Biomechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Thoracolumbar Fascia in Pregnancy Pelvic Girdle Pain
Investigation of Biomechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Thoracolumbar Fascia in Pregnant Women With Pelvic Girdle Pain
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It has not been objectively clarified how the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) changes the biomechanical adaptations that occur in the lumbopelvic region during pregnancy and whether it is associated with pelvic girdle pain (PGP). Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of TLF, which adapts to the changes in the lumbopelvic region in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, and to investigate its relationship with PGP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 15, 2025
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
3.2 years
April 15, 2022
September 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Evaluation of biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar fascia
Measuring of the stiffness (N/m) of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.
Measurement the change from baseline stiffness values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week
Evaluation of biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar fascia
Measuring of the decrement of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.
Measurement the change from baseline decrement values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week
Evaluation of biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar fascia
Measuring of the tone (Hz) of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.
Measurement the change from baseline tone values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week
Evaluation of viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fascia
Measuring of the creep of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.
Measurement the change from baseline creep values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week
Evaluation of viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fascia
Measuring of thethe relaxation time (ms) of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.
Measurement the change from baseline relaxation time values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Determining of painful areas
Baseline
Evaluation of pain
Baseline
Application of Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) diagnostic tests
Baseline
Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire
Baseline
Evaluation of Body Weight
Measurement the change from baseline body weight (kg) at 12. and 22. weeks.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Group 1: Pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain
This group will consist of pregnant women diagnosed with pelvic girdle pain.
Group 2: Pregnant women without pelvic girdle pain
This group will consist of pregnant women who do not have pelvic girdle pain.
Group 3: Non-pregnant women
This group will consist of non-pregnant women.
Interventions
The severity of pelvic girdle pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Pelvic girdle pain diagnostic tests will be applied.
The biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of the thoracolumbar fascia will be measured in the prone position and measurements will be taken from three different points
Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire will be filled
Eligibility Criteria
Pregnant women with and without PGP and non-pregnant women
You may qualify if:
- First-time pregnancy
- Pregnant women diagnosed with pelvic girdle pain in 1st and 2nd trimesters
- Pregnant women who do not have pelvic girdle pain in 1st and 2nd trimesters
- Women not being pregnant
- Pre-pregnancy Body-Mass-Index (BMI) \< 30 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of connective tissue disease
- Deterioration of skin integrity in measurement areas
- Presence of orthopedic, neurological, rheumatic problems that may cause musculoskeletal disorders and deviations from normal biomechanical alignment
- History of spine, pelvis, or lower extremity surgery or fracture in the past 6 months
- Definition of chronic low back-pelvic region pain (lasting for more than 3 months and pain severity \>4 according to VAS) before pregnancy
- Identification of metabolic disorders such as Type I, II diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia before and/or during pregnancy)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
İstanbul Medeniyet University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Alcaraz-Clariana S, Garcia-Luque L, Garrido-Castro JL, Carmona-Perez C, Rodrigues-de-Souza DP, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Alburquerque-Sendin F. Influence of Spinal Movements Associated with Physical Evaluation on Muscle Mechanical Properties of the Lumbar Paraspinal in Subjects with Acute Low Back Pain. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;12(2):302. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020302.
PMID: 35204392RESULTAldabe D, Milosavljevic S, Bussey MD. A multivariate model for predicting PPGP considering postural adjustment parameters. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Aug;48:102153. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102153. Epub 2020 May 5.
PMID: 32560861RESULTLohr C, Braumann KM, Reer R, Schroeder J, Schmidt T. Reliability of tensiomyography and myotonometry in detecting mechanical and contractile characteristics of the lumbar erector spinae in healthy volunteers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jul;118(7):1349-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3867-2. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
PMID: 29679246RESULTWu Z, Wang Y, Ye Z, Guan Y, Ye X, Chen Z, Li C, Chen G, Zhu Y, Du J, Chen G, Liu W, Xu X. Effects of Age and Sex on Properties of Lumbar Erector Spinae in Healthy People: Preliminary Results From a Pilot Study. Front Physiol. 2021 Sep 20;12:718068. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.718068. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34616306RESULTStuge B, Garratt A, Krogstad Jenssen H, Grotle M. The pelvic girdle questionnaire: a condition-specific instrument for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in people with pelvic girdle pain. Phys Ther. 2011 Jul;91(7):1096-108. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100357. Epub 2011 May 19.
PMID: 21596959RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 15, 2022
First Posted
June 3, 2022
Study Start
June 1, 2022
Primary Completion
August 15, 2025
Study Completion
October 15, 2025
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09