Group Visits for High Risk Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)
Group Visits to Improve Technology Use, Glycemic Control, and Quality of Life in High Risk Children With Type 1 Diabetes
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators propose to conduct a pilot prospective cohort study to assess the impact of shared medical appointments (SMA) visits in underserved youth with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D). The trial will employ an enrollment visit, SMA visits every 3 months over a 12 month study period, followed by a 6-month observational period to assess feasibility and acceptability of SMA and the impact on glycemic control, self-management skills, and health related quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 22, 2025
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
3.4 years
March 18, 2022
July 7, 2025
December 18, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Percentage of Eligible Participants Who Agreed to Participate as Assessed by Tracking Those Who Were Approached to Participate and Those Who Agreed to Participate
Investigators will track all patients who screened eligible to participate in the study, as well as those who that were contacted to gauge interest in participating. Investigators will track the percent of people who agreed to participate from those that were approached, with the goal of \>60% of those reached/eligible to participate agreeing to enroll as a measure of feasibility.
12 months
Percentage of Participants With CGM Use, as Assessed by Tracking CGM Use Status From Enrollment to the End of the Study.
For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.
18 months
Frequency of SMA Sessions Attended, as Assessed by Tracking Study Visit Attendance.
For those who agree to enroll, investigators will document if participants attended or were absent from scheduled study visits. At the completion of the study, attendance will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% sessions attended among study participants as a measure of feasibility.
12 months
Perceived Satisfaction of SMA Intervention as Assessed by Semi-structured Interviews.
Thematic analysis of qualitative data will be conducted by two team members who independently review interview transcripts to generate initial codes. Initial codes will be discussed by the group to generate a list of second-cycle codes and each team member will then apply coding framework to all transcripts before identifying dominant themes. ATLAS.ti software will be used to organize and analyze qualitative data.
12 months
Perceived Utility of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)
Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention utility. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived utility as a measure of acceptability.
12 months
Perceived Benefit of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)
Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention benefit. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived benefit as a measure of acceptability.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months
Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months
Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months
Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
SMA visit intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALSMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients clinically diagnosed with T1D managed with insulin injections for at least 1 year
- Non-Hispanic Black or Latinx ethnicity
- Public healthcare insurance
- Male or female ages ≥ 8 and \< 12 years
- Poorly controlled T1D: one A1c value \> 8% in the preceding year
- Fluent in English as the Dexcom technology is currently available only in English
- Participation of the primary diabetes caregiver
You may not qualify if:
- Use of insulin pump therapy for diabetes management at time of enrollment
- Major illnesses other than T1D
- Significant cognitive limitations and major psychiatric disorders in the child or
- Concurrent use of any non-insulin diabetes medication to control blood glucose levels.
- Concurrent participation in any other clinical studies during study period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.collaborator
- Children's National Research Institutelead
- American Diabetes Associationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Children's National Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Related Publications (4)
Giani E, Snelgrove R, Volkening LK, Laffel LM. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Adherence in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: Associations With Biomedical and Psychosocial Variables. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):476-483. doi: 10.1177/1932296816676280. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
PMID: 27807014BACKGROUNDJeon, Jouhyun, et al.
BACKGROUNDHilliard ME, Levy W, Anderson BJ, Whitehouse AL, Commissariat PV, Harrington KR, Laffel LM, Miller KM, Van Name M, Tamborlane WV, DeSalvo DJ, DiMeglio LA. Benefits and Barriers of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Sep;21(9):493-498. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0142. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
PMID: 31287721BACKGROUNDGrundman JB, Majidi S, Perkins A, Streisand R, Monaghan M, Marks BE. Applying the use of shared medical appointments (SMAs) to improve continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use, glycemic control, and quality of life in marginalized youth with type 1 diabetes: Study protocol for a pilot prospective cohort study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jan 16;32:101067. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101067. eCollection 2023 Apr.
PMID: 36698741DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
limited sample size as enrollment was challenging and there was a limited subset of participants who completed the protocol
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jody Grundman
- Organization
- Children's National Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shideh Majidi, MD
Children's National Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2022
First Posted
June 24, 2022
Study Start
February 16, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Results First Posted
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share