NCT05431686

Brief Summary

The investigators propose to conduct a pilot prospective cohort study to assess the impact of shared medical appointments (SMA) visits in underserved youth with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D). The trial will employ an enrollment visit, SMA visits every 3 months over a 12 month study period, followed by a 6-month observational period to assess feasibility and acceptability of SMA and the impact on glycemic control, self-management skills, and health related quality of life.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 16, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2022

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 22, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

March 18, 2022

Results QC Date

July 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Percentage of Eligible Participants Who Agreed to Participate as Assessed by Tracking Those Who Were Approached to Participate and Those Who Agreed to Participate

    Investigators will track all patients who screened eligible to participate in the study, as well as those who that were contacted to gauge interest in participating. Investigators will track the percent of people who agreed to participate from those that were approached, with the goal of \>60% of those reached/eligible to participate agreeing to enroll as a measure of feasibility.

    12 months

  • Percentage of Participants With CGM Use, as Assessed by Tracking CGM Use Status From Enrollment to the End of the Study.

    For those who agree to enroll, investigators will classify participant's CGM use status at time of enrollment as either current CGM users, never CGM users, or those with CGM attrition. At the completion of the study, CGM use status will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% current CGM users among study participants as a measure of feasibility.

    18 months

  • Frequency of SMA Sessions Attended, as Assessed by Tracking Study Visit Attendance.

    For those who agree to enroll, investigators will document if participants attended or were absent from scheduled study visits. At the completion of the study, attendance will be assessed, with the goal of \>80% sessions attended among study participants as a measure of feasibility.

    12 months

  • Perceived Satisfaction of SMA Intervention as Assessed by Semi-structured Interviews.

    Thematic analysis of qualitative data will be conducted by two team members who independently review interview transcripts to generate initial codes. Initial codes will be discussed by the group to generate a list of second-cycle codes and each team member will then apply coding framework to all transcripts before identifying dominant themes. ATLAS.ti software will be used to organize and analyze qualitative data.

    12 months

  • Perceived Utility of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)

    Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention utility. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived utility as a measure of acceptability.

    12 months

  • Perceived Benefit of the SMA Intervention Content, as Measured by User Satisfaction Surveys Summary Statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation as Well as Percent Answering a Specific Likert Level)

    Youth and caregivers randomized to the SMA intervention will complete user satisfaction ratings at the end of the SMA intervention to evaluate intervention benefit. Investigators will report results of the satisfaction ratings, with the goal of \>80% reporting perceived benefit as a measure of acceptability.

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Percentage of Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)

    baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

  • Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Below Range (<70 mg/dL)

    baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

  • Continuous Glucose Monitor Time Above Range (>180 mg/dL)

    baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

  • Continuous Glucose Monitor Mean Sensor Glucose

    baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

  • Continuous Glucose Monitor Coefficient of Variation

    baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

SMA visit intervention arm

EXPERIMENTAL

SMAs will occur once every 3 months, and consist of 4-6 underserved youth with T1D and their primary diabetes caregiver

Behavioral: SMA visits

Interventions

SMA visitsBEHAVIORAL

SMA visit once every 3 months over a 12 month period

SMA visit intervention arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients clinically diagnosed with T1D managed with insulin injections for at least 1 year
  • Non-Hispanic Black or Latinx ethnicity
  • Public healthcare insurance
  • Male or female ages ≥ 8 and \< 12 years
  • Poorly controlled T1D: one A1c value \> 8% in the preceding year
  • Fluent in English as the Dexcom technology is currently available only in English
  • Participation of the primary diabetes caregiver

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of insulin pump therapy for diabetes management at time of enrollment
  • Major illnesses other than T1D
  • Significant cognitive limitations and major psychiatric disorders in the child or
  • Concurrent use of any non-insulin diabetes medication to control blood glucose levels.
  • Concurrent participation in any other clinical studies during study period

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Children's National Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Giani E, Snelgrove R, Volkening LK, Laffel LM. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Adherence in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes: Associations With Biomedical and Psychosocial Variables. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):476-483. doi: 10.1177/1932296816676280. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

    PMID: 27807014BACKGROUND
  • Jeon, Jouhyun, et al.

    BACKGROUND
  • Hilliard ME, Levy W, Anderson BJ, Whitehouse AL, Commissariat PV, Harrington KR, Laffel LM, Miller KM, Van Name M, Tamborlane WV, DeSalvo DJ, DiMeglio LA. Benefits and Barriers of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Sep;21(9):493-498. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0142. Epub 2019 Jul 9.

    PMID: 31287721BACKGROUND
  • Grundman JB, Majidi S, Perkins A, Streisand R, Monaghan M, Marks BE. Applying the use of shared medical appointments (SMAs) to improve continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use, glycemic control, and quality of life in marginalized youth with type 1 diabetes: Study protocol for a pilot prospective cohort study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jan 16;32:101067. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101067. eCollection 2023 Apr.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

limited sample size as enrollment was challenging and there was a limited subset of participants who completed the protocol

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jody Grundman
Organization
Children's National Hospital

Study Officials

  • Shideh Majidi, MD

    Children's National Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The study will include the intervention group participating in the SMA visits (n=20)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2022

First Posted

June 24, 2022

Study Start

February 16, 2022

Primary Completion

July 1, 2025

Study Completion

July 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Results First Posted

December 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations