A Family-Based Alcohol Preventive Intervention for Latino Emerging Adults
LEA
1 other identifier
interventional
83
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the proposed study was to develop a family-based drinking prevention intervention for Latino emerging adults (EAs) and Latino parents of EAs. Although drinking rates for Latinos are lower than those for Whites in terms of the prevalence of alcohol use, the consequences of alcohol use (e.g., drunk driving, unplanned/unprotected sex, alcohol-related injuries) appear to be more severe for Latinos, especially those 18-23 years old. The investigators developed a brief (4 session) intervention for each of EAs and parents focused on identity development and parent support for EAs, respectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2022
CompletedJune 29, 2022
June 1, 2022
4.7 years
November 30, 2021
June 27, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Emerging Adult Self-Efficacy
The Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Self-Efficacy scale was designed to appraise Latino emerging adults' healthy identity formation and healthy behaviors. Participating emerging adults self-administered this online assessment twice during the study--at baseline, pre-intervention, and 3-4 months post-intervention. The scale includes 14 items (e.g., I feel confident that I can successfully tackle the challenges of becoming an adult; I draw on strengths from my family's cultural background to help me deal with the stress of becoming an adult; I use healthy activities to deal with stress; Mentors \[parents or other trusted adults\] are important in the life success of emerging adults). Answer choices include: 1-Strongly disagree; 2-Disagree; 3-Agree; 4-Strongly Agree. Higher scores indicate higher emerging adult self-efficacy. The Cronbach's alpha was .78. (Citation: Center for Equity Promotion. \[2019\]. Latino Emerging Adult Self-Efficacy scale. University of Oregon.)
3-4 months
Parent-Emerging Adult Relationship Quality
The Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Parent-Emerging Adult Relationship Quality scale was designed by the research team. Participating emerging adults self-administered this online computer-based survey twice during the study--at baseline and approximately 3-4 months later, after the completion of the intervention program. The scale includes 6 items (e.g., Even though my parent can be annoying, I know that she/he is my best supporter; Even when I think that my parent is wrong, I understand where she/he is coming from). Answer choices include: 0-Not at all true; 1-Not really true; 2-Somewhat true; 3-Very true. Higher scores equal higher quality relationships as reported by emerging adults. The Cronbach's alpha was .82. (Citation: Center for Equity Promotion. \[2019\]. Latino Emerging Adult Parent-Emerging Adult Relationship Quality scale. University of Oregon.)
3-4 months
Parent Trust in Emerging Adult Decision-Making
The Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Parent Trust in Emerging Adult Decision-Making scale was designed by the research team. Participating parents self-administered this online computer-based survey twice during the study--at baseline and approximately 3-4 months later, after the completion of the intervention program. The scale includes 6 items (e.g., I am confident that my emerging adult child will make the right choices in life; I'm afraid that my emerging adult child will not be able to figure out what to do in life; My emerging adult child knows what to do when s/he needs to make an important life decision). Answer choices include: 0-Not at all true; 1-Not really true; 2-Somewhat true; 3-Very true. Higher scores indicate higher parent-reported trust in emerging adult children's decision-making. The Cronbach's alpha was .77. (Citation: Center for Equity Promotion. \[2019\]. Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Parent Trust in Emerging Adult Decision-Making scale. University of Oregon.)
3-4 months
Parent support
The Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Parent Support scale was designed by the research team. Participating parents self-administered this online computer-based survey twice during the study--at baseline and approximately 3-4 months later, after the completion of the intervention program. The scale includes 8 items (e.g., Even if \[child's name\] doesn't listen to me one time, I still know that I can get through to him/her the next time; \[child's name\] comes to me and talks to me about important issues in his/her life; I generally know how to connect with or reach out to \[child's name\] when they need my support). Answer choices include: 1-Strongly disagree; 2-Disagree; 3-Agree; 4-Strongly Agree. Higher scores indicate higher parent support. The Cronbach's alpha was .82. (Citation: Center for Equity Promotion. \[2019\]. Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Parent Support scale. University of Oregon.)
3-4 months
Emerging adult alcohol consumption
Three items from the University of Michigan's Monitoring the Future survey were used to appraise alcohol use (Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Schulenberg, J. E., \& Miech, R. A. (2015). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2014: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-55.). Items include: 1. Have ever tried even a few sips of alcohol? Yes No (if no, skip to #3) 2. If YES: How old were you when you first tried at least a few sips of alcohol? \_\_\_\_\_ years old 3. During the last 3 months, what was the HIGHEST number of drinks that you drank in a single day?
3-4 months
Drinking-related risk behaviors
Twelve items from the Monitoring the Future survey were used (Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Schulenberg, J. E., \& Miech, R. A. (2015). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2014: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-55). Exemplar items include: During the last 3 months, about how many days did you drink until it affected your ability to make decisions?; How many times in the last 3 months did you use other drugs after you had been drinking?; and, In the past 3 months, how many times did you ride in a car when you knew the driver was drunk or high?
3-4 months
Drinking-related harm reduction behaviors
The Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Drinking-related Harm Reduction Behaviors scale was designed by the research team. Participating emerging adults self-administered this online survey twice during the study--at baseline and approximately 3-4 months later, after the completion of the intervention program. The scale includes 13 items (e.g., If one of my friends is really drunk, I make sure that person is safe; If I have been drinking too much I feel comfortable finding a ride home with a sober driver or finding a place to sleep; In my group of friends, if someone has been drinking too much we make sure that he/she doesn't drive). Answer choices include: 1-Strongly disagree; 2-Disagree; 3-Agree; 4-Strongly Agree. Higher scores indicate EAs practice more alcohol-related harm-reducing behaviors. The Cronbach's alpha was .93. (Citation: Center for Equity Promotion. \[2019\]. Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Drinking-related Harm Reduction Behaviors scale. University of Oregon.)
3-4 months
Emerging adult perceived stress
Emerging adult participants respond in an online survey to the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10; Cohen, S. and Williamson, G. \[1988\]. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan \& S. Oskamp \[Eds.\] The social psychology of health \[pp. 31-67\]. Sage Publications, Inc.). Answer choices range from Never = 0 to Very often = 4. Responses are summed with higher sum scores reflecting higher perceived stress. The Cronbach's alpha for emerging adults in this study was .82.
3-4 months
Parent perceived stress
Parent participants respond in an online survey to the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10; Cohen, S. and Williamson, G. \[1988\]. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan \& S. Oskamp \[Eds.\] The social psychology of health \[pp. 31-67\]. Sage Publications, Inc.). Answer choices range from Never = 0 to Very often = 4. Responses are summed with higher sum scores reflecting higher perceived stress.
3-4 months
Bicultural identity integration
Sixteen items from the Bicultural Identity Integration Scale (BIIS-2) were used to capture variation in emerging adults' experiences of acculturation. (Huynh, Q. L., Benet-MartÃnez, V., \& Nguyen, A. M. D. \[2018\]. Measuring variations in bicultural identity across US ethnic and generational groups: Development and validation of the Bicultural Identity Integration Scale-Version 2 \[BIIS-2\]. Psychological Assessment, 30\[12\], 1581.). Exemplar items include: I feel part of a combined culture that is a mixture of Hispanic/Latino and American; I find it difficult to combine Hispanic/Latino and American cultures; I do not blend my Hispanic/Latino and American cultures. Answer choices range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). The scale taps cultural blendedness versus compartmentalization and cultural harmony versus conflict, and final scores are averages.
3-4 months
Emerging adult future orientation
Ten items from the Steinberg et al. Future Orientation Scale were used (Steinberg L, Graham S, O'Brien L, Woolard J, Cauffman E, Banich M. \[2009\]. Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development. Jan-Feb;80\[1\]:28-44.) The 10 items include question numbers 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15 across 4 sub-scales including Planning Ahead, Time Perspective, Anticipation of Future Consequences, and Anticipation of Future Consequences. All items are scored left to right on a scale of 1-4. Reverse score items 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, and 14, so that higher scores indicate a stronger future orientation.
3-4 months
Parent hope for emerging adult child's future
This 12 item scale appraises parents' hopes for their emerging adult children's future. Answer options range from 0-Not at all true to 3-Very true. Exemplar items include: It's important to me that (my child) continues her/his education after high school; It's important to me that (my child) graduates from college; I know what (my child's) goals are for her/his future; and I help (my child) make plans and take steps towards her/his goals for the future. Citation: Center for Equity Promotion. \[2019\]. Latino Emerging Adult (LEA) Parent Hope for Emerging Adult Future scale. University of Oregon.)
3-4 months
American identity integration
Seven items were used from the American Identity Measure (Schwartz et al \[2012\]. The American Identity Measure: Development and validation across ethnic subgroup and immigrant generation. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 12\[2\], 93-128.). Exemplar items include: I am happy that I am an American; I have a strong sense of belonging to the United States. Answer choices range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Higher scores indicate higher American identity affirmation.
3-4 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Emerging adult acculturative stress
3-4 months
Parent acculturative stress
3-4 months
Study Arms (2)
EMERGE program
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: intervention or control. Intervention participants engaged in a 4 session program named the EMERGE program focused on identity development (emerging adults) or support for emerging adults (parents). Control participants received referrals to community agencies for behavioral and mental health support as needed.
Referral services as needed
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: intervention or control. Control participants received services as usual.
Interventions
The LEA program involves two components, one for emerging adults (aged 18-23 years old) focused on identity development linked to cultural and familial strengths, and a parent component focused on support for emerging adult children. Each session is 4 sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Emerging adult criteria:
- Between the ages of 18 and 23 years old upon recruitment
- Identify as Latina/o, Hispanic, Chicana/o, or have been born or descended from a parent or grandparent from Mexico or another nation in Central or South America or the Spanish-speaking Caribbean
- Intend to remain in the area for the four months following their recruitment into the study in order to participate in the intervention, if selected
- Parent criteria:
- Have a child between the ages of 18 and 23 years old
- Identify as Latina/o, Hispanic, Chicana/o, or have been born or descended from a parent from Mexico, or a nation in Central or South America or the Spanish-speaking Caribbean
- Speak and understand Spanish
You may not qualify if:
- Emerging adult criteria:
- EAs are not themselves a parent or stepparent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heather H McClure, PhD
University of Oregon
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Seth J Schwartz, PhD
University of Texas at Austin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Though most assessments were conducted by participants themselves online, in a few cases, study assessors conducted telephone interviews with parent participants. In these cases, the assessor was kept blind to the participant's study condition.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2021
First Posted
June 29, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 31, 2021
Study Completion
March 31, 2021
Last Updated
June 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be available by January 2022 and available indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers interested in accessing the data must share their contact information with PIs.
A de-identified data set is available to other researchers and can be accessed through contacting either study PI.