NCT05395286

Brief Summary

Conduct and evaluate the impact of two week-long Innovation Labs on collaboration attitudes and behavior among early career scholars. Applicants to each Innovation Lab will be screened and then randomized to either the Innovation Lab group or a control group.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
94

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 3, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 12, 2019

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 25, 2020

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 19, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 27, 2022

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

May 19, 2022

Results QC Date

September 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • MATRICx Collaboration Benefits/Motivators Scale

    Self-report: The Motivation Assessment for Team Readiness, Integration, and Collaboration (MATRICx; Mallinson, Lotrecchiano, et al., 2016) benefits scale includes 17 items that tap into perceived motivators/benefits of collaboration. Each is rated on a 1-4 scale. Scale scores were computed as the mean of all 17 items, for a benefits scale score ranging from 1-4, with higher scores indicating greater collaboration readiness.

    15 months

  • MATRICx Collaboration Barriers/Threats Scale

    Self-report: The Motivation Assessment for Team Readiness, Integration, and Collaboration (MATRICx; Mallinson, Lotrecchiano, et al., 2016) Threats Scale includes 31 barriers to -- or threats of -- collaboration. Each is rated on a 1-4 scale. Scale scores were computed as the mean of all 31 items, for a Barriers/Threats scale score ranging from 1-4, with lower scores indicating greater collaboration readiness.

    15 months

  • Transdisciplinary Orientation Scale

    Self-report: The Transdisciplinary Orientation scale (TDO; Misra, Stokols, \& Cheng, 2015) is a 12-item scale that measures values, attitudes, and beliefs, and conceptual skills and behaviors, that assesses the degree to which participants are oriented towards transdisciplinary collaboration. Items are rated on a five-point scale (1="Strongly Disagree," 5="Strongly Agree"). The total score is the mean of all 12 items, with a resulting 1-5 range, in which higher scores indicate greater transdisciplinary collaboration orientation.

    15 months

  • Collaboration Network Size

    Objective number of collaborators from published articles on PubMed

    36 Months (18-monts pre- and post-treatment, after excluding articles published within +/-3 months of the Innovation Lab)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Self-Reported Number of Grants Submitted Per Year

    21 months (9 months pre-treatment [obtained at baseline and EOT]; 12 months post-treatment [obtained at 6- and 12-month follow-up])

  • ILab Met Goal - New Collab

    12 months (End of Treatment [3 months post-baseline], 6-Month Follow-Up [9 months post-baseline], and 12-Month Follow-Up [15 months post-baseline])

  • ILab Met Goal - Novel Proposals

    12 months (End of Treatment [3 months post-baseline], 6-Month Follow-Up [9 months post-baseline], and 12-Month Follow-Up [15 months post-baseline])

  • ILab - Recommend

    12 months (End of Treatment [3 months post-baseline], 6-Month Follow-Up [9 months post-baseline], and 12-Month Follow-Up [15 months post-baseline])

  • ILab - Positive Impact

    12 months (End of Treatment [3 months post-baseline], 6-Month Follow-Up [9 months post-baseline], and 12-Month Follow-Up [15 months post-baseline])

Study Arms (2)

Innovation Lab Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Randomized to attend the Innovation Lab

Behavioral: Innovation Lab

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Randomized to NOT attend the Innovation Lab

Interventions

Innovation LabBEHAVIORAL

An Innovation Lab is a facilitated 5-day residential event designed to create novel, transdisciplinary and potentially transformative research ideas and proposals to address a specific grand challenge. Participants, along with a director, organizers, subject matter guides, and KI facilitators communally explore the problem space, generate a broad range of ideas, and form transdisciplinary teams to pursue research projects.

Innovation Lab Group

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Completion of application and baseline assessment.
  • Faculty at a NIH CTSA hub institution or regional partner.
  • Early stage investigators (NIH-defined as "within 10 years of completing his/her terminal research degree or is within 10 years of completing medical residency (or the equivalent)") who are emerging as independent scholars.
  • Ratings of goodness of fit with the topic of the Innovation Lab. Applications were reviewed for the above criteria and ranked by committee according to goodness of fit with the topic of the Innovation Lab, the quality and quantity of academic productivity and collaboration, and contribution to diversity of perspectives among Lab participants (e.g., biomedical and social/psychological, basic and applied). Top-ranked applicants were retained for randomization to the Innovation Lab group or control group.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University at Buffalo

Buffalo, New York, 14260, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Hawk LW Jr, Murphy TF, Hartmann KE, Burnett A, Maguin E. A randomized controlled trial of a team science intervention to enhance collaboration readiness and behavior among early career scholars in the Clinical and Translational Science Award network. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Dec 14;8(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.692. eCollection 2024.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Behavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Larry Hawk
Organization
University at Buffalo

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2022

First Posted

May 27, 2022

Study Start

August 3, 2017

Primary Completion

July 12, 2019

Study Completion

June 25, 2020

Last Updated

April 27, 2026

Results First Posted

April 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Locations