Kinesio Tape Application With EDF Technique on Active Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius Muscle
Efficacy of Kinesio Tape Application With Epidermis Dermis Fascia (EDF) Technique in Patients With Active Myofascial Trigger Points in Upper Trapezius Muscle, a Prospective, Double Blinded Sham Controlled Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
180
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this double-blinded, prospective randomized sham controlled multi centered study, the aim was to investigate the efficacy of EDF technique on pain intensity, number of active TrPs, cervical ROM and disability levels in patients with MPS on upper trapezius (UT) muscle.180 patients were randomly allocated to kinesio taping (KT) group or sham group. Applications were done two times 1 week apart. VAS-pain scores, disability scores , cervical ROM angles and number of trigger points were evaluated as outcome parameters. Vas-pain scores and number of trigger points were assessed at baseline, after 1 week and after 2 weeks (at the end of the study). Cervical ROM angles and disability (measured by Neck Pain Disability Scale) were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. Both groups received home exercise program. As a result application of KT with EDF technique to the UT muscle provided a significant improvement in pain level, disability, number of active TrPs and cervical ROM angles and found superior to sham application.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2022
CompletedJune 22, 2022
June 1, 2022
3 months
May 26, 2022
June 16, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
pain intensity
Visual Analog Scale: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10 cm) was used to record each patient's current level of neck pain, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain that the patient had experienced.Higher scores mean worse outcome
Change from baseline at 2nd week
number of active trigger points
number of active trigger points. Trigger points were determined manually by physical examination described by Travell and Simons.
Change from baseline at 2nd week
cervical range of motion angles
measured by goniometer for flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion of cervical spine
Change from baseline at 2nd week
Disability Level
Neck Pain Disability Scale: The questionnaire consists of 20 items and measures neck movements, pain intensity, effect of neck pain on emotion factors, and interference with daily life activities. Each section is scored on a 0-5 rating scale and total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Change from baseline at 2nd week
Study Arms (2)
Kinesiotaping (KT) with EDF technique
EXPERIMENTALthe patients were seated and asked to flex their neck laterally to the contralateral side and to rotate their head to the same side while the shoulder was adducted. I band was first fold in half and then divided into 5 lines without cutting the ends to form a web shape. Two pieces of web shaped 20-25 cm length KT were used. The end of the KT was applied to the acromion, and the spinal process of C7 vertebra without stretching, but the web on the muscle had %10-15 tension. The second web shaped band was applied using the same technique between acromion and thoracal vertebral insertion of the middle trapezius muscle. Kinesio tape was planned to stay on for five days; it was applied twice, with two days of rest between applications Trapezius stretching exercises were given to patients as home exercise program.
Sham Kinesiotaping
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham group received improper KT application consisting two I strips (same material as the real application) applied with no tension on c7 spinal process as cross sign. For sham taping, the cervical spine of the participants was placed in a neutral position. Kinesio tape was planned to stay on for five days; it was applied twice, with two days of rest between applications Trapezius stretching exercises were given to patients as home exercise program
Interventions
The Kinesio Tex Gold FP (Kinesio Tex Tape, Kinesio Holding Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA) was used. It was waterproof, porous and adhesive, had a width of 5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 mm. The same brand of tape was used in both groups.
The Kinesio Tex Gold FP (Kinesio Tex Tape, Kinesio Holding Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA) was used. It was waterproof, porous and adhesive, had a width of 5 cm and a thickness of 0.5 mm. The same brand of tape was used in both groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- presence of an at least one active TrP and palpable taut band in the UT muscle
- pain duration less than 3 months
- pain Visual Analog Score VAS≥4
- being between 18 and 50 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- diagnosis of neuromuscular, rheumatic, inflammatory diseases
- malignancy
- uncontrollled systemic conditions
- infections
- trauma
- neck surgery
- pregnancy
- obesity (BMI≥ 30 kg/m2).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Duygu Külcü
Istanbul, Ataşehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Duygu Külcü, prof
Haydarpaşa Numune Edutation and Research Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arzu Dinç
Medipol University
- STUDY CHAIR
Belgin Erhan
Medeniyet University
- STUDY CHAIR
Birkan Sonel Tur
Ankara University
- STUDY CHAIR
Gül Tuğba Bulut
Istanbul E%R Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Kamil Yazıcıoğlu
Güven Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Zeynep Alpoğuz
Ankara State Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Elif Çiğdem Keleş
Yeditepe University
- STUDY CHAIR
Figen Ayhan
Uşak University
- STUDY CHAIR
Pınar Borman
Hacettepe University
- STUDY CHAIR
Merve Soysal
Ankara University
- STUDY CHAIR
Bahar Çakmak
Bakırköy Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2022
First Posted
June 6, 2022
Study Start
January 2, 2019
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share