The BEST Trial: Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments
BEST
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,014
1 country
12
Brief Summary
The BEST Trial (Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments) is a National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)-sponsored clinical trial being conducted through the NIH Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative's Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program. The primary objective of this trial is to inform a precision medicine approach to the treatment of Chronic Low-Back Pain by estimating the optimal treatment or combination of treatments based on patient features and response to the initial treatment. Interventions being evaluated in this trial are: (1) enhanced self-care (ESC), (2) acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), (3) evidence-based exercise and manual therapy (EBEM), and (4) duloxetine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Sep 2022
Typical duration for phase_4
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 22, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 23, 2025
CompletedJuly 23, 2025
August 1, 2024
1.9 years
May 24, 2022
May 30, 2025
July 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient-Reported Pain Intensity and Interference Score
Patient-reported pain intensity and interference is measured by the Pain, Enjoyment of Life, and General Activity (PEG) scale. The PEG is a series of 3 questions. Results range from -10 to 10, with higher scores indicating increased pain intensity and interference at 24 Weeks compared to Baseline.
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Number of Participants Self-Reporting Taking Opioids
24 Weeks
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System- Physical Function
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Depression Score
Baseline, 24 Weeks
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Emotional Distress-Anxiety
Baseline, 24 Weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Treatment Period 1: Enhanced Self-Care (ESC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm includes participants who are randomized to ESC in Treatment Period 1. Depending on their response to Treatment 1 measured at 12 Weeks post-initial randomization, participants in this arm will stay on ESC or be randomized to augment ESC with an additional treatment during Treatment Period 2.
Treatment Period 1: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm includes participants who are randomized to ACT in Treatment Period 1. Depending on their response to Treatment 1 measured at 12 Weeks post-initial randomization, participants in this arm will stay on ACT, augment ACT with an additional treatment, or switch to a new treatment during Treatment Period 2.
Treatment Period 1: Evidence-Based Exercise and Manual Therapy (EBEM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm includes participants who are randomized to EBEM in Treatment Period 1. Depending on their response to Treatment 1 measured at 12 Weeks post-initial randomization, participants in this arm will stay on EBEM, augment EBEM with an additional treatment, or switch to a new treatment during Treatment Period 2.
Treatment Period 1: Duloxetine
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm includes participants who are randomized to Duloxetine in Treatment Period 1. Depending on their response to Treatment 1 measured at 12 Weeks post-initial randomization, participants in this arm will stay on Duloxetine, augment Duloxetine with an additional treatment, or switch to a new treatment during Treatment Period 2.
Interventions
The Enhanced Self-Care intervention will be comprised of educational modules on evidence-based cognitive-behavioral self-management skills for pain. These modules will be provided digitally for self-administration over a period of 12 weeks. There will be no therapist associated with the delivery of these educational materials; however, after the first four modules, email or text messages will be used to make personalized recommendations for accessing additional modules based upon identified problems from the baseline assessment. Additionally, the walking program module will utilize Fitbit step tracking to allow participants to monitor their walking progress.
ACT is a form of cognitive behavioral therapy that is well established for the treatment of chronic pain. The goal of ACT is to build psychological flexibility thereby interrupting pain avoidance behavior patterns. Participants randomized to ACT will take part in 12 sessions over the course of 12 weeks. Sessions will be delivered as a combination of 4 remote face-to-face visits with a therapist and 8 therapist-supported online sessions (self-directed online modules supported by provider coaching). Online sessions will focus on helping participants accept pain, connect with negative thoughts and emotions, develop mindfulness and identify and commit to values and goals that are important to them. During face-to-face sessions with the therapist, participants will be encouraged to share their experience of skills practice and mastery, provide examples of skill use at home, and describe what barriers they encountered.
Licensed physical therapists (PTs) or Doctors of Chiropractic (DCs) will rely on evidence-based guidance to direct decision-making on the particular type of manual and exercise therapy that may be best suited to an individual study participant. Special attention will be paid to the clinician's choice of language in regard to the purpose and expected outcomes of manual therapy in order to avoid enhancing catastrophizing ideations or preference for passive interventions. A total of 10 sessions will be provided over an 8-week treatment period. Two sessions per week are provided in the first two weeks followed by weekly sessions over the next 6 weeks. Treatment sessions will last approximately 60 minutes each.
Duloxetine is a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) that is FDA-approved for use in Chronic Low-Back Pain, and, as such, is included as a recommended therapy in nearly all current treatment guidelines for low back pain. Study participants will be treated with duloxetine for 12 weeks during the active treatment phase. At the time of randomization, the approved drug pharmacy at each study site will dispense between 185 and 192 duloxetine 30 mg capsules and provide to participants. This will ensure enough capsules to maintain up to a 60 mg dosage through the 12-week intervention phase and to taper the dose in the 13th week if needed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ability to read and understand English
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form(s)
- Willing and able to receive study-related messages and survey links via email
- Willing and able to receive study-related phone calls
- Age 18 years old or older
- Low-back pain for at least 3 months and occurring on at least half the days in the past 6 months
- Contraindicated to no more than one of the study interventions at the time of eligibility assessment(s)
- Eligible to receive at least three of the four study interventions and willing to receive any intervention for which they are eligible
- A PEG score 4 or higher prior to the Run-in period
- Willing and able to undergo required phenotyping
- Regular reliable access to an internet-enabled device such as a smart phone, tablet, or laptop computer
- Meet Run-in period engagement eligibility criteria:
- o Completion of two Run-in study information modules prior to period 1 randomization (Visit 0)
- Low-back pain more severe than pain in other parts of the body
- Available to complete the full study protocol (approximately 9 months)
You may not qualify if:
- An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Pregnant at the time of Visit 0 (Baseline)
- Affirmative participant response to any of the following conditions:
- Progressive neurodegenerative disease
- History of discitis osteomyelitis (spine infection) or spine tumor
- History of ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, psoriatic arthritis, or lupus
- History of cauda equina syndrome or spinal radiculopathy with functional motor deficit (strength \<4/5 on manual motor testing)
- Diagnosis of any vertebral fracture in the last 6 months
- Osteoporosis requiring pharmacologic treatment other than vitamin D, calcium supplements, or bisphosphonates.
- History of any bone-related cancer or cancer that metastasized to the bone
- Currently in treatment for any non-skin cancer or plan to start non-skin cancer treatment in the next 12 months
- History of any non-skin cancer treatment in the last 24 months
- Visual or hearing difficulties that would preclude participation
- Uncontrolled drug/alcohol addiction
- Individuals actively pursuing disability or workers compensation or involved in active personal injury-related litigation
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Stanford University
Redwood City, California, 94063, United States
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, California, 92037, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
University of Kansas Health System
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital/Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48189, United States
University of North Carolina Hospital Pain Management Clinic
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27517, United States
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43203, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Related Publications (3)
Rowland B, Barth KS, Bell KM, Brooks AK, Chadwick AL, Cleven A, Hurley RW, Mackey S, Patel KV, Piva SR, Schneider MJ, Al-Kadhi F, Asante-Nketiah B, Bagaason S, Batorsky A, Borckardt JJ, Bowden AE, Carey TS, Castellanos J, Chen L, Chidgey B, Dalton D, Dufour JS, Eberting JL, Eller SM, Fields AJ, Fritz JM, Fu A, Ghulamhussain I, Goolsby RW, Greco CM, Grim S, Gunn CA, Hanes L, Harris RE, Harte SE, Hassett AL, Helton K, Hoffmeyer A, Ivanova A, Jones Berkeley S, Kaplan C, Kidwell KM, Knapik GG, Kosorok MR, Kurillo G, Li D, Lobo R, Long J, Lotz JC, Mageswaran P, Majumdar S, Mao J, Marras WS, McCracken LM, McCumber M, McLean SA, McMillan M, Mehling W, Mendoza R, Mitchell UH, Napadow V, O'Neill C, Pearson S, Peltier S, Rundell SD, Ryser S, Schrepf A, Schulze E, Sperger J, Vo N, Wallace MS, Wampler AM, Wasan AD, Weaver TE, Weber KA 2nd, Wilcox L, Williams DA, Wilson L, Woo JE, Zeidan F, Zhao B, Zhou B, Anstrom KJ, Clauw DJ, Sowa GA, Mauck MC. Baseline characteristics of participants in the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments clinical trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for chronic low back paindagger. Pain Med. 2025 Nov 1;26(11):758-772. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaf073.
PMID: 40794568DERIVEDJones Berkeley S, Wedin S, Patidar SM, Margolies SO, Goetzinger AM, Mauck MC, Wasan AD, McCracken LM. Design and implementation of online acceptance and commitment therapy with enhanced therapist support for chronic low back pain (ACT for PAIN). Pain Med. 2025 Aug 1;26(8):451-458. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaf026.
PMID: 40249098DERIVEDMauck MC, Barth KS, Bell KM, Brooks AK, Chadwick AL, Gunn CA, Hurley RW, Ivanova A, Piva SR, Schneider MJ, Bailey JF, Bagaason S, Batorsky A, Borckardt JJ, Bowden AE, Carey TS, Castellanos J, Chen L, Chidgey B, Dalton D, Dufour JS, Fields AJ, Fritz JM, Goolsby RW, Greco CM, Harris RE, Harte S, Hassett AL, Hoffmeyer A, Jones Berkeley S, Kaplan C, Kidwell KM, Knapik GG, Kosorok MR, Kurillo G, Lobo R, Lotz JC, Mackey S, Mageswaran P, Majumdar S, Mao J, Marras WS, McCumber M, McLean SA, Mehling W, Mitchell UH, Napadow VJ, O'Neill C, Patel KV, Peltier S, Psioda M, Rowland B, Rundell SD, Schrepf A, Sperger J, Vo N, Wallace MS, Wasan AD, Weaver TE, Weber KA 2nd, Williams DA, Wilson L, Zeidan F, Zhao B, Anstrom KJ, Clauw DJ, Sowa GA. The design and rationale of the Biomarkers for Evaluating Spine Treatments trial: a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Pain Med. 2025 Sep 1;26(9):538-553. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaf032.
PMID: 40205455DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The BEST Trial is a sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial designed to estimate the optimal treatment (or sequence) for chronic low back pain based on unique biomarkers and response to treatment. As this precision-medicine focus dictates individualized rather than arm-level contrasts, no between-arm comparative-effectiveness analyses are planned as primary analyses. The primary goal of this study was to identify predictive biomarkers for each treatment not comparative effectiveness.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Matthew Mauck, MD, PhD
- Organization
- UNC Chapel Hill
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin Anstrom, PhD
UNC Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Mauck, PhD
UNC Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gwendolyn Sowa, PhD
University of Pittsburgh
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Clauw, MD
University of Michigan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2022
First Posted
May 27, 2022
Study Start
September 12, 2022
Primary Completion
July 30, 2024
Study Completion
October 22, 2024
Last Updated
July 23, 2025
Results First Posted
July 23, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Data will be made publicly available on the NIH HEAL Platform or other NIH repositories after acceptance of publication for the primary results per NIH HEAL Data Sharing Policy and will remain available for a minimum of 10 years.
- Access Criteria
- BACPAC Data Access and Publications Policy: https://sites.cscc.unc.edu/cscc/sites/default/files/bacpac/qxq/BACPAC\ Data\ Access\ and\ Publications\ Policy.pdf Data from this study may be requested by other researchers by using the HEAL Data Platform: https://heal.nih.gov/data/heal-data-ecosystem
All relevant study data will be shared through NIH portals as required.