NCT05414110

Brief Summary

Effects of APRV on right ventricular function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome by transthoracic echocardiography

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 3, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 10, 2022

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 10, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 7, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Right ventricular area fractional change (RV FAC)

    Right ventricular area fractional change (RV FAC)is a simple and repeatable ultrasound method for evaluating RV function. Methods: The RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and RV end-systolic area (RVESA) were measured on the apical four-chamber section by two-dimensional ultrasound. RV FAC=(RVEDA- RVESA)/RVEDA\*100%.

    RV FAC monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation

  • Tricuspid annular systolic displacement(TAPSE)

    TAPSE:TAPSE is one of the most effective ultrasound methods for evaluating right ventricular function.Measurement method: TAPSE was measured on the four-chamber section of the apex of the heart by M-mode ultrasound. the sampling line was placed at the side wall of the tricuspid valve ring, parallel to the free wall of the right ventricle as far as possible, and the displacement of the tricuspid valve ring was measured from the end of diastole to the end of systole.

    TAPSE monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation

  • Tricuspid annular systolic S' velocity (TS')

    TS' is an objective and accurate ultrasound technique for evaluating right ventricular function.Measurement method:The sample volume was applied to the free wall of the RV and the peak velocity of tricuspid annulus motion was measured in the four-chamber section of the apex by tissue doppler imaging (TDI).

    TS' monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation

  • Right ventricular end-diastolic area/left ventricular end-diastolic area (RVEDA/LVEDA)

    RVEDA/LVEDA a simple and repeatable ultrasound method for evaluating dynamics changes of RV function.Methods: The RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA) and left ventricular(LV) end-systolic area (LVEDA) were measured on the apical four-chamber section by two-dimensional ultrasound.

    RVEDA/LVEDA monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation

  • Pulmonary circulatory resistance (PVR)

    Increased PVR can lead to deterioration of RV function.Pulse Doppler imaging (PWD) was used to obtain the pulmonary artery flow spectrum from the pulmonic valve on the short axial section of the parasternal great vessels.

    PVR monitoring was performed 1 day after APRV mechanical ventilation

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Heart rate (HR)

    HR monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended

  • Systolic blood pressure (SBP)

    SBP monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended

  • Mean arterial pressure (MAP)

    MAP monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended

  • cardiac output (CO)

    CO monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound

  • Stroke volume (SV)

    SV monitoring was performed before APRV mechanical ventilation and 6 hours, 12 hours, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after APRV mechanical ventilation, and 24 hours after APRV ended by ultrasound

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Include as many eligible study populations as possible by study protocol

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who meet the 2012 Berlin ARDS diagnostic criteria and undergo invasive mechanical ventilation
  • PEEP≥5cmH2O, oxygenation index≤200mmHg
  • Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation time \<48h
  • Age ≥18 years old and ≤80 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • Aged less than 18 years old or older than 80 years old
  • Obese patients with BMI≥35kg/m2;
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • The expected time of invasive mechanical ventilation is expected to be less than 48h
  • Neuromuscular disease known to require prolonged mechanical ventilation
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Bullae or pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, mediastinal emphysema
  • extracorporeal membrane oxygenation(ECMO) has been performed when entering the ICU
  • Refractory shock
  • Severe cardiac dysfunction (New York Heart Association class III or IV, acute coronary syndrome or persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmia), right heart enlargement due to chronic cardiopulmonary disease, cardiogenic shock or heart enlargement postoperative;
  • Failure to sign informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Wuhan, Hubei, 430000, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Zhang H, Huang W, Zhang Q, Chen X, Wang X, Liu D; Critical Care Ultrasound Study Group. Prevalence and prognostic value of various types of right ventricular dysfunction in mechanically ventilated septic patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jul 13;11(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00902-9.

  • Boissier F, Katsahian S, Razazi K, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Leon R, Vivier E, Brochard L, Vieillard-Baron A, Brun-Buisson C, Mekontso Dessap A. Prevalence and prognosis of cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1725-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2941-9. Epub 2013 May 15.

  • Dong D, Zong Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Jing C. Mortality of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome subjected to lung protective ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

  • Mekontso Dessap A, Boissier F, Charron C, Begot E, Repesse X, Legras A, Brun-Buisson C, Vignon P, Vieillard-Baron A. Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):862-870. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4141-2. Epub 2015 Dec 9.

  • Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Right ventricular function and positive pressure ventilation in clinical practice: from hemodynamic subsets to respirator settings. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Sep;29(9):1426-34. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1873-1. Epub 2003 Aug 9. No abstract available.

  • Sun X, Liu Y, Li N, You D, Zhao Y. The safety and efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18586. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018586.

  • Zhou Y, Jin X, Lv Y, Wang P, Yang Y, Liang G, Wang B, Kang Y. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1648-1659. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4912-z. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Study Officials

  • xiaojing zou, PhD

    Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

xin zhao, master

CONTACT

xiaojing zou, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2022

First Posted

June 10, 2022

Study Start

April 3, 2022

Primary Completion

February 15, 2024

Study Completion

February 15, 2024

Last Updated

June 10, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations