Added Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation
Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography-CT/MRI Fusion Guidance for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Inconspicuous, Small Liver Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
248
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)-CT/MRI fusion imaging substantially improved the visibility of small tumors that were inconspicuous on both US and US-CT/MRI fusion imaging, contributing to successful percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 6, 2022
CompletedJuly 6, 2022
June 1, 2022
2.3 years
June 17, 2022
June 30, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Local tumor progression rate
Evaluate local tumor progression by follow-up computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
12 months after the radiofrequency ablation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Technical success rate of radiofrequency ablation using contrast-enhanced US-CT/MRI fusion image
Immediately after radiofrequency ablation
Study Arms (1)
Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography-CT/MRI Fusion Guidance
EXPERIMENTALTo investigate whether CEUS-CT/MRI fusion imaging improved the visualization of small (≤ 3 cm) primary and secondary malignant liver tumors that were inconspicuous on B-mode US for percutaneous RFA.
Interventions
In brief, ablation was performed using a 200-W multichannel generator and a switching monopolar technique with separate clustered electrodes. Tumor targeting was done under the guidance of CEUS-CT/MRI FI, and the ablation procedure was monitored with US-FI. The ablation procedure was terminated when the operator expected to complete the ablation of the index tumor with a minimum 5-mm ablative margin on the US-FI images.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- inconspicuous or invisible index tumors for ablation on US
- tumor size ≤ 3 cm
- pathologic diagnosis of primary or secondary liver malignancy or imaging-based diagnosis of HCC according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines or viable HCC according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm
- consideration of curative-intent RFA
You may not qualify if:
- well-visible tumors (visibility score of 3 or 4) on the planning B-mode US
- the absence of available data from multiphase CT or MRI performed in the 3-month pre-procedure period
- poor quality registration of US-CT/MRI fusion imaging and RFA planned with palliative intent
- contraindications for the conventional RFA procedure at the authors' institution, which are uncontrollable coagulopathy (platelet count \< 50,000/μL or international standard ratio ≥ 1.6), a low level of cooperation, impracticality of sedation, portal vein thrombus, the tumor abutting the portal vein, or larger bile ducts than the segmental branches
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Jongno-gu, 03080, South Korea
Related Publications (11)
Lee DH, Lee JM. Recent Advances in the Image-Guided Tumor Ablation of Liver Malignancies: Radiofrequency Ablation with Multiple Electrodes, Real-Time Multimodality Fusion Imaging, and New Energy Sources. Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):545-559. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.545. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
PMID: 29962861BACKGROUNDAhmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, Breen DJ, Callstrom MR, Charboneau JW, Chen MH, Choi BI, de Baere T, Dodd GD 3rd, Dupuy DE, Gervais DA, Gianfelice D, Gillams AR, Lee FT Jr, Leen E, Lencioni R, Littrup PJ, Livraghi T, Lu DS, McGahan JP, Meloni MF, Nikolic B, Pereira PL, Liang P, Rhim H, Rose SC, Salem R, Sofocleous CT, Solomon SB, Soulen MC, Tanaka M, Vogl TJ, Wood BJ, Goldberg SN; International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation; Interventional Oncology Sans Frontieres Expert Panel; Technology Assessment Committee of the Society of Interventional Radiology; Standard of Practice Committee of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Nov;25(11):1691-705.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
PMID: 25442132BACKGROUNDFeng K, Ma KS. Value of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 28;20(20):5987-98. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.5987.
PMID: 24876721BACKGROUNDGao J, Wang SH, Ding XM, Sun WB, Li XL, Xin ZH, Ning CM, Guo SG. Radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma 3 cm or less as first-line treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5287-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5287.
PMID: 25954102BACKGROUNDLee DH, Kim JW, Lee JM, Kim JM, Lee MW, Rhim H, Hur YH, Suh KS. Laparoscopic Liver Resection versus Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Small Single Nodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Comparison of Treatment Outcomes. Liver Cancer. 2021 Feb;10(1):25-37. doi: 10.1159/000510909. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
PMID: 33708637BACKGROUNDLee MW, Kang D, Lim HK, Cho J, Sinn DH, Kang TW, Song KD, Rhim H, Cha DI, Lu DSK. Updated 10-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy for single hepatocellular carcinoma < 3 cm: emphasis on association of local tumor progression and overall survival. Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):2391-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06575-0. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
PMID: 31900708BACKGROUNDDietrich CF, Nolsoe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, Chammas MC, Chaubal N, Choi BI, Clevert DA, Cui X, Dong Y, D'Onofrio M, Fowlkes JB, Gilja OH, Huang P, Ignee A, Jenssen C, Kono Y, Kudo M, Lassau N, Lee WJ, Lee JY, Liang P, Lim A, Lyshchik A, Meloni MF, Correas JM, Minami Y, Moriyasu F, Nicolau C, Piscaglia F, Saftoiu A, Sidhu PS, Sporea I, Torzilli G, Xie X, Zheng R. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Oct;46(10):2579-2604. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
PMID: 32713788BACKGROUNDMauri G, Cova L, De Beni S, Ierace T, Tondolo T, Cerri A, Goldberg SN, Solbiati L. Real-time US-CT/MRI image fusion for guidance of thermal ablation of liver tumors undetectable with US: results in 295 cases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Feb;38(1):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0897-y. Epub 2014 May 8.
PMID: 24806953BACKGROUNDMinami Y, Kudo M. Review of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in ablation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec 7;17(45):4952-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i45.4952.
PMID: 22174544BACKGROUNDFrancica G, Meloni MF, Riccardi L, de Sio I, Terracciano F, Caturelli E, Iadevaia MD, Amoruso A, Roselli P, Chiang J, Scaglione M, Pompili M. Ablation treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in field practice of interventional ultrasound centers. A multicenter study. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Aug;105:96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 31.
PMID: 30017305BACKGROUNDLee Y, Yoon JH, Han S, Joo I, Lee JM. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography-CT/MRI fusion guidance for percutaneous ablation of inconspicuous, small liver tumors: improving feasibility and therapeutic outcome. Cancer Imaging. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00650-y.
PMID: 38172949DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeong Min Lee
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2022
First Posted
July 6, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 30, 2021
Study Completion
January 30, 2022
Last Updated
July 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share