NCT05403424

Brief Summary

It has not been objectively clarified how the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) changes the biomechanical adaptations that occur in the lumbopelvic region during pregnancy and whether it is associated with pelvic girdle pain (PGP). Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of TLF, which adapts to the changes in the lumbopelvic region in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain, and to investigate its relationship with PGP.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 15, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2022

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 3, 2022

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 15, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

April 15, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

pregnant womenpelvic girdle painthoracolumbar fasciastiffnesscreep

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Evaluation of biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar fascia

    Measuring of the stiffness (N/m) of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.

    Measurement the change from baseline stiffness values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week

  • Evaluation of biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar fascia

    Measuring of the decrement of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.

    Measurement the change from baseline decrement values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week

  • Evaluation of biomechanical properties of thoracolumbar fascia

    Measuring of the tone (Hz) of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.

    Measurement the change from baseline tone values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week

  • Evaluation of viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fascia

    Measuring of the creep of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.

    Measurement the change from baseline creep values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week

  • Evaluation of viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fascia

    Measuring of thethe relaxation time (ms) of the thoracolumbar fascia (with MyotonPro, Myoton AS, Tallin, Estonia) in the prone position.

    Measurement the change from baseline relaxation time values of Thoracolumbar fascia at 12. week and at 22. week

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Determining of painful areas

    Baseline

  • Evaluation of pain

    Baseline

  • Application of Pelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) diagnostic tests

    Baseline

  • Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire

    Baseline

  • Evaluation of Body Weight

    Measurement the change from baseline body weight (kg) at 12. and 22. weeks.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Group 1: Pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain

This group will consist of pregnant women diagnosed with pelvic girdle pain.

Other: Evaluation of painDiagnostic Test: Application of pelvic girdle diagnostic testsOther: Evaluation of biomechanics and viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fasciaOther: Evaluation of activity limitation

Group 2: Pregnant women without pelvic girdle pain

This group will consist of pregnant women who do not have pelvic girdle pain.

Other: Evaluation of painDiagnostic Test: Application of pelvic girdle diagnostic testsOther: Evaluation of biomechanics and viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fasciaOther: Evaluation of activity limitation

Group 3: Non-pregnant women

This group will consist of non-pregnant women.

Other: Evaluation of biomechanics and viscoelastic properties of thoracolumbar fascia

Interventions

The severity of pelvic girdle pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Group 1: Pregnant women with pelvic girdle painGroup 2: Pregnant women without pelvic girdle pain

Pelvic girdle pain diagnostic tests will be applied.

Group 1: Pregnant women with pelvic girdle painGroup 2: Pregnant women without pelvic girdle pain

The biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of the thoracolumbar fascia will be measured in the prone position and measurements will be taken from three different points

Group 1: Pregnant women with pelvic girdle painGroup 2: Pregnant women without pelvic girdle painGroup 3: Non-pregnant women

Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire will be filled

Group 1: Pregnant women with pelvic girdle painGroup 2: Pregnant women without pelvic girdle pain

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsPregnant women Healty Women
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Pregnant women with and without PGP and non-pregnant women

You may qualify if:

  • First-time pregnancy
  • Pregnant women diagnosed with pelvic girdle pain in 1st and 2nd trimesters
  • Pregnant women who do not have pelvic girdle pain in 1st and 2nd trimesters
  • Women not being pregnant
  • Pre-pregnancy Body-Mass-Index (BMI) \< 30 kg/m2

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of connective tissue disease
  • Deterioration of skin integrity in measurement areas
  • Presence of orthopedic, neurological, rheumatic problems that may cause musculoskeletal disorders and deviations from normal biomechanical alignment
  • History of spine, pelvis, or lower extremity surgery or fracture in the past 6 months
  • Definition of chronic low back-pelvic region pain (lasting for more than 3 months and pain severity \>4 according to VAS) before pregnancy
  • Identification of metabolic disorders such as Type I, II diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), preeclampsia before and/or during pregnancy)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

İstanbul Medeniyet University

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Alcaraz-Clariana S, Garcia-Luque L, Garrido-Castro JL, Carmona-Perez C, Rodrigues-de-Souza DP, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Alburquerque-Sendin F. Influence of Spinal Movements Associated with Physical Evaluation on Muscle Mechanical Properties of the Lumbar Paraspinal in Subjects with Acute Low Back Pain. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;12(2):302. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020302.

  • Aldabe D, Milosavljevic S, Bussey MD. A multivariate model for predicting PPGP considering postural adjustment parameters. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Aug;48:102153. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102153. Epub 2020 May 5.

  • Lohr C, Braumann KM, Reer R, Schroeder J, Schmidt T. Reliability of tensiomyography and myotonometry in detecting mechanical and contractile characteristics of the lumbar erector spinae in healthy volunteers. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Jul;118(7):1349-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3867-2. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

  • Wu Z, Wang Y, Ye Z, Guan Y, Ye X, Chen Z, Li C, Chen G, Zhu Y, Du J, Chen G, Liu W, Xu X. Effects of Age and Sex on Properties of Lumbar Erector Spinae in Healthy People: Preliminary Results From a Pilot Study. Front Physiol. 2021 Sep 20;12:718068. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.718068. eCollection 2021.

  • Stuge B, Garratt A, Krogstad Jenssen H, Grotle M. The pelvic girdle questionnaire: a condition-specific instrument for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in people with pelvic girdle pain. Phys Ther. 2011 Jul;91(7):1096-108. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100357. Epub 2011 May 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Girdle Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Musculoskeletal PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPelvic Pain

Central Study Contacts

Nilüfer KABLAN, PhD

CONTACT

Merve Can, Msc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2022

First Posted

June 3, 2022

Study Start

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion

August 15, 2025

Study Completion

October 15, 2025

Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Locations