Effect of Segmentation Techniques (Manual Versus Semiautomatic) on the Accuracy of the Reconstructed Mandibular Condyle Using CBCT
CBCT
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Effect of Segmentation Techniques (Manual versus Semiautomatic) on the Accuracy of the Reconstructed Mandibular Condyle using CBCT
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 6, 2022
October 1, 2022
5 months
June 23, 2022
October 5, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Linear assessment of the condyles
Linear measurements will be calculated in millimeters by Built-in measuring tool (ruler) in the software + digital caliper on the dry mandibles
one month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Volumetric assessment of the condyles
one month
Study Arms (3)
Manual segmentation technique of CBCT images of the condyles.
EXPERIMENTALUsing the manual edition built in tool, first a brush of small size will be used to demarcate the outline of the condyle in the sagittal cuts. Then shading the demarcated condylar area with a brush of larger size in each slice. The outline of the condyle will be refined on all cuts. The software built in tool 'create surface' will be used to create the segmented 3D volume
Semiautomatic segmentation technique of CBCT images of the condyles.
EXPERIMENTALUsing the water shed built in tool, first a brush of small size will be used to demarcate the outline of the condyle by the 'background' option in all planes. Then using the 'foreground' option, a brush of larger size will be used to shade the condylar area. The software built in tool 'expand water shed' will be used to include the whole condyle. At last, 'create surface' option will be used to create the segmented 3D volume.
Actual physical measurements of the condyles on the dry mandibles
NO INTERVENTIONFor linear measurements, actual physical measurements will be done on the dry mandibular condyles, using digital caliper, as mentioned before. For volumetric measurements, water displacement technique will be used. The mandibular condyle will be immersed in a graduated beaker containing water till the level of the glued gutta percha. The volume of the displaced water will be measured and will represent the actual volume of the condyle
Interventions
CBCT scanning
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Intact dry human skulls and mandibles.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of fracture, pathological lesions, or skeletal deformities in the condylar area.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2022
First Posted
June 28, 2022
Study Start
July 1, 2022
Primary Completion
November 20, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 6, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10