OGT-assisted Overlap Esophagojejunostomy Versus Traditional Overlap Method
OGT
Comparison Of Short-term Outcomes Between OGT-assisted Overlap Esophagojejunostomy And Traditional Overlap Method In Patients With Siewert III/II Esophagogastric Junction Cancer Or Gastric Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
344
1 country
12
Brief Summary
Abstract Background Our previous studies have shown OGT method significantly simplified overlap esophagojejunostomy with good short-term outcomes, and provided new perspectives for optimizing esophagojejunostomy. However, the safety and efficiency of OGT method still need evidence of randomized controlled trial. Methods: This trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open, and superiority trial. Three hundred and forty-four patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not accord with the exclusion criteria will be randomly divided into OGT group(n=172) and traditional group(n=172). The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate time of oesophagojejunostomy of OGT method compared with traditional method for Siewert III/II esophagogastric junction cancer and gastric cancer. The second purpose is to evaluate the success rate of inserting anvil fork into esophageal lumen at first attempt, attempts of inserting anvil fork into esophagus, early postoperative complications,recovery course and compare the postoperative hospital stay of the patients enrolled in this study. Discussion: This trial is the first prospective randomized two-arm controlled study to determine the safety and efficiency of OGT method compared with traditional overlap method. Through this trial, we hope to show that experienced surgeons can safely perform OGT-assisted overlap esophagojejunostomy for Siewert III/II esophagogastric junction cancer and gastric cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable gastric-cancer
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable gastric-cancer
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedMay 31, 2025
May 1, 2025
2.7 years
July 1, 2022
May 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time of oesophagojejunostomy
Time starts from making the entry hole for the anastomosis on the oesophagealstump, to the end of the common entry hole was closed using barbed threads.
1 Days
Study Arms (2)
Arm A
EXPERIMENTALIn OGT group,After the enterotomy was made, the nasogastric tube was pulled out 3 cm from the oesophagal lumen to connect with the OGT. Next, the anvil fork sleeved with OGT insert into the oesophageal mucosa canal by movement of the connection of fork -OGT -gastric tube. Then, the anaesthesiologist continued to pull back the nasogastric tube for 10 cm to ensure that the stapler would not clamp the nasogastric tube. After that, the surgeon began to fire the stapler to perform side-to-side esophagojejunostomy.
Arm B
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn overlap group, the oesophagojejunostomy was performed as reported by Inaba et al. After firing the stapler, two openings were converted into a single entry hole to create an end-to-side oesophagojejunostomy, and the entry hole was closed with full-thickness running suture using barbed sutures intracorporeally.
Interventions
In OGT group,the nasogastric tube was pulled out 3 cm from the oesophagal lumen to connect with the OGT. Meanwhile, the OGT was sleeved on anvil fork extracorporeally and the linear stapler was put into abdomen through trocar on the right side and then cartridge fork was inserted through jejunum opening towards the oral side of the lumen. Next, the anvil fork sleeved with OGT insert into the oesophageal mucosa canal by movement of the connection of fork -OGT -gastric tube.
In overlap group, the oesophagojejunostomy was performed as reported by Inaba et al.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-75 years;
- Primary lesion is pathologically diagnosed as gastric adenocarcinoma;
- Expected to live more than 1 year;
- Tumor located located in gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) involve esophagus no more than 2cm, or in the upper, upper to middle, or entire stomach, and intend to perform laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy
- No history of upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy);
- Preoperative performance status (ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) of 0 or 1;
- Preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) scoring: I-III;
- Without preoperative radiotherapy;
- Did not found metastasis preoperatively and intraoperatively;
- Sufficient organ functions;
- Written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding;
- Body temperature ≥ 38 °C before surgery or infectious disease with a systemic therapy indicated;
- Severe mental disease;
- Confirmed stage IV (AJCC 8th) during surgery
- Severe respiratory disease;
- Severe hepatic and renal dysfunction;
- Unstable angina pectoris or history of myocardial infarction within 6 months;
- History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months;
- Gastric cancer complications (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) that requiring emergency surgery;
- Performing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Fujian Medical University 2nd Affiliated Hoapital
Quanzhou, Fujian, China
Nanfang Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Sixth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
Shantou, Guangdong, China
Ganzhou City People Hospital
Ganzhou, Guangxi, China
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University
Hengyang, Hunan, 421001, China
The First Hospital Of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, China
The First Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001, China
The People's Hospital of Changzhi
Changzhi, Shanxi, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jiang Yu, Ph.D
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Quan Wang, Ph.D
The First Hospital of Jilin University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kai Ye, Ph.D
Fujian Medical University 2nd Affiliated Hoapital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chuanfa Fang, Ph.D
Ganzhou City People Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Feirang Zhang, Ph.D
First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wei Wang, Ph.D
The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wenqing Hu, Ph.D
The People's Hospital of Changzhi
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Junjiang Wang, Ph.D
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lei Lian, Ph.D
Sixth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jiaquan Zhu, Ph.D
First Hospital of China Medical University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yi Zhang, Ph.D
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shuai Xiao, Ph.D
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanhua University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2022
First Posted
July 11, 2022
Study Start
September 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 26, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
May 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- August, 2022-August, 2025
- Access Criteria
- All the accession for research will be admitted.
The IPD will be available for the investigation.