E-CLAIR: Efficiency and Cost-effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Based Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Flanders
E-CLAIR
1 other identifier
interventional
1,200
1 country
4
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of an artificial intelligence based diabetic retinopathy screening program in Flanders
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedMay 26, 2022
May 1, 2022
1.4 years
October 1, 2021
May 20, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
sensitivity
To evaluate the efficiency of the use of AI in screening for DRP: sensitivity
6 months
specificity
To evaluate the efficiency of the use of AI in screening for DRP: specificity
6 months
AUC
To evaluate the efficiency of the use of AI in screening for DRP: AUC
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
precision
6 months
decision tree model
6 months
recall
6 months
F1 score
6 months
false positives and false negatives
6 months
Study Arms (3)
current workflow in Flanders
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatient visits ophthalmologist
AI-only workflow
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatient is imaged, images are interpreted by DR AI tool, only referrable cases identified by DR AI tool will visit ophthalmologist
AI-human workflow
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatient is imaged, images are interpreted by DR AI tool, referrable cases identified by DR AI tool will be remotely graded by a human, only the high risk patients will visit ophthalmologist
Interventions
a form of artificial intelligence (AI), has been introduced for automated analysis of images
referrable cases identified by DR AI tool will be remotely graded by a human
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
- Age \> 18 years old
- Patient is capable of giving informed consent
- Fluent in written and oral Dutch, or interpreter present
You may not qualify if:
- \- History of treatment for diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema (laser or intravitreal injections)
- Participant is contraindicated for imaging by fundus imaging systems used in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
UZA
Antwerp, Belgium
ZNA
Antwerp, Belgium
AZ sint Jan
Bruges, Belgium
AZ Turnhout
Turnhout, Belgium
Related Publications (16)
Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, Cavan D, Shaw JE, Makaroff LE. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
PMID: 28437734BACKGROUNDKempen JH, O'Colmain BJ, Leske MC, Haffner SM, Klein R, Moss SE, Taylor HR, Hamman RF; Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;122(4):552-63. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.552.
PMID: 15078674BACKGROUNDLee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015 Sep 30;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26605370BACKGROUNDLiew G, Michaelides M, Bunce C. A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16-64 years), 1999-2000 with 2009-2010. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 12;4(2):e004015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004015.
PMID: 24525390BACKGROUNDFarley TF, Mandava N, Prall FR, Carsky C. Accuracy of primary care clinicians in screening for diabetic retinopathy using single-image retinal photography. Ann Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;6(5):428-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.857.
PMID: 18779547BACKGROUNDSussman EJ, Tsiaras WG, Soper KA. Diagnosis of diabetic eye disease. JAMA. 1982 Jun 18;247(23):3231-4.
PMID: 7087063BACKGROUNDHarding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, White MC, Vora J. Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1131-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1131.
PMID: 7580708BACKGROUNDLin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;134(2):204-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01522-2.
PMID: 12140027BACKGROUNDSayres R, Taly A, Rahimy E, Blumer K, Coz D, Hammel N, Krause J, Narayanaswamy A, Rastegar Z, Wu D, Xu S, Barb S, Joseph A, Shumski M, Smith J, Sood AB, Corrado GS, Peng L, Webster DR. Using a Deep Learning Algorithm and Integrated Gradients Explanation to Assist Grading for Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2019 Apr;126(4):552-564. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
PMID: 30553900BACKGROUNDAbramoff MD, Folk JC, Han DP, Walker JD, Williams DF, Russell SR, Massin P, Cochener B, Gain P, Tang L, Lamard M, Moga DC, Quellec G, Niemeijer M. Automated analysis of retinal images for detection of referable diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;131(3):351-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1743.
PMID: 23494039BACKGROUNDKapetanakis VV, Rudnicka AR, Liew G, Owen CG, Lee A, Louw V, Bolter L, Anderson J, Egan C, Salas-Vega S, Rudisill C, Taylor P, Tufail A. A study of whether automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment could replace manual grading steps in the English National Screening Programme. J Med Screen. 2015 Sep;22(3):112-8. doi: 10.1177/0969141315571953. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PMID: 25742804BACKGROUNDXie Y, Nguyen QD, Hamzah H, Lim G, Bellemo V, Gunasekeran DV, Yip MYT, Qi Lee X, Hsu W, Li Lee M, Tan CS, Tym Wong H, Lamoureux EL, Tan GSW, Wong TY, Finkelstein EA, Ting DSW. Artificial intelligence for teleophthalmology-based diabetic retinopathy screening in a national programme: an economic analysis modelling study. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 May;2(5):e240-e249. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30060-1. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
PMID: 33328056BACKGROUNDWolff J, Pauling J, Keck A, Baumbach J. The Economic Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 20;22(2):e16866. doi: 10.2196/16866.
PMID: 32130134BACKGROUNDTufail A, Rudisill C, Egan C, Kapetanakis VV, Salas-Vega S, Owen CG, Lee A, Louw V, Anderson J, Liew G, Bolter L, Srinivas S, Nittala M, Sadda S, Taylor P, Rudnicka AR. Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Image Assessment Software: Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness Compared with Human Graders. Ophthalmology. 2017 Mar;124(3):343-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
PMID: 28024825BACKGROUNDTufail A, Kapetanakis VV, Salas-Vega S, Egan C, Rudisill C, Owen CG, Lee A, Louw V, Anderson J, Liew G, Bolter L, Bailey C, Sadda S, Taylor P, Rudnicka AR. An observational study to assess if automated diabetic retinopathy image assessment software can replace one or more steps of manual imaging grading and to determine their cost-effectiveness. Health Technol Assess. 2016 Dec;20(92):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta20920.
PMID: 27981917BACKGROUNDHeydon P, Egan C, Bolter L, Chambers R, Anderson J, Aldington S, Stratton IM, Scanlon PH, Webster L, Mann S, du Chemin A, Owen CG, Tufail A, Rudnicka AR. Prospective evaluation of an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm for automated diabetic retinopathy screening of 30 000 patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 May;105(5):723-728. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316594. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
PMID: 32606081BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Julie Jacob, MD PhD
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ophthalmologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2021
First Posted
May 26, 2022
Study Start
June 17, 2021
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
May 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share