NCT05440526

Brief Summary

the objective of the current study is to compare the dentofacial effects of the mini-plate anchored Herbst appliance Versus the dentally anchored Twin force bite corrector Appliance in Young Adult Class II Orthodontic Patients with retruded mandible.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2020

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 8, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 15, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 27, 2022

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

July 1, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

June 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 29, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Amount of changes in dentoskeletal cephalometric measurements between Herbst Group and TFBC group

    lateral cephalometric radiograph was analysed by dolphin software to assess the following angular (in degree) and linear (in mellimeter) measurements : SNA - SNB - ANB - Y AXIS angle - facial angle - (co - A) - (co - gn) - ( upper 1 - SN) - (lower 1 - MP) - overjet - over bite - soft tissue convexity angle.

    one year and four months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Amount of changes in dentoskeletal cephalometric measurements within each group separately

    one year and four months

Study Arms (2)

Herbst Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

• Group I: Include ten young adult orthodontic patients who are treated by using fixed orthodontic appliances followed by the type IV Herbst appliance (mini plate anchored appliance). The age of patients will be (18-20y).

Procedure: Herbst Group

TFBC Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

• Group II: Include ten young adult orthodontic patients who are treated by using fixed orthodontic appliances followed by the Twin Force Bite Corrector appliance (dentally anchored appliance). The age of patients will be (18-20y).

Device: TFBC Group

Interventions

Herbst GroupPROCEDURE

Herbst Group: 1. Two mini plates are chosen, the last hole in every plate is used to solder the ball housing of type IV Herbst appliance. 2. The two mini plates are placed bilateral at the mandibular symphysis and fixed by at least 3 screws, the surgical wound is sutured. 3. The surgical wound is left for 2 weeks for proper soft tissue healing, in the meantime separation in the arch, band placement on the first premolar and molar bilateral followed by impression for construction of the upper Herbst splint.

Herbst Group

TFBC Group: 1. The patients will be treated by fixed orthodontic appliance with using series of orthodontic NiTi arch wires for levelling and alignment. 2. Installation of series of orthodontic stainless steel arch wires until 0.0019 x 0.0025 inch for both arches. 3. Installation of the Twin Force Bite Corrector appliance for 4 to 6 months. 4. Using of class ΙΙ intra-oral elastics for both sides for 2 to 3 months.

TFBC Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 20 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Skeletal class 2 malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion with increased overjet (SNA= 82±4, ANB=≥4°).
  • Mandibular arch with minimum (up to 4mm) or no crowding.
  • All permanent teeth are erupted (3rd molar not included).
  • Good oral and general health.
  • No systemic disease or regular medication that could interfere and/or affect orthodontic teeth movement.
  • No previous orthodontic treatment.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- 1. Patients with a blocked-out tooth that will not allow for placement of the bracket at the initial bonding appointment.
  • \. Patients with untreated decay or any endodontic lesions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nasr city

Cairo, 11311, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Overbite

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Malocclusion, Angle Class IIMalocclusionTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mahmoud M. Fathy Aboelmahasen, PHD

    Lecturer of orthodontics - Faculty of dental medicine - Al-Azhar university

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical professor of orthodontics - Faculty of dental medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2022

First Posted

July 1, 2022

Study Start

September 10, 2020

Primary Completion

March 8, 2022

Study Completion

April 15, 2022

Last Updated

July 1, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations