Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visual Functions of Adult Amblyopia: a Preliminary Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Amblyopia, with a prevalence rates of 3% in adult population, is a common cause of vision impairment. It is characterized by impaired vision in one or both eyes because of disruption of normal visual stimuli and underdevelopment of the visual cortex, leads to lifelong visual deficits affecting both monocular and binocular visual function. Common causes of amblyopia include refraction error, anisometropia, strabismus and visual deprivation arising from ptosis or congenital cataract. Our previous studies had shed light on the relationship between abnormal early visual experience, and development of later amblyopia and possible neural developmental disorders. Functional recovery is difficult when neuroplasticity slows down at the end of the critical period. To date, there is no established effective treatment for adult amblyopia. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one of the non-invasive stimulations had been used widely as a research tool to understand the brain functions and an established treatment modality in neuropsychiatric diseases. Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a newer form of rTMS protocol which have a major advantage over traditional rTMS in their reduced administration duration and allowing stimulation at significantly lower intensities to attain comparable effects. TBS had been demonstrated to able to improve functions in participants with visual disorders. However, studies of its use on adult amblyopia are scarce. Due to lack of efficient treatment at present, it is of scientific significance to conduct placebo-controlled experiments on this topic. Investigators will evaluate the effect of three regimens of TBS (intermittent, continuous and sham), after one session and accumulative sessions, on visual functions of amblyopia adults shortly after treatment and 2 weeks later (lasting effect), in order to evaluate its potential role in amblyopia and find out the best paradigm for amblyopia treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJune 22, 2025
June 1, 2025
3 years
May 2, 2022
June 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Objective
Change from baseline best corrected visual acuity: distance visual acuity measured for each eye at a distance of 6 m. Visual acuity scored letter-by-letter instead and lonarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scores were recored.
1 month for each participant
Study Arms (3)
Intermittent theta burst
EXPERIMENTALThe total TBS time is about 1 to 3 minutes and the subjects have to look at at a visual stimulus on a computer monitor while receiving TBS and continue the visual training until 20 minutes after the treatment. In iTBS group, the subjects look at the visual stimulus with amblyopic eye while in cTBS group, subjects look at visual stimulus with non-amblyopic eye. The subjects will receive three times of stimulations in one week. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.
Continuous theta burst
EXPERIMENTALThe total TBS time is about 1 to 3 minutes and the subjects have to look at at a visual stimulus on a computer monitor while receiving TBS and continue the visual training until 20 minutes after the treatment. In iTBS group, the subjects look at the visual stimulus with amblyopic eye while in cTBS group, subjects look at visual stimulus with non-amblyopic eye. The subjects will receive three times of stimulations in one week. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.
Sham theta burst
SHAM COMPARATORThe stimulus intensity in sham group is about half of that in iTBS/cTBS groups, and the subjects receive a placebo stimulation with the coil orientation tilted to 90°. The visual function evaluation includes BCVA, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity. Visual functions will be evaluated right after TBS session (t1). Participant will receive same type of treatment for another 2 times within one week followed by visual function tests (t2). To evaluate the long-term effect, participants will be followed for another visual function tests (t3) after 2 weeks.
Interventions
The procedure includes determining the specific occipital point at which place the stimulation coil; this corresponds to the area where magnetic stimulation is most capable of inducing phosphenes or transient visual phenomena. The phosphenes are directly induced by stimulation of the visual cortex and their presence indicates that the magnetic stimulation is in the correct location. The subjects would wear a personalized swimming cap with the determined area for stimulation marked on it. The major differences between iTBS and cTBS are the frequency and interval of stimulus.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult amblyopia participants, aged 20-50 years old.
- An amblyogenic factor and history of amblyopia treatment was recorded
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable vital sign
- History of brain injury and/or head trauma
- Neurological and psychiatric disease
- Seizures or family history of seizure
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled migraine or the presence of metallic implants or shunt in the head or torso
- Wide region of ischemic cicatrix, multiple sclerosis, taking tricycle antidepressants,
- Analgesics or any drugs may decrease the threshold for inducing seizure
- Experienced sleep disorders during the rTMS treatment
- Severe alcoholism or taking seizure drugs
- Severe heart diseases or uncontrollable migraine caused by high intracranial pressure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei County, 100225, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tzu-Hsun Tsai
National Taiwan University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2022
First Posted
May 26, 2022
Study Start
January 5, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06