Efficacy of a Sequential Treatment Strategy in Rheumatoid Arthritis
SEQUENS-RA
1 other identifier
interventional
220
2 countries
17
Brief Summary
In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the consensual 1st line conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) of RA is methotrexate (MTX). In case of contra-indication or intolerance to MTX, leflunomide is an alternative. If the treatment target is not achieved with csDMARD strategy, addition of a biological DMARD (TNF inhibitors, anti-Interleukin 6 (anti-IL6)), abatacept, or rituximab) or a targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD (JAK inhibitors) is considered. Current practice is to start a bDMARD (biologic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs) and especially TNF inhibitors (etanercept or monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies) with the benefit of hindsight. However, abatacept and TNF inhibitors have demonstrated similar efficacy in patients with insufficient response to csDMARD (AMPLE trial). Although abatacept has shown a very good tolerance profile that might be superior to other bDMARDs rheumatologists might be reluctant to use it as a first line bDMARD as there is a belief of a slower efficacy compared to other bDMARDs or JAK inhibitors. Indeed, in real world study, compared to TNF inhibitors it seems that discontinuation of abatacept is more related to lack of effectiveness than safety issues. Investigators have hypothesized that first rapidly controlling the inflammation phase, using TNF inhibitors followed by abatacept to induce an immunological remission would optimize response and tolerance of ACPA positive patients with RA. To demonstrate our hypothesis, the investigaors propose a randomized controlled trial with one arm receiving an induction therapy for 12 weeks with a TNF inhibitor followed by a cell-targeted bDMARD (abatacept) and the other arm, receiving TNF inhibitors.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Nov 2022
Longer than P75 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 28, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2027
October 3, 2025
March 1, 2025
3.9 years
June 16, 2022
September 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of patients in remission
Percentage of patients in remission defined by DAS28-CRP\<2.6 score during the 36 weeks following randomization. Disease Activity Score-28 with C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) describes severity of rheumatoid arthritis using clinical and laboratory data, specifically CRP. It includes 4 variables (number of painful joints out of 28 joints, number of swollen joints out of 28 joints, global assessment of the disease by the patient on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), markers of inflammation : CRP) A DAS28-CRP score \> 5.1 means high disease activity, DAS28-CRP \< or = 3.2 indicates low disease activity, a DAS28-CRP \< 2.6 indicates disease remission.
36 weeks following randomization
Secondary Outcomes (38)
percentage of patients in remission at 12 weeks after randomization (DAS28-ESR)
At 24 weeks visit (corresponding to 12 weeks after randomization)
percentage of patients in remission at 12 weeks after randomization (CDAI)
At 24 weeks visit (corresponding to 12 weeks after randomization)
percentage of patients in remission at 12 weeks after randomization (SDAI)
At 24 weeks visit (corresponding to 12 weeks after randomization)
percentage of patients in remission at 12 weeks after randomization (Boolean)
At 24 weeks visit (corresponding to 12 weeks after randomization)
Percentage of patients in remission at 24 weeks after randomization (DAS28-ESR)
At 36 weeks visit (corresponding to 24 weeks after randomization)
- +33 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALAll included patients will receive TNF inhibitors subcutaneous for 12 weeks. In the experimental arm, a therapeutic sequential strategy will be proposed from W12 visit. At 12 weeks (W12), patients who have at least a moderate EULAR response (delta DAS28-CRP between W0 and W12\>0.6 and DAS28-CRP≤5.1 at W12) will be randomized with a 1:1 ratio in the sequential strategy arm or the control arm. In the sequential strategy (experimental) arm, the 88 randomized RA patients will be switched to abatacept subcutaneous for 36 weeks.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll included patients will receive TNF inhibitors subcutaneous for 12 weeks. In the control group, the 88 randomized RA patients will be treated with TNF inhibitor subcutaneous for another 36 weeks (from W12 visit). In case of insufficient response to a first TNF inhibitor at 24 or 36 weeks, a second TNF inhibitor will be proposed.
Interventions
The experimental strategy will evaluate abatacept 125 mg/week following 12 weeks of anti-TNF prescribed in usual care. Concomitant treatment with stable doses of csDMARD, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesic agents, glucocorticoids (≤10 mg of prednisone or the equivalent per day), or a combination of these drugs will be permitted. Patients will continue to take methotrexate or leflunomide for the duration of the study.
In the control group, the 88 randomized RA patients will be treated with TNF inhibitor subcutaneous for 36 weeks. In case of insufficient response to a first TNF inhibitor at 24 or 36 weeks, a second TNF inhibitor will be proposed.
All included patients will receive TNF inhibitors subcutaneous for 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged between 18 or above
- Rheumatoid arthritis according to ACR-EULAR 2010 (American College of Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism)
- ACPA positive
- Under methotrexate or leflunomide treatment for at least 3 months
- DAS28-CRP\>3.2 under methotrexate or leflunomide calculated with CRP dated less than 7 days from baseline
- Escape under synthetic background treatment defined by an elevation of C-reactive protein (CRP) (CRP\> 5mg/L ) or Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (for men: \> age in years/2 ; for women: \> age (+10) /2)) within the last 6 months before baseline
- Targeted DMARDs (biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs) naïve
- Indication for a TNF inhibitor
You may not qualify if:
- Subject unable to read or/and write
- Planned longer stay outside the region that prevents compliance with the visit plan
- Subject unable to sign informed consent form
- Subject not covered by public health insurance
- Dementia
- Fibromyalgia
- Contra-indications to TNF inhibitor and/or Abatacept
- Absence of tuberculosis screening in the previous 3 months before baseline
- Patient with untreated active tuberculosis
- Patient who cannot be followed during 48 weeks
- Drug addiction, addiction to alcohol
- Protected populations according to the French Public Health Code Articles L1121-5,6,8 (For example, pregnant, parturient or lactating women, prisoners, adults under guardianship or otherwise unable to consent).
- Women of child bearing potential, unless they are using an effective method of birth control
- Patient under law protection
- Prisoners
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier
Montpellier, France, 34295, France
CHU Bordeaux groupe Pellegrin
Bordeaux, France
CHU de Brest La Cavale Blanche
Brest, France
Centre Hospitalier de Cahors
Cahors, France
CHD Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, France
CH du Mans
Le Mans, France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, France
CHU de Nice
Nice, France
CHU de Nîmes Carémeau
Nîmes, France
CHR Orléans Nouvel hôpital d'Orléans
Orléans, France
APHP Bicêtre
Paris, France
APHP Cochin
Paris, France
APHP La Pitié Salpetrière
Paris, France
CHU de Strasbourg Hautepierre
Strasbourg, France
Chu Purpan
Toulouse, France
CHU de Tours - Hopital Trousseau
Tours, France
Centre hospitalier Princesse Grace
Monaco, Monaco
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jacques MOREL, MD-PhD
UF of Montpellier
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2022
First Posted
June 23, 2022
Study Start
November 28, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03