The Effect Of Finger Pupiling On Pain And Physiological Parameters in İnfants

NCT05412719 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 2021/210
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 80
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

. In this determined, it was carried out to determine the effect of finger puppet play on pain and physiological parameters during urine culture with urinary catheter in infants. Research Hypotheses and Variables H0: There is no difference between the pain levels of babies who were manipulated with finger puppets during urine culture sampling with urinary catheter compared to babies in the control group. H1: Babies whose finger puppet is played during urine culture sampling with urinary catheter have low pain levels. H2: Physiological parameters of babies who are played with finger puppets during urine culture sample collection with urinary catheter are positively affected.

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

pain, infants

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (19)

• pain score

  It is used for babies and children aged 2 months to 7 years. It consists of five categories that measure the baby's facial expression, leg movements, activity, crying, and comfortability. A total of 0-10 points are obtained in the scale, where each of the categories is scored between 0-2, and the increase in the score indicates that the pain also increases. According to the scoring system made after the observation, the total score is 0: the child is comfortable, calm, comfortable, 1-3: slightly uncomfortable. or mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: significant severe discomfort or significant severe pain, or both.

  before urinary catheter intervention(5 minutes ago)

• pain score

  It is used for babies and children aged 2 months to 7 years. It consists of five categories that measure the baby's facial expression, leg movements, activity, crying, and comfortability. A total of 0-10 points are obtained in the scale, where each of the categories is scored between 0-2, and the increase in the score indicates that the pain also increases. According to the scoring system made after the observation, the total score is 0: the child is comfortable, calm, comfortable, 1-3: slightly uncomfortable. or mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: significant severe discomfort or significant severe pain, or both.

  urinary catheter attempt sequence (0th minute)

• pain score

  It is used for babies and children aged 2 months to 7 years. It consists of five categories that measure the baby's facial expression, leg movements, activity, crying, and comfortability. A total of 0-10 points are obtained in the scale, where each of the categories is scored between 0-2, and the increase in the score indicates that the pain also increases. According to the scoring system made after the observation, the total score is 0: the child is comfortable, calm, comfortable, 1-3: slightly uncomfortable. or mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: significant severe discomfort or significant severe pain, or both.

  immediately after urinary catheter interventioan (0th minute)

• pain score

  It is used for babies and children aged 2 months to 7 years. It consists of five categories that measure the baby's facial expression, leg movements, activity, crying, and comfortability. A total of 0-10 points are obtained in the scale, where each of the categories is scored between 0-2, and the increase in the score indicates that the pain also increases. According to the scoring system made after the observation, the total score is 0: the child is comfortable, calm, comfortable, 1-3: slightly uncomfortable. or mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: significant severe discomfort or significant severe pain, or both.

  5 minutes after urinary catheterization

• SPO2 vital signs

  SPO2 (%) were evaluated

  before urinary catheter intervention(5 minutes ago)

• SPO2 vital signs

  SPO2 (%) were evaluated

  urinary catheter attempt sequence (0th minute)

• SPO2 vital signs

  SPO2 (%) were evaluated

  immediately after urinary catheter interventioan (0th minute)

• SPO2 vital signs

  SPO2 (%) were evaluated

  5 minutes after urinary catheterization

• blood pressure vital signs

  blood pressure (mmHg) were evaluated

  before urinary catheter intervention(5 minutes ago)

• blood pressure vital signs

  blood pressure (mmHg) were evaluated

  immediately after urinary catheter interventioan (0th minute)

• blood pressure vital signs

  blood pressure (mmHg) were evaluated

  5 minutes after urinary catheterization

• heart rate vital signs

  heart rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  before urinary catheter intervention(5 minutes ago)

• heart rate vital signs

  heart rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  urinary catheter attempt sequence (0th minute)

• heart rate vital signs

  heart rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  immediately after urinary catheter interventioan (0th minute)

• heart rate vital signs

  heart rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  5 minutes after urinary catheterization

• respiratory rate vital signs

  respiratory rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  before urinary catheter intervention(5 minutes ago)

• respiratory rate vital signs

  respiratory rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  urinary catheter attempt sequence (0th minute)

• respiratory rate vital signs

  respiratory rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  immediately after urinary catheter interventioan (0th minute)

• respiratory rate vital signs

  respiratory rate (beats/minute) were evaluated

  5 minutes after urinary catheterization

Study Arms (2)

control group

EXPERIMENTAL

. Before the procedure, the baby's pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, respiratory rate were checked by an observing nurse and recorded on the Baby Monitoring Form. * An observer nurse will assist the doctor at the beginning of the procedure, and then the baby's upper legs are kept stable in order to maintain the stability of the baby and ensure that the doctor can see the urethral opening. The other observer nurse evaluated the respiratory rate of the baby during the procedure and recorded it in the Infant Follow-up Form after the procedure was completed. * During the procedure, the baby was evaluated by both observer nurses according to the FLAAC pain scale. * No pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions were made for the baby's pain during the procedure.

Behavioral: THE EFFECT OF FINGER PUPPET MANIPULATION ON PAİN AND PHYSİOLOGıCAL PARAMETERS DURING URINARY CULTURE WITH URINARY CATHETERIZATION IN INFANTS

intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Before the procedure, the baby's heart rate, blood pressure, spo2, respiratory rate, FLACC were recorded, 5 minutes before the procedure, the finger puppet was started to be played by singing the red fish song, the baby's pulse, spo2, respiratory rate and FLACC scale were recorded during the procedure, 5 minutes after the procedure Playing more finger puppetry Evaluation of the baby's pulse, blood pressure, spo2, respiratory rate and FLAAC immediately after the procedure and five minutes later

Behavioral: THE EFFECT OF FINGER PUPPET MANIPULATION ON PAİN AND PHYSİOLOGıCAL PARAMETERS DURING URINARY CULTURE WITH URINARY CATHETERIZATION IN INFANTS

Interventions

THE EFFECT OF FINGER PUPPET MANIPULATION ON PAİN AND PHYSİOLOGıCAL PARAMETERS DURING URINARY CULTURE WITH URINARY CATHETERIZATION IN INFANTS BEHAVIORAL

the effect of finger puppet manipulation on pain and physiological parameters during urinary culture with urinary catheterization

Also known as: the effect of finger puppet manipulation on pain and physiological parameters during urinary culture with urinary catheterization

control group; intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 2 Months - 12 Months
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• The baby is between 2 and 12 months
• Suspicion/diagnosis of urinary tract infection being followed
• The baby/child does not have a vision or hearing problem (sight-hearing screening tests have been completed)
• Not taking drugs containing analgesics in the last 4 hours before the procedure
• Parents' willingness to participate in the research
• It has been determined as the appropriate cognitive level and motor development of infants/children

You may not qualify if:

• Mentally or neurologically handicapped
• Having a life-threatening illness
• Babies who failed the procedure, took longer than 3 minutes and needed to be repeated were excluded from the sample

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Okan University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Okan University

Istanbul, Tuzla, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Urinary Catheterization

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques, Urological; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Diagnosis; Catheterization; Therapeutics; Investigative Techniques

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: duygu çiçek

Model Details: Randomized Controlled two groups (control group and intervention group)

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 13, 2022
• First Posted: June 9, 2022
• Study Start: February 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: February 1, 2022
• Study Completion: February 1, 2022
• Last Updated: June 9, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)