Effect of Chlorhexidine Solution in Preventing Peripheral Venous Catheter Associated-Infection
Effects of Chlorhexidine Solutions With Different Concentrations in Preventing Peripheral Venous Catheter-Associated Infections
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research aims to determine the most effective chlorhexidine concentration to be used in preventing peripheral venous catheter-associated infections. This research is a randomized controlled double-blinded experimental design. This research will conduct between July 2022-June 2023 with 96 intensive care patients at a state hospital in Turkey. The study sample consist of 96 new insertions of peripheral venous catheters.The study will carried out as a experimental trial to compare the efficacy 1%, 2% and 4% clorhexidine gluconate and 70% alcohol in preventing infections due to catheter administrations in patients. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria is randomized according to the randomization programme into three experimental groups and the control group. "Patient Information Form", "Catheter Information Form" and "Observational Form" will used to collect data.The vital findings and local infection findings of the patients that peripheral venous catheter is inserted will followed and recorded at pre-insertion and once every 24 hours for 96 hours. Culture analyze will performed from swab example taken from catheter entry location at pre-insertion,1st hour and pre removal of catheter.Data will analyzed in statistical program and p\<0,05 will considered as significant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 14, 2023
CompletedJanuary 31, 2024
January 1, 2024
9 months
June 28, 2022
January 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
H0
Different concentrations of chlorhexidine solutions have no effect on preventing peripheral venous catheter-related infections. 1%, 2% and 4% of chlorhexidine-gluconate solutions will compared with the 70% alcohol for skin antisepsis of PVC in ICU patients. Specimens will collected by swabbing the peripheral venous catheter entry site from the patients within before,1st and 96th hours of catheterization, respectively. The culture incubate at 37 C overnight on EMB and sheep blod agar plate. Then, the reproduction of microorganisms will identified in the culture. The presence of colonization of microorganisms in EMB blood agar indicates that gram-negative microorganism growths. The presence of colonization of microorganisms in the sheep blood agar indicates that gram-positive microorganisms growths. The absence of colonization of microorganisms in both of blood agars indicates that there is no growth.
one year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
H1
one year
Study Arms (4)
First group
EXPERIMENTAL1% chlorhexidine, n=24 patients.
Second group
EXPERIMENTAL2% chlorhexidine, n=24 patients.
Third group
EXPERIMENTAL4% chlorhexidine, n=24 patients.
Fourth group
OTHERcontrol group, 70% iso-propyl alcohol, n=24 patients.
Interventions
Chlorhexidine solution in different concentrations (1%, 2%, 4%) will applied to the 3 determined experimental groups, and 70% alcohol solution will applied to the control group. Its effects in preventing peripheral venous catheter-associated infection will compared.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be over 18 years of age
- Being inpatient in the Anesthesia and Reanimation Intensive Care Unit of the hospital where the research was conducted
- No history of infection,
- No history of catheter-related infection
- No history of immunological disease
- Being an indication for peripheral venous catheter intervention
You may not qualify if:
- Having a central venous catheter inserted
- Having a history of allergies
- Having a history of chronic skin disease
- Peripheral venous catheter is not suitable for intervention (scar tissue in the area to be operated, wound, burn, phlebitis, infiltration, extravasation, redness, discoloration, temperature increase, tenderness, edema, drainage, pain, swelling) and in the extremity on the side of the intervention history of mastectomy, fistula, stroke)
- Presence of surgical intervention.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
TR Ministry of Health Nazilli State Hospital
Aydin, Nazi̇lli̇, 09800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (12)
Araujo T, Rodriguez LP, Patel SA. Does my patient need a peripheral intravenous catheter? Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020 Jan 2;81(1):1-3. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2019.0151. Epub 2020 Jan 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 32003618BACKGROUNDMarsh N, Webster J, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Devices and dressings to secure peripheral venous catheters to prevent complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 12;2015(6):CD011070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011070.pub2.
PMID: 26068958BACKGROUNDAlexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Carr PJ, Frost SA, Inwood S, Higgins N, Lin F, Alberto L, Mermel L, Rickard CM; OMG Study Group. Use of Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes Worldwide. J Hosp Med. 2018 May 30;13(5). doi: 10.12788/jhm.3039.
PMID: 29813140BACKGROUNDWallis MC, McGrail M, Webster J, Marsh N, Gowardman J, Playford EG, Rickard CM. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;35(1):63-8. doi: 10.1086/674398. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
PMID: 24334800BACKGROUNDKeleekai NL, Schuster CA, Murray CL, King MA, Stahl BR, Labrozzi LJ, Gallucci S, LeClair MW, Glover KR. Improving Nurses' Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Knowledge, Confidence, and Skills Using a Simulation-Based Blended Learning Program: A Randomized Trial. Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):376-384. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000186.
PMID: 27504890BACKGROUNDMacias AE, Huertas M, de Leon SP, Munoz JM, Chavez AR, Sifuentes-Osornio J, Romero C, Bobadilla M. Contamination of intravenous fluids: a continuing cause of hospital bacteremia. Am J Infect Control. 2010 Apr;38(3):217-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.08.015. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
PMID: 20031270BACKGROUNDChoudhury MA, Sidjabat HE, Zowawi HM, Marsh PhD N, Larsen E, Runnegar PhD N, Paterson DL, McMillan DJ, Rickard CM. Skin colonization at peripheral intravenous catheter insertion sites increases the risk of catheter colonization and infection. Am J Infect Control. 2019 Dec;47(12):1484-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
PMID: 31331714BACKGROUNDNoorani A, Rabey N, Walsh SR, Davies RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery. Br J Surg. 2010 Nov;97(11):1614-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7214.
PMID: 20878942BACKGROUNDBilir A, Yelken B, Erkan A. Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial. J Res Med Sci. 2013 Jun;18(6):510-2.
PMID: 24250702BACKGROUNDYamamoto N, Kimura H, Misao H, Matsumoto H, Imafuku Y, Watanabe A, Mori H, Yoshida A, Miura S, Abe Y, Toba M, Suzuki H, Ogawa K, Kanemitsu K. Efficacy of 1.0% chlorhexidine-gluconate ethanol compared with 10% povidone-iodine for long-term central venous catheter care in hematology departments: a prospective study. Am J Infect Control. 2014 May;42(5):574-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.12.023. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
PMID: 24655901BACKGROUNDOhtake S, Takahashi H, Nakagawa M, Uchino Y, Miura K, Iriyama N, Nakayama T, Hatta Y, Takei M. One percent chlorhexidine-alcohol for preventing central venous catheter-related infection during intensive chemotherapy for patients with haematologic malignancies. J Infect Chemother. 2018 Jul;24(7):544-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
PMID: 29627326BACKGROUNDCapdevila JA, Guembe M, Barberan J, de Alarcon A, Bouza E, Farinas MC, Galvez J, Goenaga MA, Gutierrez F, Kestler M, Llinares P, Miro JM, Montejo M, Munoz P, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Sousa D, Cuenca J, Mestres CA; on behalf the SEICAV, SEMI, SEQ and SECTCV Societies. 2016 Expert consensus document on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of short-term peripheral venous catheter-related infections in adult. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2016 Aug;29(4):230-8. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
PMID: 27580009BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
NİHAL TAŞKIRAN, PhD
Aydin Adnan Menderes University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- A double-blind, experimental type of study.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2022
First Posted
July 1, 2022
Study Start
June 24, 2022
Primary Completion
April 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 14, 2023
Last Updated
January 31, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share