The LISA (Lactoferrin InStead of Antibiotics/Antifungals) Feasibility Study
LISA
Is the Naturally Occurring Prebiotic Lactoferrin an Acceptable Alternative to Antibiotic/Antifungal Tablets for Women With Bacterial Vaginosis or Thrush?
1 other identifier
interventional
114
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Three-quarters of women have bacterial vaginosis (BV) or vaginal thrush/candida yeast infection at least once during their lifetime. Symptoms can include abnormal vaginal discharge, soreness, itching and an unpleasant smell. BV during pregnancy can make the baby come too early. In the UK over a million women suffer recurrent vaginal infections. These can affect their sexual relationships and quality of life, and may need repeated courses of treatment. But some women prefer not to keep taking antibiotics which can have side effects and encourage the growth of resistant superbugs. Lactoferrin is a prebiotic protein derived from cow's milk. Women also have naturally occurring lactoferrin in their vagina where it helps to prevent infections and encourage the growth of healthy bacteria. Recent research suggests lactoferrin may be an effective treatment for BV and thrush, but this needs to be confirmed. Aim To see if it is feasible to conduct a future trial to prove whether lactoferrin vaginal pessaries are an acceptable, effective and cost-effective alternative to antibiotic tablets for women with BV or thrush. Methods The investigators will recruit a total of 57 women with BV and 57 with thrush from two sexual health clinics and a general practice. Women will be asked to provide self-taken vaginal samples with a cotton bud, and to complete a confidential sexual-health questionnaire. Then the women will be divided into two groups. One group will be given lactoferrin vaginal pessaries to use every night for 3-weeks. The other group will be given antibiotic/antifungal tablets. All women will be asked to provide repeat vaginal samples at home and text us about any symptoms to see if the treatment works, if the infection comes back and if they would like antibiotics. After 3 and 12-weeks all women will be invited back for a check-up. Outcome measures:
- Acceptability and use of vaginal lactoferrin - from questionnaires, and interviews with 15-20 women
- Recruitment and follow-up rates
- Cost of lactoferrin treatment
- The percentage of women who report their symptoms have resolved after a week
- How quickly infections clear or recur - from analysis of samples Patient benefit: If this study leads to a trial showing vaginal lactoferrin is an acceptable and effective alternative to antibiotics, this could help relieve symptoms, prevent antimicrobial resistance and save NHS costs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2026
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 27, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
March 23, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.8 years
May 27, 2022
March 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The acceptability of vaginal lactoferrin treatment
This will be assessed from interviews with 15-20 participants
4-16 weeks after recruitment
Adherence to treatment
This will be assessed from participants' weekly count of remaining pessaries/tablets from questionnaires at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks
During the first 4 weeks of the study
Recruitment rate
Investigators will record the percentage of eligible women who agree to take part
Up to 15 months
Follow-up rate
Investigators will record the percentage of randomised women who are followed up after 12 weeks
Up to 20 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Acceptability of study procedures, and whether participants think other women would be willing to take part in a future randomised trial of lactoferrin versus oral antibiotics.
4-16 weeks after recruitment
Adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, vaginal irritation, abdominal pain, rashes, diarrhoea
Between recruitment and 12 week follow up
Recurrence or persistence of infection by 12 weeks
At 12 week follow up
Feasibility of obtaining data on healthcare use
Last 6 months of study
Percentage of participants who complete weekly symptom questionnaires for the first four weeks after recruitment.
During the 12 weeks after recruitment
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lactoferrin intervention group
EXPERIMENTALWomen will be given bovine lactoferrin 300mg vaginal pessaries to insert every evening for the first 21 days of the study \[25\].
Usual care control - standard oral antibiotics/antifungals
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl women with BV will be given oral metronidazole 400mg twice daily for five days (and routine advice about avoiding alcohol). Control women with candida will be given a fluconazole 150mg capsule to take orally the same day.
Interventions
Lactoferrin vaginal pessaries to insert nightly for 21 nights
Women with bacterial vaginosis will be given oral metronidazole and women with vaginal candida will be given oral fluconazole
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 16-49 years
- Having periods (apart from women with a Mirena IUCD or polycystic ovary syndrome)
- Ability to consent
- Clinical diagnosis of BV or thrush confirmed on Gram stain
- Willing to be randomised to vaginal lactoferrin pessaries or oral antibiotics/antifungals
- Agrees to provide vaginal samples at home and post/deliver them back to the research team.
- Agrees to avoid douching during the study (as this can flush out lactobacilli needed for a healthy microbiome).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Currently has chlamydia, gonorrhoea or trichomonas (as treatment for these would affect the results).
- Known allergy to metronidazole or azoles
- Post-menopausal (because of diagnostic confusion between atrophic vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- King's College Londoncollaborator
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trustlead
- Statens Serum Institutcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
St Thomas' NHS Trust
London, se1 7eh, United Kingdom
St George's, University of London
London, SW17 ORE, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pippa Oakeshott, MD
St George's, University of London
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This is an open label trial and there will be no blinding to treatment allocation of the participants or researchers. However, the analysis of samples (Gram stain and microbiome analysis) will be done blind to treatment allocation
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 27, 2022
First Posted
June 27, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share