The Impact of Motivation in Return to Work After Work Disability
1 other identifier
interventional
272
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The current research on the impact of motivation in return to work after work disability has 2 major parts: (1) a questionnaire study for which SMEC gave approval, this part is completed, (2) a RCT. The RCT will compare two groups: (a) a consult as usual (a regular consult with the medical advisor) and (b) an intervention based on motivational interviewing performed by a medical advisor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 27, 2025
CompletedJuly 3, 2024
July 1, 2024
6.7 years
November 9, 2020
July 1, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Return to work rates
How many people have (partially) returned to work
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Quality of life SF36v2
3 months
Workability index
3 months
motivation for work
3 months
basic psychological needs
1 week and 3 months
subjective experiences of the consult
1 week and 3 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CAU
ACTIVE COMPARATORA sickness funds provides a physician or paramedic's consultation with people on work disability 3 to 6 months after the onset of the sickness period. The goal of this conversation is (1) to gather information on the reason of work disability, (2) gather information of the treatment plan and (3) to encourage people to RTW. CAU stands for consult as usual
Motivational Interviewing
EXPERIMENTALMotivational Interviewing involves a conversation about behavioral change in terms of recovery or RTW. The role of the MI practitioner is to evoke change talk. By change talk, the patient expresses a desire, a reason, an ability or a need for change. It is of importance that patients themselves generate the motivation for change, and it is the practitioner's task to assist them in making informed and contemplated choices to act. The core idea is that people have to become motivated themselves to change such that the new behavior is something that they want instead of something that someone else wants. There are 4 processes: engaging, focusing, evoking and planning. Training in MI for health care professionals typically is provided in 1- to 3-day workshops. This is consistent with the 2-day training in the current research. MI was planned 3 to 6 months after the onset of work disability.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- speak and understand Dutch
- work disabled for longer than a month
You may not qualify if:
- work disabled for shorter dan 1 month or longer than 1 year
- not having the mental capabilities to understand the questionnaire
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvenlead
- University Ghentcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
KULeuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Rymenans I, Vanovenberghe C, Du Bois M, Van den Broeck A, Lauwerier E. Process Evaluation of a Motivational Interviewing Intervention in a Social Security Setting: A Qualitative Study among Work-Disabled Patients. J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Mar;34(1):141-156. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10108-4. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
PMID: 37009926DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Du Bois, Prof. dr.
KU Leuven Environment and Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 9, 2020
First Posted
June 9, 2022
Study Start
April 23, 2019
Primary Completion
December 27, 2025
Study Completion
December 27, 2025
Last Updated
July 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share