NCT05403931

Brief Summary

LLLT is in use to treat different musculoskeletal condition. Osteoarthritis is one of the conditions needing LLLT for therapeutic effects. LLLT has been used in different previous studies using different points on joint and also on acupuncture points. This study is going to compare the effectiveness of LLLT on both points. Omega xp device is going to be used in this study.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 30, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 6, 2022

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2022

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 17, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

May 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC )

    Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index is a standard questionnaire used in knee OA to assess the outcome of an intervention. It's 24 items scale which covers pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0-96. 0 means the best health or best performance and 96 is the worst health status or performance.

    Baseline

  • Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC )

    Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index is a standard questionnaire used in knee OA to assess the outcome of an intervention. It's 24 items scale which covers pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0-96. 0 means the best health or best performance and 96 is the worst health status or performance.

    2nd week

  • Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC )

    Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index is a standard questionnaire used in knee OA to assess the outcome of an intervention. It's 24 items scale which covers pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0-96. 0 means the best health or best performance and 96 is the worst health status or performance.

    3rd week

  • Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC )

    Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index is a standard questionnaire used in knee OA to assess the outcome of an intervention. It's 24 items scale which covers pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0-96. 0 means the best health or best performance and 96 is the worst health status or performance.

    4th week

  • Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC )

    Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index is a standard questionnaire used in knee OA to assess the outcome of an intervention. It's 24 items scale which covers pain, stiffness and function. The score ranges from 0-96. 0 means the best health or best performance and 96 is the worst health status or performance.

    16th week

  • Timed Up and Go test ( TUG )

    Timed Up and Go test assesses the balance and is widely used in the clinical outcomes assessment. It's measured in seconds. Lesser the time means good balance and longer the time means poor balance.

    Baseline

  • Timed Up and Go test ( TUG )

    Timed Up and Go test assesses the balance and is widely used in the clinical outcomes assessment. It's measured in seconds. Lesser the time means good balance and longer the time means poor balance.

    2nd week

  • Timed Up and Go test ( TUG )

    Timed Up and Go test assesses the balance and is widely used in the clinical outcomes assessment. It's measured in seconds. Lesser the time means good balance and longer the time means poor balance.

    3rd week

  • Timed Up and Go test ( TUG )

    Timed Up and Go test assesses the balance and is widely used in the clinical outcomes assessment. It's measured in seconds. Lesser the time means better performance and longer the time means poor performance.

    4th week

  • Timed Up and Go test ( TUG )

    Timed Up and Go test assesses the balance and is widely used in the clinical outcomes assessment. It's measured in seconds. Lesser the time means good balance and longer the time means poor balance.

    16th week

  • Visual Analog Scale ( VAS )

    Visual Analog Scale is a widely used tool to assess pain in knee OA. The score ranges from 0-100. 0 means no pain and 100 means the worst pain.

    Baseline

  • Visual Analog Scale ( VAS )

    Visual Analog Scale is a widely used tool to assess pain in knee OA. The score ranges from 0-100. 0 means no pain and 100 means the worst pain.

    2nd week

  • Visual Analog Scale ( VAS )

    Visual Analog Scale is a widely used tool to assess pain in knee OA. The score ranges from 0-100. 0 means no pain and 100 means the worst pain.

    3rd week

  • Visual Analog Scale ( VAS )

    Visual Analog Scale is a widely used tool to assess pain in knee OA. The score ranges from 0-100. 0 means no pain and 100 means the worst pain.

    4th week

  • Visual Analog Scale ( VAS )

    Visual Analog Scale is a widely used tool to assess pain in knee OA. The score ranges from 0-100. 0 means no pain and 100 means the worst pain.

    16th week

Study Arms (2)

Particular joint point group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will receive laser irradiation on 6-7 particular points including 4-5 on tibiofemoral and 2 on patellofemoral joint.

Device: Low level laser therapy

Acupuncture points group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will receive laser irradiation on 6-7 particular acupuncture points which have been previously used in another study and or identified in literature.

Device: Low level laser therapy

Interventions

Omega XP is the particular device producing low level laser therapy and has been in use for therapeutic purposes to treat different musculoskeletal conditions.

Also known as: Cold laser therapy
Acupuncture points groupParticular joint point group

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pain in the knee joint ( minimum 30/100 on VAS )
  • Kellgren-Lawrence Grade III knee OA
  • ACR criteria for knee OA with radiological findings including ;
  • age 35 and above
  • joint crepitus
  • less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness

You may not qualify if:

  • Knee OA grade other than III.
  • Any contraindication of LLLT including;
  • pregnancy
  • carcinoma involving knee area
  • Steroids and NSAIDS use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Central Park Teaching Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Hegedus B, Viharos L, Gervain M, Galfi M. The effect of low-level laser in knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Aug;27(4):577-84. doi: 10.1089/pho.2008.2297.

    PMID: 19530911BACKGROUND
  • Bjordal JM, Couppe C, Chow RT, Tuner J, Ljunggren EA. A systematic review of low level laser therapy with location-specific doses for pain from chronic joint disorders. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(2):107-16. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60127-6.

    PMID: 12775206BACKGROUND
  • Al Rashoud AS, Abboud RJ, Wang W, Wigderowitz C. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy applied at acupuncture points in knee osteoarthritis: a randomised double-blind comparative trial. Physiotherapy. 2014 Sep;100(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

    PMID: 24418801BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Interventions

Low-Level Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laser TherapyTherapeuticsPhototherapy

Study Officials

  • Adnan Afzal, PhD

    University of Technology Malaysia

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Person assessing the outcomes will have no knowledge that patient received laser therapy on which points of knee area.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Interventional study to compare the effectiveness of low level laser therapy on two groups of points of irradiation in knee OA grade III. One group of points involves 6-7 particular points on tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints. Other group involves the 6-7 particular acupuncture points which have been previously used in a study. Outcomes will indicate that which group irradiation will produce better therapeutic results.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2022

First Posted

June 3, 2022

Study Start

April 30, 2022

Primary Completion

July 30, 2023

Study Completion

September 30, 2023

Last Updated

May 17, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations