NCT05445037

Brief Summary

Recently, there has been an increase in the popularity of minimally invasive surgical techniques, including arthroscopic surgeries for shoulder procedures. Interscalene block is currently the gold standard technique for these surgeries, combined or not with general anesthesia. The last, when used in patients positioned in a beach chair can lead to serious hemodynamic and cerebral changes in the patients. Continuous non-invasive monitoring of the patient's cardiac output can provide data for better hemodynamics management compared to standard monitoring. Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare hemodynamic changes (cardiac output, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation) and intraoperative cerebral oxygenation using peripheral cerebral saturation monitoring with continuous measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamic between two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia. The groups will be evaluated as follows: group 1 general anesthesia plus interscalene brachial plexus block and group 2 sedation plus interscalene brachial plexus block. Additionally, each group will be subdivided into two more groups, one with continuous hemodynamic monitoring and the other with standard hemodynamic monitoring, that is, a total of 4 groups in the study. The analyzed variables will include gender, age, ASA, medications in use, comorbidities. Furthermore, duration of procedure and in the anesthetic recovery room, blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, peripheral oxygen saturation, cerebral oxygen saturation, BIS value, cardiac index, etCO2 will be evaluated. Besides, length of hospital stay, delirium, behavioral status and postoperative complication will also be assessed.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 1, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 6, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 16, 2022

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 13, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes: cardiac output

    Compare cardiac output changes between continuous hemodynamic measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamics monitoring in two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia.

    Intraoperative

  • Compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes: blood pressure

    Compare blood pressure changes between continuous hemodynamic measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamics monitoring in two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia.

    Intraoperative

  • Compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes: heart rate

    Compare heart rate changes between continuous hemodynamic measurement of cardiac output or standard hemodynamics monitoring in two anesthetic techniques for shoulder surgery: interscalene block with sedation versus interscalene block with general anesthesia.

    Intraoperative

  • Evaluation of continuos hemodinamic monitoring non-invasive

    Verify the superiority of continuos hemodynamic non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output compared to standard hemodynamic monitoring regarding blood pressure

    Intraoperative

  • Evaluation of cerebral tissue saturation

    Compare changes in cerebral tissue saturation between groups

    Intraoperative

Study Arms (2)

Continuos Monitoring

EXPERIMENTAL

Continuos monitoring will be done with clearsight continuously assessing blood pressure, cardiac output and heart rate; NIRS electrode to access cerebral O2 saturation, peripheral O2 saturation, BIS value and axillary temperature.

Device: hemodynamic continuous monitoring

Standard monitoring

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard monitoring will be done with non-invasive

Device: Standard Monitoring

Interventions

Continuous monitoring will be done with clearsight continuously assessing blood pressure, cardiac output and heart rate; NIRS electrode to assess cerebral O2 saturation, peripheral O2 saturation, BIS value and axillary temperature.

Continuos Monitoring

Standard monitoring will be done with non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, NIRS electrode to access cerebral O2 saturation, peripheral O2 saturation, axillary temperature, BIS value. In addition, patients will use Clearsight, but the device will be blind to the anesthesiologist. Pressure monitoring will be every 5 min.

Standard monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery in a beach chair position.

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Blood dyscrasia
  • Refusal of the procedure
  • Infection at the puncture site
  • Allergy to the medication used
  • Previous cerebrovascular disease
  • History of orthostatic hypotension
  • Pulmonary disease
  • Chronic use of opioids
  • Performance of arthroscopic surgeries on both shoulders
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Not to sign an informed consent form.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, 04039901, Brazil

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • João M Silva Junior, PhD

    Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Lia AM Mota Lustosa, Doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The selected patients will be divided into two groups: group 1 general anesthesia + interscalene brachial plexus block and group 2 sedation + interscalene brachial plexus block. Each group will be divided into two groups, one with hemodynamic continuous monitoring and one with standard hemodynamic monitoring, totaling 4 groups in total in the study. Group 1A general anesthesia + interscalene brachial plexus block with continuous monitoring; group 1B general anesthesia + interscalene brachial plexus block with standard monitoring; group 2A sedation + interscalene brachial plexus block with continuous monitoring; group 2B sedation + interscalene brachial plexus block with standard monitoring.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2022

First Posted

July 6, 2022

Study Start

October 16, 2022

Primary Completion

April 1, 2024

Study Completion

July 1, 2024

Last Updated

March 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations