NCT05447858

Brief Summary

The aim of study; WorkCIT is to investigate whether managerial support in using systematic work environment evaluation and adjustment (SWEA) with/without additional 3 month web-based NSEs with four visits to a physiotherapist is effective in promoting reduced neck pain and disability among dental health care professionals (DHCP) with work-related neck pain (WRNP). The aim of the subgroup studies is to investigate biomarkers and tissue changes and the association with pain, work ability, and other outcomes before and after SWEA with or without NSEs. Furthermore, to investigate dental staff experiences with the interventions and their impact on work ability, health and their work situation, and investigate managers experience of SWEA with support from the Prehab guide and workshops. The hypothesis is that a combined effort with SWEA to promote the work situation together with NSEs will reduce neck pain intensity and improve work ability to a greater extent than the SWEA only. Methods and analysis: This is a prospective, longitudinal, randomised, controlled multi-centre trial with two parallel treatment arms and blinded investigators conducted according to a detailed protocol following the guidelines in the CONSORT checklist. A total of 240 DHCP with WRNP will be recruited. The main outcome is neck pain intensity. Secondary outcomes are work ability, function, health-related quality of life, work absenteeism, work-related factors, and work adjustments made. Cost-effectiveness will be studied from a societal perspective if significant differences appear between randomization groups regarding health-related quality of life and will in that case be reported in a separate paper. To improve diagnostics and help assess the effectiveness of intervention biochemical sub-group studies will be performed before and after intervention to investigate pain related biomarkers. Interviews with a sub-group of participants and managers will be performed regarding work-ability, work adjustments and experiences of interventions.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 28, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 7, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 9, 2023

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

June 28, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 8, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Neck painWorkplaceCounselingExerciseInternetCervical spine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Current neck pain intensity

    Current neck pain intensity at 15 months follow-up measured on the numeric rating scale (NRS) (0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain)

    Change in current neck pain intensity from baseline, to 3 month (after intervention) and until the 15 month follow-up (1 year after intervention ended).

Secondary Outcomes (26)

  • Work Ability Index (WAI) including Work Ability Scale (question no 1 in WAI)

    Change in work ability from baseline to 3 month and 15 month follow-up

  • Intensity of pain and bothersomeness

    Change from baseline to 3 month and 15 month follow-up

  • Frequency of pain, symptoms and medications

    Change from baseline to 3 month and 15 month follow-up

  • Neck specific function

    Change from baseline to 3 month and 15 month follow-up

  • Symptom satisfaction

    Change from baseline to 3 month and 15 month follow-up

  • +21 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Profession

    Baseline

  • Background data

    Baseline

  • Treatment outside the study

    Descripton baseline, 3 month, 15 month

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Managerial support in using systematic work environment evaluation and adjustment (SWEA)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Managerial support in using SWEA and the Prehab guide to enhance employees' work situation. Individual work adaptations are adaptations to everyone´s ability in the physical, organisational, and social work environment that aim to enable an employee with reduced ability to perform the normal work, continue working, or plan for a sustainable return to work. The Prehab guide contains a self-assessment test for the employee based on the requirements of the work and one's own ability that can be used in the dialogue with the manager. It also contains suggestions for activities to create a healthier workplace, such as discovering early signals of stress or pain, creating a caring workplace culture and boundaries, regular contact with an employee that is on sick-leave, clear and established safety procedures and routines for the work environmental work, routines for cooperation with other parties, and to learn from one's own and colleague's experiences in an open, permissive climate.

Other: Neck-specific exercise

Neck-specific exercise in addition to SWEA

EXPERIMENTAL

NSEs will be performed based on a well-structured framework of evidence-based exercises for facilitation of deep neck muscles, improved interaction between the different muscle layers of the neck, increased neck muscle endurance, and improved postural control \[15, 30\]. To ensure that the exercises are learned and performed correctly, the participant will meet with a physiotherapist a total of four times, once during weeks 2, 3, 4, and 7 (week 1=first visit for a clinical examination due to law) for instruction, guidance, and support. In addition to photos, videos, and text regarding the exercises, the digital support (web-based program at the support and treatment platform Inera via 1177 managed by the County Councils) also contains information about why it is important to exercise the neck muscles, factors that may cause neck pain, how relapses can be handled, ergonomic advice related to the neck, and an exercise diary.

Other: SWEA

Interventions

SWEAOTHER

Managers with one or several l staff experiencing WRNP will be educated in the Prehab guide. The manager should read and listen to all modules and a 1-h lecture recorded by the research team before participating in two workshops (4 h each), together with other managers and an experienced expert in work environmental health and rehabilitation. In the workshops, different themes will be discussed, such as physical, psychological, and organisational work-related health, prevention, and rehabilitation, how to lead problem-solving dialogue, how work-related adaptations can be performed related to WRNP, and questions about the Prehab guide. The Prehab guide will be used to deliver managerial support in the work with the Swedish Work Environment Authority's regulations regarding SWEA and the prevention of ill health, sick leave, and accidents, work adaptations, and workplace-oriented rehabilitation.

Neck-specific exercise in addition to SWEA

NSEs will be performed based on a well-structured framework of evidence-based exercises for facilitation of deep neck muscles, improved interaction between the different muscle layers of the neck, increased neck muscle endurance, and improved postural control .

Managerial support in using systematic work environment evaluation and adjustment (SWEA)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • For employees:
  • Self-reported WRNP lasting at least 4 weeks
  • Current neck pain ≥ 3 on the numeric rating scale (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), 0-10)
  • Working age, 18-65 y
  • Neck problems clinically verified by clinical examination to ensure study criteria are met
  • Answered the baseline questionnaire and attended the first intervention visit
  • Completed and signed informed consent, including approval, to contact their immediate supervisor regarding work adaptations.
  • For managers:
  • Being a head/ manager of a dental clinic.

You may not qualify if:

  • Red flags and illness/injury that are contraindicated for or hinder exercise or may be confounding factors for the results including:
  • Known pregnancy
  • Cannot understand/communicate in Swedish and would be unable to understand information about the study or answer questionnaires.
  • Increased tendency to bleed and use of blood thinners.
  • Cannot imagine refraining from anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during the 2 days prior to microdialysis
  • Hypersensitivity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck PainMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Anneli Peolsson, Prof., PhD

    Linkoeping University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomization will be handled by a person not involved in intervention or evaluation. Investigators/ assessors will be blinded for randomization. This is a prospective, longitudinal, randomised, controlled multi-centre trial with two parallel treatment arms and blinded investigators conducted according to a detailed protocol. A total of 240 employees with WRNP will be recruited. The main outcome is neck pain intensity. Secondary outcomes are work ability, function, health-related quality of life, work absenteeism, work-related factors, work adjustments made. Cost-effectiveness will be studied if significant differences appear between randomization groups regarding health-related quality of life and will in that case be reported in a separate paper.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2022

First Posted

July 7, 2022

Study Start

January 9, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

December 14, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The data is protected by the Swedish health secrets act and the European General Data Protection Regulation. Data will be presented on a group level without possibility for individual identification.