NCT05405959

Brief Summary

In this double-blinded, prospective randomized sham controlled multi centered study, the aim was to investigate the efficacy of EDF technique on pain intensity, number of active TrPs, cervical ROM and disability levels in patients with MPS on upper trapezius (UT) muscle.180 patients were randomly allocated to kinesio taping (KT) group or sham group. Applications were done two times 1 week apart. VAS-pain scores, disability scores , cervical ROM angles and number of trigger points were evaluated as outcome parameters. Vas-pain scores and number of trigger points were assessed at baseline, after 1 week and after 2 weeks (at the end of the study). Cervical ROM angles and disability (measured by Neck Pain Disability Scale) were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. Both groups received home exercise program. As a result application of KT with EDF technique to the UT muscle provided a significant improvement in pain level, disability, number of active TrPs and cervical ROM angles and found superior to sham application.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 2, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2019

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2019

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 26, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

June 22, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

May 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 16, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • pain intensity

    Visual Analog Scale: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10 cm) was used to record each patient's current level of neck pain, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain that the patient had experienced.Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Change from baseline at 2nd week

  • number of active trigger points

    number of active trigger points. Trigger points were determined manually by physical examination described by Travell and Simons.

    Change from baseline at 2nd week

  • cervical range of motion angles

    measured by goniometer for flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion of cervical spine

    Change from baseline at 2nd week

  • Disability Level

    Neck Pain Disability Scale: The questionnaire consists of 20 items and measures neck movements, pain intensity, effect of neck pain on emotion factors, and interference with daily life activities. Each section is scored on a 0-5 rating scale and total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Change from baseline at 2nd week

Study Arms (2)

Kinesiotaping (KT) with EDF technique

EXPERIMENTAL

the patients were seated and asked to flex their neck laterally to the contralateral side and to rotate their head to the same side while the shoulder was adducted. I band was first fold in half and then divided into 5 lines without cutting the ends to form a web shape. Two pieces of web shaped 20-25 cm length KT were used. The end of the KT was applied to the acromion, and the spinal process of C7 vertebra without stretching, but the web on the muscle had %10-15 tension. The second web shaped band was applied using the same technique between acromion and thoracal vertebral insertion of the middle trapezius muscle. Kinesio tape was planned to stay on for five days; it was applied twice, with two days of rest between applications Trapezius stretching exercises were given to patients as home exercise program.

Device: Kinesio tape

Sham Kinesiotaping

SHAM COMPARATOR

The sham group received improper KT application consisting two I strips (same material as the real application) applied with no tension on c7 spinal process as cross sign. For sham taping, the cervical spine of the participants was placed in a neutral position. Kinesio tape was planned to stay on for five days; it was applied twice, with two days of rest between applications Trapezius stretching exercises were given to patients as home exercise program

Device: Sham Kinesio Tape

Interventions

The Kinesio Tex Gold FP (Kinesio Tex Tape, Kinesio Holding Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA) was used. It was waterproof, porous and adhesive, had a width of 5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 mm. The same brand of tape was used in both groups.

Kinesiotaping (KT) with EDF technique

The Kinesio Tex Gold FP (Kinesio Tex Tape, Kinesio Holding Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA) was used. It was waterproof, porous and adhesive, had a width of 5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 mm. The same brand of tape was used in both groups.

Sham Kinesiotaping

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • presence of an at least one active TrP and palpable taut band in the UT muscle
  • pain duration less than 3 months
  • pain Visual Analog Score VAS≥4
  • being between 18 and 50 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • diagnosis of neuromuscular, rheumatic, inflammatory diseases
  • malignancy
  • uncontrollled systemic conditions
  • infections
  • trauma
  • neck surgery
  • pregnancy
  • obesity (BMI≥ 30 kg/m2).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duygu Külcü

Istanbul, Ataşehir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndromes

Interventions

Athletic Tape

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BandagesEquipment and SuppliesOrthotic DevicesOrthopedic EquipmentSurgical Equipment

Study Officials

  • Duygu Külcü, prof

    Haydarpaşa Numune Edutation and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Arzu Dinç

    Medipol University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Belgin Erhan

    Medeniyet University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Birkan Sonel Tur

    Ankara University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Gül Tuğba Bulut

    Istanbul E%R Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Kamil Yazıcıoğlu

    Güven Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Zeynep Alpoğuz

    Ankara State Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Elif Çiğdem Keleş

    Yeditepe University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Figen Ayhan

    Uşak University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Pınar Borman

    Hacettepe University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Merve Soysal

    Ankara University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Bahar Çakmak

    Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2022

First Posted

June 6, 2022

Study Start

January 2, 2019

Primary Completion

April 1, 2019

Study Completion

September 1, 2019

Last Updated

June 22, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations