NCT05406284

Brief Summary

True coronary bifurcation lesions are still great of interest due to their complex anatomy, uncertainty of optimal stenting strategy and increased adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Provisional stenting is recommended in patients with non-complex coronary lesions while 2-stent strategies should be considered in complex coronary bifurcation lesions. However, optimal 2-stent strategy is still controversial. Double kissing (DK) crush stenting is the prominent technique in true bifurcation lesion, especially in patients with left main coronary artery disease. DK mini-culotte stenting, increasing use in clinical practice, has become popular over DK crush stenting. It was demonstrated in a bench test that stent malapposition was lower in the DK mini-culotte stenting compared to the DK crush technique. Thus, DK mini-culotte stenting may be preferred over DK crush stenting in complex true coronary bifurcation lesion. On the other hand, it was demonstrated in previous studies, less than minimal protrusion (generally called as nano protrusion) had better clinical outcomes. Kawasaki et al was first demonstrated the minimal (nano) protrusion of culotte stenting technique. Then, Toth et al revealed a novel modified culotte stenting technique named single string culotte. There was no major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients underwent single string stenting technique with a median follow-up period of 6±4 months. Unsurprisingly there was no MACE occurred in patients who underwent Szabo 2-stent technique. In the light of foregoing data, the least possible amount of protrusion is known to have the best results. In addition to this, double kissing balloon dilatation with culotte stenting technique seems to have better results than other stenting techniques. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the angiographic and clinical results of a novel DK Nano-Culotte stenting in coronary bifurcation lesion.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
2mo left

Started Jul 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress89%
Jul 2024Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 1, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2022

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 15, 2026

Expected
15 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

coronary bifurcation lesionDK nano-culotte stenting

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events)

    target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction or cardiac death

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • MACCE (major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events)

    6, 12 months

  • target lesion failure

    6, 12 months

Study Arms (1)

double kissing nano culotte stenting

Procedure: double kissing nano culotte stenting

Interventions

patients with true coronary bifurcation lesion treating with double kissing nano culotte stunting technique

double kissing nano culotte stenting

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris or patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and performing DK nano culotte stunting technique

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with de novo true bifurcation lesion (Medina classification 1,1,1 or 0,1,1 or 1,0,1)
  • The main vessel diameter is least 2.5 mm and the side branch diameter is at least 2.25 mm

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock and Killip class III-IV heart failure
  • Patients with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
  • Patients with a chronic total occlusion in the bifurcation area
  • Lesions with severe calcification that needs additional intervention such as atherectomy
  • Patients who are not suitable to use long term dual antiplatelet therapy and patients not participating in clinical follow-up
  • Patients with hematological disorders, malignancy, end stage renal (GFR\<30 ml/min) and hepatic failure
  • Patients with active bleeding
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients with life-expectancy \< 1 year
  • Patients treated with small open cell stent platforms

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, 34303, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Narbute I, Gunnes P, Mannsverk J, Meyerdierks O, Rotevatn S, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Jensen JS, Galloe A, Nikus K, Vikman S, Ravkilde J, James S, Aaroe J, Ylitalo A, Helqvist S, Sjogren I, Thayssen P, Virtanen K, Puhakka M, Airaksinen J, Lassen JF, Thuesen L; Nordic PCI Study Group. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation. 2006 Oct 31;114(18):1955-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.664920. Epub 2006 Oct 23.

    PMID: 17060387BACKGROUND
  • Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, Violini R, Lettieri C, Zanini R, Sheiban I, Paloscia L, Grube E, Schofer J, Bolognese L, Orlandi M, Niccoli G, Latib A, Airoldi F. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: the CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation. 2009 Jan 6;119(1):71-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.808402. Epub 2008 Dec 22.

    PMID: 19103990BACKGROUND
  • Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, Bennett L, Holmberg S, Cotton JM, Glennon PE, Thomas MR, Maccarthy PA, Baumbach A, Mulvihill NT, Henderson RA, Redwood SR, Starkey IR, Stables RH. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: the British Bifurcation Coronary Study: old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation. 2010 Mar 16;121(10):1235-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.888297. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

    PMID: 20194880BACKGROUND
  • Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, Bestehorn HP, Werner KD, Comberg T, Kuebler P, Buttner HJ, Neumann FJ. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(23):2859-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn455. Epub 2008 Oct 9.

    PMID: 18845665BACKGROUND
  • Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Han Y, Kan J, Chen L, Qiu C, Jiang T, Tao L, Zeng H, Li L, Xia Y, Gao C, Santoso T, Paiboon C, Wang Y, Kwan TW, Ye F, Tian N, Liu Z, Lin S, Lu C, Wen S, Hong L, Zhang Q, Sheiban I, Xu Y, Wang L, Rab TS, Li Z, Cheng G, Cui L, Leon MB, Stone GW. Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions: DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Nov 28;70(21):2605-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1066. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

    PMID: 29096915BACKGROUND
  • Toth GG, Sasi V, Franco D, Prassl AJ, Di Serafino L, Ng JCK, Szanto G, Schneller L, Ang HY, Plank G, Wijns W, Barbato E. Double-kissing culotte technique for coronary bifurcation stenting. EuroIntervention. 2020 Oct 9;16(9):e724-e733. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00130.

    PMID: 32338608BACKGROUND
  • Kawasaki T, Koga H, Serikawa T. Modified culotte stenting technique for bifurcation lesions: the cross-stenting technique. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 May;22(5):243-6.

    PMID: 20440044BACKGROUND
  • G Toth G, Pyxaras S, Mortier P, De Vroey F, Di Gioia G, Adjedj J, Pellicano M, Ferrara A, De Schryver T, Van Hoorebeke L, Verhegghe B, Barbato E, De Bruyne B, De Beule M, Wijns W. Single String Technique for Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Detailed Technical Evaluation and Feasibility Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(7):949-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.01.037. Epub 2015 May 20.

    PMID: 26003016BACKGROUND
  • Yang H, Qian J, Huang Z, Ge J. Szabo 2-stent technique for coronary bifurcation lesions: procedural and short-term outcomes. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Jul 7;20(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01605-y.

    PMID: 32635890BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2022

First Posted

June 6, 2022

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Locations