the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
Efficacy of the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance in Young Adult Class II Orthodontic Patients; A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
the objective of the current study is to compare the dentofacial effects of the mini-plate anchored Herbst appliance Versus the dentally anchored Twin force bite corrector Appliance in Young Adult Class II Orthodontic Patients with retruded mandible.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 1, 2022
June 1, 2022
1.5 years
June 27, 2022
June 29, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of changes in dentoskeletal cephalometric measurements between Herbst Group and TFBC group
lateral cephalometric radiograph was analysed by dolphin software to assess the following angular (in degree) and linear (in mellimeter) measurements : SNA - SNB - ANB - Y AXIS angle - facial angle - (co - A) - (co - gn) - ( upper 1 - SN) - (lower 1 - MP) - overjet - over bite - soft tissue convexity angle.
one year and four months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Amount of changes in dentoskeletal cephalometric measurements within each group separately
one year and four months
Study Arms (2)
Herbst Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR• Group I: Include ten young adult orthodontic patients who are treated by using fixed orthodontic appliances followed by the type IV Herbst appliance (mini plate anchored appliance). The age of patients will be (18-20y).
TFBC Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR• Group II: Include ten young adult orthodontic patients who are treated by using fixed orthodontic appliances followed by the Twin Force Bite Corrector appliance (dentally anchored appliance). The age of patients will be (18-20y).
Interventions
Herbst Group: 1. Two mini plates are chosen, the last hole in every plate is used to solder the ball housing of type IV Herbst appliance. 2. The two mini plates are placed bilateral at the mandibular symphysis and fixed by at least 3 screws, the surgical wound is sutured. 3. The surgical wound is left for 2 weeks for proper soft tissue healing, in the meantime separation in the arch, band placement on the first premolar and molar bilateral followed by impression for construction of the upper Herbst splint.
TFBC Group: 1. The patients will be treated by fixed orthodontic appliance with using series of orthodontic NiTi arch wires for levelling and alignment. 2. Installation of series of orthodontic stainless steel arch wires until 0.0019 x 0.0025 inch for both arches. 3. Installation of the Twin Force Bite Corrector appliance for 4 to 6 months. 4. Using of class ΙΙ intra-oral elastics for both sides for 2 to 3 months.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Skeletal class 2 malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion with increased overjet (SNA= 82±4, ANB=≥4°).
- Mandibular arch with minimum (up to 4mm) or no crowding.
- All permanent teeth are erupted (3rd molar not included).
- Good oral and general health.
- No systemic disease or regular medication that could interfere and/or affect orthodontic teeth movement.
- No previous orthodontic treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- \- 1. Patients with a blocked-out tooth that will not allow for placement of the bracket at the initial bonding appointment.
- \. Patients with untreated decay or any endodontic lesions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nasr city
Cairo, 11311, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahmoud M. Fathy Aboelmahasen, PHD
Lecturer of orthodontics - Faculty of dental medicine - Al-Azhar university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical professor of orthodontics - Faculty of dental medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2022
First Posted
July 1, 2022
Study Start
September 10, 2020
Primary Completion
March 8, 2022
Study Completion
April 15, 2022
Last Updated
July 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share