Safety of Use of Pandora for Patients Suffering From Gonarthrosis
PANDORA1
Prospective, Multicenter, Open Study Evaluating the Short-term Safety of Use of Pandora Administered in the Form of 1 Intra-articular Injection of Happyone or 3 Intra-articular Injections of Happysoft in Patients Suffering From Gonarthrosis
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The knee osteoarthritis is a frequent degenerative condition that mainly affects subjects over 60, population often weakened by numerous comorbidities and concomitant treatments, justifying the development of new therapies. The viscosupplementation is a symptomatic treatment for knee osteoarthritis ; the objective of this intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid is to reduce knee pain and improve mobility. In practice, there are two protocols to administer viscosupplementation : in a single injection or in three injections performed weekly. The present clinical investigation has the objective to evaluate the safety of use of Pandora in a single injection or in three injections performed weekly.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Jun 2022
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 14, 2023
CompletedJune 22, 2023
June 1, 2023
7 months
June 2, 2022
June 20, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of adverse event attributable to the investigational Medical Device during the week following each injection.
Adverse events will be collected at : * Day 8 for Happyone arm (single injection) ; * Days 8, 15 and 22 for Happysoft arm (three injections).
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of adverse events during the month following the first injection for immediate and delayed local tolerance evaluation.
1 month
Patient self-assesment of the overall tolerance of the treatment based on a 5-point scale, from "Very bad" to "Very good".
1 month
Variation over time of the WOMAC score, between time of injection and end point, and the WOMAC subscores A (pain) and C (function). The WOMAC-Questionnaire is based on a 11 points scale, from 0 = None to 10 = Extreme.
6 months
Patient self-assesment of the effectiveness of the treatment based on a 11 points numeric scale, from 0 = None to 10 = Total.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Medical Device : Happyone
EXPERIMENTALHyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid ; 4.8 ml will be injected in one time
Medical Device : Happysoft
EXPERIMENTALHyaluronic acid associated with tranexamic acid ; 2.2 ml will be injected in three times (one injection per week)
Interventions
Both groups will receive their first injection after a selection visit ; first injection will be planned between 7 days to 30 days after to confirm the enrollment. The injection will be performed at Day 1.
Both groups will receive their first injection after a selection visit ; first injection will be planned between 7 days to 30 days after to confirm the enrollment. The injections will be performed at Days 1, 8 and 15.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient aged between 35 and 85 years.
- Body mass index (BMI) \< 30 kg.m\^2.
- Medial or lateral femoro-tibial knee osteoarthritis, diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, radiological stage 2 and 3 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence criteria modified by Felson on an X-ray, of the knee in extension, less than 12 months old.
- Knee osteoarthritis responsible for walking pain in the target knee, assessed between 4 and 8 inclusive on an 11 points numerical scale (0 = none to 10 = extreme).
- Ambulatory patient able to walk 50 meters without a cane, crutch or walker.
- Patient able to read, understand, sign and date the patient information sheet.
- Patient agreeing to follow-up study visits.
- Patient affiliated to the health social security system.
- Patient requiring viscosupplementation according to the investigator.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient presenting knee osteoarthritis without impingement joint space narrowing of the femoro-tibial compartment (modified Kellgren stage 0-1) or with complete impingement joint space narrowing on the knee weight-bearing radiograph in extension (modified Kellgren stage 4).
- Walking pain in the target knee, rated less than 4 or more than 8 on an 11-point numerical scale (0 = none to 10 = extreme).
- Patient with a flare of osteoarthritis of the target or contralateral knee attested by KOFUS criteria ≥ 7.
- Patients with a skin condition or a wound next to or near the injection site.
- Patients refusing to discontinue treatment with NSAIDs or cox-2 inhibitors during the follow-up period.
- Patient receiving treatment with level III analgesics (strong opioids).
- Patient with hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or tranexamic acid.
- Patient with a history of seizures.
- Patient with Fibromyalgia.
- Patient with an active neurological or vascular musculoskeletal disorder (such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis or any other autoimmune disease, Paget's disease, gout, coxopathy, tendinopathy of the lower limb, sciatic or crural radiculalgia) that could interfere with the measurement of the effectiveness of the treatment of the knee evaluated.
- Patient with hemostasis disorders, venous or lymphatic stenosis of the lower limbs, history of thromboembolic disease - phlebitis or pulmonary embolism - or a high risk of thromboembolism.
- Patients with an evolving general cardiac, digestive, endocrine, haematological or broncho-pulmonary condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would be likely to disrupt regular monitoring and/or interfere with the measurement of treatment efficacy .
- Breastfeeding patient, pregnant or wishing to be during the 6 months of the study.
- Patient unable to give personal consent.
- Patient with renal insufficiency.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, HNFC
Belfort, France
Groupe Hospitalier de la Région Mulhouse Sud-Alsace, GHRMSA
Mulhouse, France
Related Publications (8)
Sellam J, Courties A, Eymard F, Ferrero S, Latourte A, Ornetti P, Bannwarth B, Baumann L, Berenbaum F, Chevalier X, Ea HK, Fabre MC, Forestier R, Grange L, Lellouche H, Maillet J, Mainard D, Perrot S, Rannou F, Rat AC, Roux CH, Senbel E, Richette P; French Society of Rheumatology. Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology on pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2020 Dec;87(6):548-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
PMID: 32931933BACKGROUNDBalazs EA. Viscosupplementation for treatment of osteoarthritis: from initial discovery to current status and results. Surg Technol Int. 2004;12:278-89.
PMID: 15455338BACKGROUNDConcoff A, Sancheti P, Niazi F, Shaw P, Rosen J. The efficacy of multiple versus single hyaluronic acid injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1897-2.
PMID: 29268731BACKGROUNDDiracoglu D, Tuncay TB, Sahbaz T, Aksoy C. Single versus multiple dose hyaluronic acid: Comparison of the results. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):881-886. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160714.
PMID: 27257981BACKGROUNDBhadra AK, Altman R, Dasa V, Myrick K, Rosen J, Vad V, Vitanzo P Jr, Bruno M, Kleiner H, Just C. Appropriate Use Criteria for Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in the United States. Cartilage. 2017 Jul;8(3):234-254. doi: 10.1177/1947603516662503. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
PMID: 28618868BACKGROUNDLi J, Liu R, Rai S, Ze R, Tang X, Hong P. Intra-articular vs. intravenous administration: a meta-analysis of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Dec 2;15(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02119-1.
PMID: 33267906BACKGROUNDNg W, Jerath A, Wasowicz M. Tranexamic acid: a clinical review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(4):339-50. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0011. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
PMID: 25797505BACKGROUNDJules-Elysee KM, Tseng A, Sculco TP, Baaklini LR, McLawhorn AS, Pickard AJ, Qin W, Cross JR, Su EP, Fields KG, Mayman DJ. Comparison of Topical and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Study of Effects on Tranexamic Acid Levels and Thrombogenic and Inflammatory Marker Levels. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Dec 4;101(23):2120-2128. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00258.
PMID: 31800425BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Charles Balblanc, MD
Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, HNFC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2022
First Posted
June 10, 2022
Study Start
June 8, 2022
Primary Completion
January 18, 2023
Study Completion
June 14, 2023
Last Updated
June 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share