NCT05426785

Brief Summary

To compare Treatment Group (settings of Early Multiple ATP) and Control Group (settings of extended detection time for the conventional ATP) in Japanese patients, and confirm their safety and efficacy

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
398

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
20mo left

Started May 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress64%
May 2023Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2022

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 22, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2023

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 10, 2027

Expected
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

June 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 24, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

ICDshockAntitachycardiac Pacing(ATP)Ventricular Tachycardia(VT)Ventricular Fibrillation(VF)Ventricular arrhythmias(VA)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time to first shock by Kaplan-Meier approach

    During the study duration(42 months: the enrollment period is 24 months plus the follow up period is 18 months from the Last Patient In(LPI)), to confirm that Treatment Group is the non-inferiority to the Control Group in terms of the time from randomized prescriptive settings to first shock with ICD device treatment, by Kaplan-Meier approach. The time frame of event evaluation is from a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months, since the study duration for each subject will differ according to the timing of enrollment.

    From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Success rate of the ATP

    From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months

  • Duration until the end of the episode

    From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months

  • Cardiac mortality

    From a minimum of 18 months to a maximum of 42 months

Study Arms (2)

Treatment Group(Early Multiple ATP Group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Set to perform multiple ATP early

Device: 1:1 ratio for Treatment Group and Control Group

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Set the extended detection time for the conventional ATP (Refer to the settings of "Delayed Therapy-arm C" in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) study)

Device: 1:1 ratio for Treatment Group and Control Group

Interventions

Randomization also will be performed at latest 10 days after ICD implantation, and the specified device programming settings for the allocated group will be set after successful implantation of the investigational devices.

Control GroupTreatment Group(Early Multiple ATP Group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient has an indication for ICD according to the The Japanese Circulation Society (JCS )/ Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS) 2021 Guideline Focused Update on Non-Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias
  • Patient is either planned for de novo ICD implantation or is already implanted with an investigational ICD for 10 days or less.
  • Patient can be treated with ATP therapy for both VT and VF zone
  • Patient is willing and able to use the CardioMessenger and accepts the Home Monitoring concept
  • Patient is willing to visit the hospital in accordance with physician's instruction
  • Patient is able to understand the nature of the study and to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient planned for implantation with or already implanted with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D) device
  • A patient who is confirmed to have received ICD therapy
  • A patient who is diagnosed as Idiopathic VF (e.g. Brugada syndrome, Long QT Syndrome, other IVF)
  • Age \< 18 years
  • A patient who has impaired mental status
  • Life expectancy less than 18 months
  • Participation in another interventional clinical investigation
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kokura Memorial Hospital

Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, 8028555, Japan

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Schuger C, Daubert JP, Zareba W, Rosero S, Yong P, McNitt S, Kutyifa V. Reassessing the role of antitachycardia pacing in fast ventricular arrhythmias in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: Results from MADIT-RIT. Heart Rhythm. 2021 Mar;18(3):399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

  • Arenal A, Proclemer A, Kloppe A, Lunati M, Martinez Ferrer JB, Hersi A, Gulaj M, Wijffels MC, Santi E, Manotta L, Mangoni L, Gasparini M. Different impact of long-detection interval and anti-tachycardia pacing in reducing unnecessary shocks: data from the ADVANCE III trial. Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1719-1725. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw032. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

  • Sterns LD, Meine M, Kurita T, Meijer A, Auricchio A, Ando K, Leng CT, Okumura K, Sapp JL, Brown ML, Lexcen DR, Gerritse B, Schloss EJ. Extended detection time to reduce shocks is safe in secondary prevention patients: The secondary prevention substudy of PainFree SST. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jul;13(7):1489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

  • Joung B, Lexcen DR, Ching CK, Silver MT, Piccini JP, Sterns LD, Rabinovich R, Pickett RA, Liu S, Brown ML, Cheng A. Additional antitachycardia pacing programming strategies further reduce unnecessary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.027. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

  • Yokoshiki H, Shimizu A, Mitsuhashi T, Ishibashi K, Kabutoya T, Yoshiga Y, Kohno R, Abe H, Nogami A; Members of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Committee of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. Trends in the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy device in advancing age: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database. J Arrhythm. 2020 Jun 8;36(4):737-745. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12377. eCollection 2020 Aug.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ShockTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Fibrillation

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsTachycardiaArrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiac Conduction System Disease

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Dr. Kenji Ando

    Kokura Memorial Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 1:1 ratio
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2022

First Posted

June 22, 2022

Study Start

May 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 10, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The study is the domestic multicenter clinical study, and the Publication Steering Committee(PSC) consisting of researchers may perform the analysis in accordance with the decision by PSC after first publication.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
Data will be available after 6 months of Lst Patient Out (LPO)
Access Criteria
Following Sponsor'sStandard Operating Procedures ()

Locations