The age of the patient is between 18-80 years old, and the gender is not limited.
- For clinically diagnosed liver tumors, the diameter of a single tumor is less than or equal to 5cm; for multiple tumors: the number of tumors is not more than 3, and the largest tumor diameter is less than or equal to 3cm.
- Patient is able to take care of himself, and ECOG performance status is between 0 and 2 points.
- Liver function classification Child-Pugh A or B.
- Expected survival period ≥ 6 months.
- Patient is able to understand and comply with the trial protocol, and sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- It is less than 30 days after the end of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy.
- Within 3 months after ablation, patients need to continue treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, surgery, or other minimally invasive modalities.
- patients with severe infectious diseases such as bacteremia and toxemia.
- patients with uncorrectable coagulation dysfunction (PLT\<40xl09/L).
- patients with severe heart, brain, lung and other diseases, and patients with severe arrhythmia.
- patients with implanted artificial hearts, lungs, internal pulse regulators or wearable medical electronic devices such as electrocardiography.
- Patients with a history of epilepsy.
- Patients with acute myocardial infarction within 6 months.
- Pregnant and lactating women and those who plan to become pregnant within one year.
- Those who are allergic to ultrasound, CT or MRI contrast agents.
- Those who are contraindicated in general anesthesia.
- Those who have participated in clinical trials of any drug or medical device within the first 3 months of the group.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Universitylead
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospitalcollaborator
- West China Hospitalcollaborator
- Tianjin Third Central Hospitalcollaborator
- Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, China
Related Publications (6)
Meijerink MR, Ruarus AH, Vroomen LGPH, Puijk RS, Geboers B, Nieuwenhuizen S, van den Bemd BAT, Nielsen K, de Vries JJJ, van Lienden KP, Lissenberg-Witte BI, van den Tol MP, Scheffer HJ. Irreversible Electroporation to Treat Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases (COLDFIRE-2): A Phase II, Two-Center, Single-Arm Clinical Trial. Radiology. 2021 May;299(2):470-480. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203089. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
PMID: 33724066BACKGROUNDSu GL, Altayar O, O'Shea R, Shah R, Estfan B, Wenzell C, Sultan S, Falck-Ytter Y. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2022 Mar;162(3):920-934. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.276.
PMID: 35210014RESULTKudo M, Kawamura Y, Hasegawa K, Tateishi R, Kariyama K, Shiina S, Toyoda H, Imai Y, Hiraoka A, Ikeda M, Izumi N, Moriguchi M, Ogasawara S, Minami Y, Ueshima K, Murakami T, Miyayama S, Nakashima O, Yano H, Sakamoto M, Hatano E, Shimada M, Kokudo N, Mochida S, Takehara T. Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Japan: JSH Consensus Statements and Recommendations 2021 Update. Liver Cancer. 2021 Jun;10(3):181-223. doi: 10.1159/000514174. Epub 2021 May 19.
PMID: 34239808RESULTRuarus AH, Barabasch A, Catalano O, Leen E, Narayanan G, Nilsson A, Padia SA, Wiggermann P, Scheffer HJ, Meijerink MR. Irreversible Electroporation for Hepatic Tumors: Protocol Standardization Using the Modified Delphi Technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1765-1771.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
PMID: 32978054RESULTFreeman E, Cheung W, Ferdousi S, Kavnoudias H, Majeed A, Kemp W, Roberts SK. Irreversible electroporation versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single centre propensity-matched comparison. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug;56(8):942-947. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1930145. Epub 2021 May 30.
PMID: 34057003RESULTCheng C, Xu M, Pan J, Chen Q, Li K, Xu D, Jing X, Lu Q, Yang H, Zhao Q, Deng Z, Jiang T. A multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial protocol to evaluate the safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation compared with radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec 20;22(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03614-z.
PMID: 39707376DERIVED
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2022
First Posted
July 11, 2022
Study Start
March 16, 2022
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
July 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share